Mark, you do this all the time!No, but I did read it. Can you answer my question?
Your question was answered in the OP. What specific question about the OP do you have? What did I write that is confusing to you?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Mark, you do this all the time!No, but I did read it. Can you answer my question?
I'm saying there is not a valid answer in your OP.Mark, you do this all the time!
Your question was answered in the OP. What specific question about the OP do you have? What did I write that is confusing to you?
What specific question about the OP do you have?
I'm saying there is not a valid answer in your OP.
If you disagree, point to it. Highlight it.
How specific can I get?Non-specific rejections are not value added. Twice I’ve asked you to be specific with what you don’t understand.
This exchange supports the lack of rejection criteria.
Let’s start with your rejection criteria. The following sets of words would be deemed by me, Marks, as going against the trinity:How specific can I get?
No worries!
Much love!
Let’s start with your rejection criteria. The following sets of words would be deemed by me, Marks, as going against the trinity:
-
-
-
The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with all of you. 2 Corinthians 13:14 (NRSV)
Sophistry?exchange supports the lack of rejection criteria
The sophistry is you claiming the OP fails to meet the standard but then withhold precisely what is your rejection criteria.Sophistry?
The sophistry is you claiming the OP fails to meet the standard but then withhold precisely what is your rejection criteria.
In fact, such verses would never be written IF the authors embraced trinitiarianism.
Here is another 1 COR 15:57 But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
IF it is significant that there is a verse that mentions all 3 members of the trinity, it must also be important when verses do NOT mention all 3 members.
Also, this is another powerful juxtaposition verse showing agency. God - in his unitarian nature - achieves something through his agent, our Lord Jesus Christ. Evidently, this goal of God's does not require the assistant of that 3rd person - or the Father, for that matter.
I’ve asked this question many times to trinitarians. A couple of years ago, I started a thread about Disobedient Apostles. It’s the only plausible explanation, right?Many of the Epistles start by saying something like...
Grace be unto you, and peace from God our Father and from the Lord Jesus Christ.
How come the Holy Spirit person is always getting cheated out of the greeting?
He doesn't testify about Himself.I’ve asked this question many times to trinitarians. A couple of years ago, I started a thread about Disobedient Apostles. It’s the only plausible explanation, right?
He does that frequentlyYou are quoting this verse as 2 Corinthians 13:13
The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with all of you. 2 Corinthians 13:13 (NRSV)
This is...
2 Corinthians 13:13
All the saints salute you.
Scripture is neither pro-Trinity nor specifically anti-Trinity.
Scripture is pro-one God of Israel and anti-idolatry.