ChristisGod
Well-Known Member
hmmmm....well, that is not true. When you say things like that it is hard to take you serious when you don't accept facts. I assume you have looked at the historical evidence for the PERSON Jesus vs Aristotle or Plate etc. but maybe you haven't since you flat out say that there is more evidence for one than the other. That is simply and factually not true.
Some uninformed people have tried to claim that Jesus never even really existed. Others recognize he was indeed a real
person in history but reject anything mentioned that is in nature miraculous. Modern historians rule out the resurrection because of their philosophical presuppositions not because of lack of evidence. In other words because they believe that there is no such thing as a miracle they rule out the resurrection on that basis alone. I believe it is wise to let the facts speak for themselves even if it means we are proven wrong and forced to change our views. As for those who in their presuppositions claim "miracles do not happen" the question may be asked, "Where is the critic of scripture who can without error explain everything that happens in the world today by a purely rational and naturalistic means?" We will now examine some historical writings. We will show that certain events in the life and death of Jesus can be established as history without the use of the Bible.
The following is found in the Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia under Jesus Christ "Jesus ...as he was known to his
contemporaries, was a Jew who appeared as a prophet, a teacher, and a sage in Palestine about AD 30." THE HISTORICAL
JESUS The Christ-myth school of the early 20th century held that Jesus never lived but was invented as a peg on which to hang
the myth of a dying and rising God. Yet the evidence for the historical existence of Jesus is good." Non-Christian Sources
Among Roman historians, TACITUS (Annals 15.44) records that the Christian movement began with Jesus, who was
sentenced to death by Pontius Pilate."
The Book "The Historical Jesus" by Gary Habermas pg.187-188 we find some information and a quote from Tacitus Annals
15.44 as mentioned above that I would like to include. Cornelius Tactius was a Roman historian. He has been referred to as
the "greatest historian" of ancient Rome. He lived 55-120 AD
" Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus ( a variant spelling of Christ from Latin) from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of evil, but even in Rome"
From the previous sources we can learn that (1) Jesus lived about 30 A.D (2) Jesus was sentenced to death by the Roman
procurator Pontius Pilate.(3) during the reign of Tiberius (4) His death ended the "superstition" for a short time
(5) but it broke out again in Judaea where it originated (6) then it spread to Rome.
(Note the reign of Tiberious was 14-37 A.D.) It should also be noted that Jesus was crucified at Jerusalem Mt.20:17-19,
Lk.23:6-7. Jerusalem is in Judea this is where Tactius the Roman historian says "a most mischievous superstition, thus
checked for the moment again broke out" This correlates perfectly with Jesus' crucifixion, resurrection and the proclamation by
his disciples.
Flavius Josephus was a Jewish historian that lived from 37-97 A.D. he did not believe Jesus to be the Messiah. (This
can be found in "The Historical Jesus" by Gary Habermas pg.192.) Tertullian a theologian around 193 A.D. Had the following to
say about Josephus, Tertullian, The Apology chapter 19 "their critic the Jew Josephus, the native vindicator of the ancient
history of his people, who either authenticates or refutes the others."
The following quote is found in "The Works of Josephus", book 18, chapter 3, #3
"Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works--a
teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles.
He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross,
those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets
had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.
Here we seen a non-Christian source of ancient literature that verifies Pilate had Jesus condemned to the cross
and people believed they seen Jesus appear to them alive after the crucifixion. As Michael Green points out in
McDowell's book "Evidence", pg.187 "Josephus was a Jew writing to please the Romans. This story would not have pleased
them in the slightest. He hardly would have included it if it were not true."
Justin Martyr was a Christian writer who lived during 100-165 A.D. The following two quotes are his statements. "And
that it was predicted that our Christ should heal all diseases and raise the dead, hear what was said. There are these words:
"At His coming the lame shall leap as an hart, and the tongue of the stammerer shall be clear speaking: the blind shall see, and
the lepers shall be cleansed; and the dead shall rise, and walk about." And that He did those things, you can learn from the
Acts of Pontius Pilate."
"Jesus Christ stretched forth His hands, being crucified by the Jews speaking against Him, and denying that He was the
Christ. And as the prophet spoke, they tormented Him, and set Him on the judgment-seat, and said, Judge us. And the
expression, "They pierced my hands and my feet," was used in reference to the nails of the cross which were fixed in His hands
and feet. And after He was crucified they cast lots upon His vesture, and they that crucified Him parted it among them. And that these things did happen, you can ascertain from the Acts of Pontius Pilate."
Tthese quotes can be found in Ante-Nicene Fathers: Roberts, Alexander and Donaldson, James, Volume I, The First Apology
of Justin Chapter XLVIII & XXXV)
Justin here was appealing to "the Acts of Pontius Pilate" to his readers. Justin apparently believed the critics could verify these
things as actual events in this document. We can also see that Justin assumed his readers would know of the document he
was referring to. It should be noted here that there is no known manuscript found, which contains the Acts of Pontius Pilate.
Also this should not be confused with later fabrications by the same name. It is not known who wrote this document that Justin
refers to. Gary Habermas in his book "The Historical Jesus", pg.215-217 states that both Justin Martyr and Tertullian agree
that this was an official document of Rome.
The following information is to let you know who is who in the next 2 quotes concerning the darkness and earthquake at the
time of Jesus' death as recorded in Mt.27:45-54. Julius Africanus, took up chronological science in the imperfect state where
it was left by Clement, with whom he was partially contemporary; for he was Bishop of Emmaus in Palestine he composed
books of chronological history, under Marcus Aurelius who was a Roman Emperor from 161 A.D. until his death. Little seems
to be known of who Phlegon was; his work lost; extracts from it by Julius Africanus as well as others.
We know that he is called "Phlegon, bishop of Marathon" and he is also referred to as "Phlegon the Trallian" The Apostle Paul
sent his greetings to him, Romans 16:14, Tiberius Caesar was emperor of Rome, 14- 37 A.D. see Luke 3:1. Origen was a
theologian and lived during 185-254 A.D.
Julius Africanus, The Extant Writings,Vol.18 (James, Ante-Nicene Fathers: Volume VI, Roberts, Alexander and Donaldson,)
"Phlegon records that, in the time of Tiberius Caesar, at full moon, there was a full eclipse of the sun from the sixth hour to the ninth--manifestly that one of which we speak."
Origen against Celsus Vol. LIX, (Ante-Nicene Fathers: Volume IV, Roberts, Alexander and Donaldson, James.)
"He imagines also that both the earthquake and the darkness were an invention; but regarding these, we have in the preceding
pages, made our defence, according to our ability, adducing the testimony of Phlegon, who relates that these events took
place at the time when our Saviour suffered. And he goes on to say, that "Jesus, while alive, was of no assistance to himself,
but that he arose after death, and exhibited the marks of his punishment, and showed how his hands had been pierced by
nails."
Here we seen even the darkness and earthquake have been recorded. Although some have argued that this is impossible
because they say that the darkness would have to be an eclipse and at that time period they say there was no eclipse. Phlegon
lived during that time period he should know, if there was darkness and an earthquake or not better than people who lived after
the event. There is no known just grounds to discredit Phlegon's testimony of this event.