How old is the Earth?

[Eternally Grateful]

Thank you for answering.

The Bible was never intended as a science textbook. It is a book about God (although Pastor Begg says it is really a book about Jesus). God reveals His character, expectations, promises, warnings, . . . . Are there any references to technology changes from Abraham to Jesus, other than a passing reference to the introduction of iron implements?

If no person witnessed an event, we cannot deduce what happened? If true, how could we solve any crimes without witnesses? Solve the reason an airplane crashed? How has science verified the occurrence of events described in the Bible (e.g., King David’s occupation of Jerusalem)?

Does it matter? Atheists have slowly taken over the public square by taking no hostages in the culture wars. It doesn’t need to be that way. Science can be taught as God-centered, instead of as random and purposeless.

Peace.

sorry brother. I can not agree

 

[Eternally Grateful]

Please provide a link to the “new science” about the layers in the Grand Canyon.

look it up. there are many things showing this.

creation science is a place to look.

Look up Dr Andrew Snelling

Watch the documentary serious is genesis history. the second part really gets into the grand canyon/

Creationscience.com

Dr Walk Brown

in fact. those who believe the canyon was created by the river is dwindling. even among secular science.

look up what happened at Mt St Helens, and what they are calling the "Mini Grand Canyon" and how it was formed in a matter of days. not billions of years.

I can go on and on

Again, this is all speculation and theory.. but so is all the evidence yuo would show.

people take the same evidence and have different reasons.

science has been doing this for many years now

 

[Eternally Grateful]

Thank you for responding.

When sediment is layered after a flood, the heaviest items settle first, etc., with the lightest on top. That is not what is observed.

Peace.

yes this is shown in the grand canyon.

 

[Bob]

yes this is shown in the grand canyon.

I watched a typical video on the “young” Grand Canyon. There were two spurious assumptions: (1) Noah’s flood occurred so the layer at the bottom must be from the flood. (2) The layer at the bottom is sandstone that easily fractures, so it must be “young.”
Not terribly good science.

Go in peace. The discussion has no more to add.

 

[Eternally Grateful]

I watched a typical video on the “young” Grand Canyon. There were two spurious assumptions: (1) Noah’s flood occurred so the layer at the bottom must be from the flood. (2) The layer at the bottom is sandstone that easily fractures, so it must be “young.”
Not terribly good science.

Go in peace. The discussion has no more to add.

lol.. if this is all you read. you have not read much.

again, we can believe what we want.. Peace back to you