Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It is a law. That is why it is the law of gravity.BIG #1 = Gravity is NOT a "law".
It is the law of gravity and it is proven.#2 - the theory of gravity cannot be proven = for it does not exist
BIG #3 - WATER is the LAW of Physics created by GOD
TRUTH = WATER proves that gravity does not exist.
that looks an awful lot like the pill that much of christendom has swallowed
BIG #1 = Gravity is NOT a "law".Nonsense like the flat earth lives from attention. If you just ignore it instead of trying to convince the trolls/ppl resisting education of the reality we live in, it will die out. Because it does not work in real world.
74 pages of lost time and energy.
The wasted time and energy is in your mind when you do not believe GOD at His Word74 pages of lost time and energy
Thank you for your answer.Elementary Watson:
If the Earth were flat, the jet stream as we know it could not exist due to the fundamental differences in atmospheric dynamics and planetary rotation. The jet stream is a direct result of the Earth's spherical shape and its rotation, which create global wind patterns through the Coriolis effect and differential heating between the equator and poles.
With a theoretic impossible 'flat' Earth, the rotational speed would vary very drastically across the disk, with the equator moving faster than higher latitudes, disrupting the formation of stable, high-altitude wind currents.
Apparently you learned from this thread (thanks to myself and NASA - see posts #74 and onward) that the crescent of the moon is not from Earth's shadow.Nonsense like the flat earth lives from attention. If you just ignore it instead of trying to convince the trolls/ppl resisting education of the reality we live in, it will die out. Because it does not work in real world.
74 pages of lost time and energy.
Ah, so therefore it is a fact that you don't understand what you're talking about because you are too busy worrying about your next batch of pizza rolls in the microwave.Gravity pulls on objects. Why would gravity cause a man in a kayak to sink? If a man in a kayak is on an inch of water he will sink.
That is not how theories and facts work. Gravity is a law, so it is a fact. A theory is also a fact.
Could you inform me how I do not know what I am writing about?Ah, so therefore it is a fact that you don't understand what you're talking about because you are too busy worrying about your next batch of pizza rolls in the microwave.
Yes. It is because you are too busy worrying about the next batch of pizza rolls spinning in your microwave.Could you inform me how I do not know what I am writing about?
What are your thoughts on the idea the earth isn't a globe, but instead more of a flat plane?
Yes. It is because you are too busy worrying about the next batch of pizza rolls spinning in your microwave.
In response to your question about the absence of Earth's rotation... it is packed with technical details, and sufficient to convince you we are not living on a non-rotating flat earth.Thank you for your answer.
You are using planetary rotation in order to disprove flat earth. This does nothing to me, and I'm not impressed, because planetary rotation is also in question.
God can cause winds without spinning the earth. Remember, all things are possible with God.
So how about flat earth without planetary rotation?
You do not understand theories, laws, or facts. Your insults are lame.Yes. It is because you are too busy worrying about the next batch of pizza rolls spinning in your microwave.
Get with the theories - I mean, get with the facts.
In response to your question about the absence of Earth's rotation... it is packed with technical details, and sufficient to convince you we are not living on a non-rotating flat earth.
I considered it carefully, drawing heavily on my background in astronautics and aerospace engineering, as well as other fields, and consulted additional sources such as Space.com and the Columbia Climate School when needed.
A 'theory' is never a fact and never a law = it always remains as one's opinion until the scientific observable/measurable Evidence has been tested whereby it becomes a 'Law' because it already existed a such.Could you inform me how I do not know what I am writing about?
What you proved is that you have been instructed/trained/taught these answers from the globalists/satanists that control the world view.In response to your question about the absence of Earth's rotation... it is packed with technical details, and sufficient to convince you we are not living on a non-rotating flat earth.
I considered it carefully, drawing heavily on my background in astronautics and aerospace engineering, as well as other fields, and consulted additional sources such as Space.com and the Columbia Climate School when needed.
If Earth were flat and not rotating, the consequences would be catastrophic and fundamentally incompatible with known physics. First, gravity as we understand it would not function consistently on a flat plane. Gravity would pull toward the center of the disk, meaning it would become increasingly horizontal as one moves away from the center, causing water to flow toward the center and structures like trees to grow at angles. This would make stable ecosystems and life as we know it impossible.
Without planetary rotation, the centrifugal force that currently reduces apparent gravity at the equator would vanish, resulting in a slight increase in apparent weight at the equator compared to the poles, though actual gravitational force would remain unchanged. However, the more significant consequence would be the loss of Earth's equatorial bulge. If rotation ceased, the planet would gradually reshape itself into a more spherical form due to gravity pulling matter uniformly inward, causing oceans to shift toward the poles and creating massive landmasses at the equator.
The absence of rotation would also disrupt the Coriolis effect, which influences weather patterns and ocean currents, leading to drastically altered and likely unstable climate systems. Tides, which are primarily driven by the Moon’s gravitational pull, would cease to exist as we know them, since the Moon’s orbit and gravitational interaction depend on a spherical Earth.
Furthermore, the Earth’s magnetic field, generated by the motion of molten iron in the liquid outer core, would likely not form on a flat Earth. A flat core structure could not rotate properly to generate a magnetic field, leaving the planet vulnerable to solar wind. This would strip away the atmosphere and oceans over time, similar to what happened on Mars after its magnetic field weakened.
Satellite systems, including GPS, rely on orbital mechanics that are only possible around a spherical body. On a flat Earth, satellites could not maintain stable orbits, rendering modern navigation and communication systems inoperable. The Sun and Moon would need to be explained through entirely different mechanisms, such as rotating above the disk like a lamp, but this model fails to account for seasons, eclipses, and the observed sizes and distances of celestial bodies.
In summary, a non-rotating flat Earth would collapse under its own gravity into a spherical shape within hours, and the entire framework of physics, geology, and astronomy would fail to explain observed phenomena. The idea is not just scientifically implausible but fundamentally incompatible with the laws of nature as we understand them.
Hope this helps, as some sign off this way
What you proved is that you have been instructed/trained/taught these answers from the globalists/satanists that control the world view.In response to your question about the absence of Earth's rotation... it is packed with technical details, and sufficient to convince you we are not living on a non-rotating flat earth.
I considered it carefully, drawing heavily on my background in astronautics and aerospace engineering, as well as other fields, and consulted additional sources such as Space.com and the Columbia Climate School when needed.
If Earth were flat and not rotating, the consequences would be catastrophic and fundamentally incompatible with known physics. First, gravity as we understand it would not function consistently on a flat plane. Gravity would pull toward the center of the disk, meaning it would become increasingly horizontal as one moves away from the center, causing water to flow toward the center and structures like trees to grow at angles. This would make stable ecosystems and life as we know it impossible.
Without planetary rotation, the centrifugal force that currently reduces apparent gravity at the equator would vanish, resulting in a slight increase in apparent weight at the equator compared to the poles, though actual gravitational force would remain unchanged. However, the more significant consequence would be the loss of Earth's equatorial bulge. If rotation ceased, the planet would gradually reshape itself into a more spherical form due to gravity pulling matter uniformly inward, causing oceans to shift toward the poles and creating massive landmasses at the equator.
The absence of rotation would also disrupt the Coriolis effect, which influences weather patterns and ocean currents, leading to drastically altered and likely unstable climate systems. Tides, which are primarily driven by the Moon’s gravitational pull, would cease to exist as we know them, since the Moon’s orbit and gravitational interaction depend on a spherical Earth.
Furthermore, the Earth’s magnetic field, generated by the motion of molten iron in the liquid outer core, would likely not form on a flat Earth. A flat core structure could not rotate properly to generate a magnetic field, leaving the planet vulnerable to solar wind. This would strip away the atmosphere and oceans over time, similar to what happened on Mars after its magnetic field weakened.
Satellite systems, including GPS, rely on orbital mechanics that are only possible around a spherical body. On a flat Earth, satellites could not maintain stable orbits, rendering modern navigation and communication systems inoperable. The Sun and Moon would need to be explained through entirely different mechanisms, such as rotating above the disk like a lamp, but this model fails to account for seasons, eclipses, and the observed sizes and distances of celestial bodies.
In summary, a non-rotating flat Earth would collapse under its own gravity into a spherical shape within hours, and the entire framework of physics, geology, and astronomy would fail to explain observed phenomena. The idea is not just scientifically implausible but fundamentally incompatible with the laws of nature as we understand them.
Hope this helps, as some sign off this way
LOVE whole leaf Sencha Green Tea and Match Green TeaWell yyyeahhhhh, herbal tea sometimes. And mine tastes great because of the great herbal ingredients and the purity of the water, and its hot.
Ingredients such as: green ginger, or straight ginger, rose hips, orange peel, hibiscus, passion fruit, mango, safflower, licorice root, passionfruit. lemongrass and more.
I also like coffee now. A great picker-upper in the a,m.
So my beverage water goes into the cup and immediately seeks its own level based on the quantity of water and the shape and size of the cup. The bigger and higher the cup the lower the water level. And if I get a crack in the bottom of the cup, the water level will go to zero, quite quickly.
And off course water does not run down the outsides of the earth's top layer of atmosphere, stratosphere right, in its not so perfect spherical shape. It has a slight bulge in the middle that goes all around. Must have gained a few pounds since the earth population has increased and more people want to retire to the warmer weather. Just a wild theory of course and I think its got nothing to do with space-born water flowing down the sides of the earth and the water levels we see at surface level. Maybe some global warming people would differ with me, and may even support your water flow and level view. You know if there are cracks on the ocean floors the water level in those areas might even be lower that other areas....just another thought.....you might know, I could be dead wrong.
So, are we now tracking or am I way off the subject still. Because I still don't know what all this has to do with the water level in China, or even in Australia for that matter? And in Australia there are not many long ranges and high hills so the water cannot run up on or down them for too long, and that should not make much difference in the water level in that county anyway. And they really need the water down under, they've got such a big dry area loaded with desert areas there.....I don't know all their names.....just call it all the outback I reckon.....
So you are saying that God is not for a spherical earth. So the earth must be flat then and based on the water flow and level idea. I've always wondered why I don't spin off into outer space if the earth is like a ball and spinning very, very fast, 24/7. So maybe your idea hold water after all?!
You'll let me know, I'm sure of it. For another discussion then...
A 'theory' is never a fact and never a law
A law and a theory are factual explanations.= it always remains as one's opinion until the scientific observable/measurable Evidence has been tested whereby it becomes a 'Law' because it already existed a such.
gravity remains as a theory/opinion because it cannot be proven
Furthermore, the opinion of gravity is De-Bunked by the Law of Physics in God's Creation of WATER
WATER always seeks it own Level 24/7 worldwide and this is proven 24/7 worldwide thru observable tested science.
WATER can never bend around a ball and stick to to it = PROVEN Scientific Observable Science 24/7
FYI = ICE is frozen Water that has become a SOLID due to Temperature below 32 degrees farhenheight
Please look up the definitions of these words:A theory is a fact. A law is a fact. A law is not a theory.
A law and a theory are factual explanations.
A theory is not promoted to being a law.
Gravity is a law. It is proven. Unless you live on a funny farm or are trying to troll people, gravity is obvious.
Ice is frozen water. It is really interesting as it floats as a solid.
I think you are playing a game and I must give you a thumbs up.