So chief 'of the' angels is not the same as chief princes? What are the chief princes chief of? No, archangel is translated chief angel, not chief OF THE angels. And there are other chief angels.
As well...There is no specific passage that names Jesus as Michael before His incarnation. That is nothing less than an assumption and connection of convenience, bent on lowering His status. And what do you mean it was 'always' Michael who stood up for the sons of Daniel? Like you were there?
As far as 'obeisance', no matter. ALL the angels were told to do it...not all the "other" angels. As well, the beginning of the creation "of" God is not the same as "by" God. Your religion deliberately changed the words used. They insert them as well, because "other" is an inserted word into the text. All things were created through Him and by Him and for Him...not all "other " things. Jesus said.."I am the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, who is and was, and is to come...The Almighty" (Rev.1:8) And in case you don't think that was Jesus, it is repeated in vs.11, adding..."the first and the last". And in case you still don't think that was Jesus, it is repeated in vs. 17, where it is specifically Jesus who says.." I am the first and the last" He calls Himself the first and the last, which also means alpha and omega.
Further to that, here is Isaiah 9:6,7
6For unto us a Child is born,
Unto us a Son is given;
And the government will be upon His shoulder.
And His name will be called
Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
7Of the increase of His government and peace
There will be no end,