Flat Earth Theory

[TLHKAJ]

Maybe I did worship at the feet of satanists before I became a Christian , but now I am like you @David in NJ , I am forgiven .

 

[Bladerunner]

Prove it

Jesus Christ died for all those who would come to believe. buried and resurrected in three days....as proof a life after death.

 

[David in NJ]

I have a problem. I think only God saves, and that not even Jesus died for sins, but he died above sins and sinners.

God made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God.
2 Corinthians 5:21 = Judgment #1

 

[David in NJ]

Thanks for replying. Let me answer the question you asked in giant letters first. Yes, of course the evidence of God's word is sufficient for me. However, the evidence I was asking you for was evidence that the photo was faked, and that it was from Hollywood and Stanley Kubrick. As God's word makes no mention of photographs (fake or otherwise), Hollywood, or Kubrick, I fail to see how I could find evidence in the bible that the photo was indeed faked.

You also said that Creation itself equals water, and that is evidence. What biblical reason do you have for saying that Creation equals water? It certainly included water, but it doesn't equal water.

You mentioned 1 Thessalonians 5:1-4. Those verses say:

(1Th 5:1) But concerning the times and the seasons, brethren, you have no need that I should write to you.
(1Th 5:2) For you yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so comes as a thief in the night.
(1Th 5:3) For when they say, "Peace and safety!" then sudden destruction comes upon them, as labor pains upon a pregnant woman. And they shall not escape.
(1Th 5:4) But you, brethren, are not in darkness, so that this Day should overtake you as a thief.

Please tell me, what is the connection between those words about the day of the Lord, an d the matter of whether or not a photo is faked?

Good Morning my Brothers in Christ = including @talons

There is no Creation without Water.

WATER has/is/of Paramount Evidence for us to SEE and Understand God's Creation.

Man's science is easily manipulated for 'their' agenda, which is deception.
Perfect example is 'their' science of evolution.
So also is their water ball spinning thru space via Babylon, NASA, CGI that all defies God's Creation by which HE demonstrates thru WATER.

Looking forward to our meeting in New Eternal Glorified Bodies made in His Image = 1 John 3:1-3

also = 1 Cor 12:20-26

SHALOM

 

[MonoBiblical]

Jesus Christ died for all those who would come to believe. buried and resurrected in three days....as proof a life after death.

[Mat 1:21 KJV] 21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

Why not the whole planet not just Israel?

 

[MonoBiblical]

God made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God.
2 Corinthians 5:21 = Judgment #1

Yeah, became the sin of crucifixation. He was still above sins.

 

[Wick Stick]

[Mat 1:21 KJV] 21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

Why not the whole planet not just Israel?

Respectfully, "His people" isn't necessarily Israel. "My sheep know My voice."

 

[MonoBiblical]

Respectfully, "His people" isn't necessarily Israel. "My sheep know My voice."

But his sheep were Israelites; still there is nothing about him saving any except Israel and god fearing gentiles, as much as, he is above sin.

 

[Wick Stick]

But his sheep were Israelites; still there is nothing about him saving any except Israel and god fearing gentiles, as much as, he is above sin.

It seems that "god fearing gentiles" were made to become part of Israel.

If so, then salvation just for "my people" can include anyone

 

[MonoBiblical]

It seems that "god fearing gentiles" were made to become part of Israel.

If so, then salvation just for "my people" can include anyone

This is not necessarily true, because circumcision was a waste time before the soon second coming. Gentiles acting like Hebrews and Israelites is what I see, and to this day, there are nothing but God-fearing gentiles.

 

[Wick Stick]

This is not necessarily true, because circumcision was a waste time before the soon second coming. Gentiles acting like Hebrews and Israelites is what I see, and to this day, there are nothing but God-fearing gentiles.

You have completely missed the New Testament teaching on adoption, then? And the Old Testament one too, I guess.

That seems like a rather large hole in your theology

 

[MonoBiblical]

You have completely missed the New Testament teaching on adoption, then? And the Old Testament one too, I guess.

That seems like a rather large hole in your theology

Adoption what? Theology is all about adding concepts and words which are not there.

 

[Wick Stick]

Theology is all about adding concepts and words which are not there.

That's a very Catholic idea of theology. I think of it more in terms of understanding Scripture, which is a very Protestant idea of theology.

Maybe we should default to a Jewish idea of theology - taking different sides of an argument in an attempt to arrive at truth.

Adoption what?

Starting from Scripture?

Romans 9:3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: 4 Who are Israelites; to whom [pertaineth] the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service [of God], and the promises; 5 Whose [are] the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ [came], who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen. 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they [are] not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, [are they] all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these [are] not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.

 

[TLHKAJ]

Watching this, @David in NJ @doctrox @Psalm-147:3 @IndianaRob

 

[doctrox]

This is a photo of earth that was taken by the Mars Orbiter from 186 million miles. It appeared very briefly on weather.com and I was able to get it before it was taken down. We can see that the earth is pear shaped as it is described by the head of the Hayden Planetarium. We can also see that it is very flat on one side. It is obviously not a perfect round ball, those images are obviously photo shopped to fit the expected expectations of what the earth is supposed to look like. I also heard from a very well known You tuber, Richie from Boston, who is a flat earth believer, that he was recognized and approached by a special forces soldier. These people are parachuted from great heights and he confirmed to Richie that the earth is flat. He'd seen what it looked like when he was on one of his missions.

1. Right-click on the image and select "Search with Google Lens;" it claims it is Venus and not Earth. Also, the opinions of Ritchie and "unknown special forces soldiers" and other content creators are not sacrosanct.

2. But the fraud is in the deceptive language. A picture, illustration, drawing, image, rendering, or painting is NOT a real-life scene.

Conversely, a photograph is specifically taken with a camera, capturing a real-life scene.

A photograph is actually a real image which is obtained on a screen (photographic film). A real image is formed when rays of light converge at a point after reflection or refraction.

So here's the scam: You won't find a single photograph of a globe Earth.

(Note: A picture is a broader term that includes photographs, drawings, paintings, and any other visual representations. Essentially, all photographs are pictures, but not all pictures are photographs.)

To further illustrate (pun intended), you will never find a single photograph (a real-life scene captured via camera) of any NASA satellite. (Go ahead, check the labelings on NASA's voluminous pages of images.) Those images will always be labeled with some other term (e.g. picture, illustration, drawing, image, rendering, painting, mosaic, ad nauseum). Again, you will never find a single photograph of globe earth.

Anything that is NOT a real-life scene will always be labeled with something other than "photograph."

Cartoons are for kids.

Caveat emptor.

Watching this, @doctrox

Dave has heart; I'll watch the vid tonight.

 

[Biblica]

1. Right-click on the image and select "Search with Google Lens;" it claims it is Venus and not Earth. Also, the opinions of Ritchie and "unknown special forces soldiers" and other content creators are not sacrosanct.

2. But the fraud is in the deceptive language. A picture, illustration, drawing, image, rendering, or painting is NOT a real-life scene.

Conversely, a photograph is specifically taken with a camera, capturing a real-life scene.

A photograph is actually a real image which is obtained on a screen (photographic film). A real image is formed when rays of light converge at a point after reflection or refraction.

So here's the scam: You won't find a single photograph of a globe Earth.

(Note: A picture is a broader term that includes photographs, drawings, paintings, and any other visual representations. Essentially, all photographs are pictures, but not all pictures are photographs.)

To further illustrate (pun intended), you will never find a single photograph (a real-life scene captured via camera) of any NASA satellite. (Go ahead, check the labelings on NASA's voluminous pages of images.) Those images will always be labeled with some other term (e.g. picture, illustration, drawing, image, rendering, painting, mosaic, ad nauseum). Again, you will never find a single photograph of globe earth.

Anything that is NOT a real-life scene will always be labeled with something other than "photograph."

Cartoons are for kids.

Caveat emptor.


Dave has heart; I'll watch the vid tonight.

"select "Search with Google Lens;" it claims it is Venus and not Earth." Do you really think they are going to reveal the truth and admit that the earth is not perfectly round? I heard the head of the Haydin Planetarium say on a television interview that the earth was an "oblate spheroid pear shaped" which matches the picture from the Mars orbiter.

 

[David in NJ]

Watching this, @David in NJ @doctrox @Psalm-147:3 @IndianaRob

God's Science is Truth = WATER

So simple a child can SEE and understand

 

[David in NJ]

1. Right-click on the image and select "Search with Google Lens;" it claims it is Venus and not Earth. Also, the opinions of Ritchie and "unknown special forces soldiers" and other content creators are not sacrosanct.

2. But the fraud is in the deceptive language. A picture, illustration, drawing, image, rendering, or painting is NOT a real-life scene.

Conversely, a photograph is specifically taken with a camera, capturing a real-life scene.

A photograph is actually a real image which is obtained on a screen (photographic film). A real image is formed when rays of light converge at a point after reflection or refraction.

So here's the scam: You won't find a single photograph of a globe Earth.

(Note: A picture is a broader term that includes photographs, drawings, paintings, and any other visual representations. Essentially, all photographs are pictures, but not all pictures are photographs.)

To further illustrate (pun intended), you will never find a single photograph (a real-life scene captured via camera) of any NASA satellite. (Go ahead, check the labelings on NASA's voluminous pages of images.) Those images will always be labeled with some other term (e.g. picture, illustration, drawing, image, rendering, painting, mosaic, ad nauseum). Again, you will never find a single photograph of globe earth.

Anything that is NOT a real-life scene will always be labeled with something other than "photograph."

Cartoons are for kids.

Caveat emptor.


Dave has heart; I'll watch the vid tonight.

God's Science is Truth = WATER

So simple a child can SEE and understand

 

[David in NJ]

"select "Search with Google Lens;" it claims it is Venus and not Earth." Do you really think they are going to reveal the truth and admit that the earth is not perfectly round? I heard the head of the Haydin Planetarium say on a television interview that the earth was an "oblate spheroid pear shaped" which matches the picture from the Mars orbiter.

So why have they been LYING all along...!!!

Oh i KNOW why:
a.) Deception = Power
b.) Power = Control
c.) Control = MONEY

 

[doctrox]

Do you really think they are going to reveal the truth and admit that the earth is not perfectly round?

Either way, they don't have any photographs taken from "outer space" (because the firmament and their satanic overlords prevent them). The "not perfectly round" claim is a straw man argument.

I heard the head of the Haydin Planetarium say on a television interview that the earth was an "oblate spheroid pear shaped" which matches the picture from the Mars orbiter.

That would be the stand-in, Neil deGrasse Tyson, tv-"programming" the masses. One fraud aids and abets another.

Tyson maintains that no verifiable data supports the existence of a higher power. In March 2014, philosopher and secularism proponent Massimo Pigliucci asked Tyson: "What is it you think about God?" Tyson replied: "I remain unconvinced by any claims anyone has ever made about the existence or the power of a divine force operating in the universe."