Actually, I read it very carefully, and I find that it does.It actually doesn't if you read it carefully.
Much love!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Actually, I read it very carefully, and I find that it does.It actually doesn't if you read it carefully.
If your young early or old earth it doesn't determine ones salvation. I have heard it both ways and both make good points. Just had to do that in.Actually, I read it very carefully, and I find that it does.
Much love!
I agree! Doctrine doesn't save us, trust in Jesus does that.If your young early or old earth it doesn't determine ones salvation. I have heard it both ways and both make good points. Just had to do that in.
The Bible presents a young earth, and it's important to be able to read the Bible the way it's written, and not with reservations. Looking at this strictly from "creation days", there is much debate over how long those days were. People resort to "the Day/Age Theory", "the Gap Theory", "Theistic Evolution", "Pre-Adamic Civilizations", but the Bible says plainly that in 6 days God created heaven and earth and all that is in them, and on the 7th day He rested. So you also work 6 days and rest on the 7th. It's the same days, and we rest just like God rested, we know exactly how long that day is.
So when we come to that passage, and others like it, can we read it and accept it fully, or do we have ways of negating what it says in favor of some other theory?
Much love!
Personally I'll stick with the translation.This is how I have paraphrased Genesis 1:1-2:3:-
Personally I'll stick with the translation.

How long was the earth without form and void?I agree! Doctrine doesn't save us, trust in Jesus does that.
Much love!
Actually, if it read in Hebrew, Gen 1 says exactly what is meant.....the problem is with the word that is presented as “day”.....which in Hebrew is “yôm”......Now what is interesting is how many ways this word is rendered by English translators.....If your young early or old earth it doesn't determine ones salvation. I have heard it both ways and both make good points. Just had to do that in.
How long was the earth without form and void?
It only seems irrelevant to those unwilling to engage with it. Young-Earth proponents often treat Genesis as if it were a high school science textbook, but in reality, it was never written for Christians to determine the earth’s age. It's true purpose is to convey divine principles, revealing that God Himself in His Temple and brings order to chaos.I believe that this question is irrelevant. What is relevant is that we can see God's glory on display in the creation story. The important matter that needs to be understood is how our response to the creation story frames our relationship and understanding of God.
Personally I'll stick with the translation.
I find this definitive:
Exodus 20:8-11 KJV
8) Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9) Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10) But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11) For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
Six days we work, the seventh day we rest, just like God did.
Much love!
How long was the earth without form and void?
The physical darkness is merely the absence of light. God is the creator of both.And another question, why?
1 John 1:5 This is the message we have heard from him and proclaim to you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
Why the darkness on the earth without form and void.
Does it represent something spiritual?
Actually, if it read in Hebrew, Gen 1 says exactly what is meant.....the problem is with the word is presented as “day”.....which in Hebrew is “yôm”......Now what is interesting is how many ways this word is rendered by English translators.....
According to Strongs Concordance...The KJV translates Strong's H3117 in the following manner: day (2,008x), time (64x), chronicles (with H1697) (37x), daily (44x), ever (18x), year (14x), continually (10x), when (10x), as (10x), while (8x), full (8x), always (4x), whole (4x), alway (4x), miscellaneous (44x).
So we get an idea of how many meanings can be applied to this one word, that doesn’t just mean just a 24 hour period. Reasons for pause and reflection.
The other thing that stands out to many Bible readers is the fact that Gen 1:1 and verse 2 read as if they took place one after the other, in quick succession... but read as separate events in the stream of time, rather than in a short earthly period (as if 24 hours was all that was necessary for vastness of God’s creation) these fail to take into account why these periods of time were undertaken in planned increments with a declaration of satisfaction after each was successfully concluded.
If God can create a whole Universe in a “day”, then why not create the earth as a finished product? Why would God need increments of his preparation of the earth for habitation, over set periods of time....why was there 6 periods of time to bring his creation to a completion?.....and what is time to a timeless being? Is he bound by our limited view of time which is governed by the rotation of this planet. How long is a “day” on Jupiter? or Mercury?
If we step back and see Genesis as it was presented to uneducated people in a fairly simplistic way, does it mean that we have reduced perhaps many millenniums of God’s creative works, as if he were some kind of magician rather than a careful, loving and thoughtful Creator?
How old the earth is, is of no relevance except to the YEC supporters who insist on the 24 hour day scenario, which is contradicted by science and archeology. They can guess how old the earth is, maybe not truly accurately, but they can at least explain the extinction of dinosaurs and why none were in existence long before man came on the scene. They can explain why so many species of living things came and went before man’s creation.
Why were there no dinosaurs mentioned in Scripture or accommodated on the ark? The obvious answer is that by the time of human creation, they had served their purpose and were no longer needed.
Living aquatic creatures and birds were seen on the 5th day and land animals were brought into existence on the 6th day.....mankind was not created until the end of that last creative day. If the days were very long periods of time, then God is a masterful Creator not a whimsical magician. One only has to examine creation itself to see how much careful detail there is even in the microscopic world.
I would not recommend to mix science and biblical texts. They are two totally different genres and styles.There are some built in assumptions that determine the outcomes of the readings, and if those assumptions are false, then the readings don't show what people think they show.
One assumption concerns the level of radiation received by the target material, be it a tree, or animal, or whatever, that we "know" what that radiation level was. In fact we do not, as no one was there taking test samples for us. And we have good reason to think it may have been very different.
The Bible addresses this head on:
2 Peter 3:3-7 KJV
3) Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4) And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
5) For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
6) Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
7) But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
God judged the world once with water, and will again by fire. But people don't want to think about that! So they look at a world ravaged by that flood, that killed all but 8 people, and tell themselves, there wasn't anything cataclysmic, this all happened just like it happens today, over a long long time. In a word, Uniformatarianism.
". . . All things continue as they were from the beginning . . ."
Just like in Romans 1, people did not want to be thankful, and so admit accountability to God, so they chose to forget about Him. Here, they don't want to know God will judge them, again, accountability, so they lie to themselves that it's all been going on for millions and millions of years, no, this wasn't from God's judgment! Because that would be admitting God will judge me!
Uniformatarianism as a philosophy exists to aid man in ridding God from his thoughts. In fact things have not continued always just as they were. There seem to be no end of "exceptions", such as fossil layers that don't match the theoretical "fossil record", trees standing upright through "millions of years" of rock layers, dinosaur fossils with soft tissue, rocks tested to be millions of years old that were actually formed in the modern day, it goes on and on.
1 Timothy 6:20-21 KJV
20) O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
21) Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
Much love!
The physical darkness is merely the absence of light. God is the creator of both.
Why did God create a people (light) out of Egypt (darkness)?I am still intrigued by :
Gen 1:2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.
It does not read as if it was only for a few seconds. And... the universe is a violent place, we are lucky Earth is located in a relative safe place in the milky way, safe from super novas but not from comets and asteroids slamming into Earth. Current science teaches that 4.5 billion years ago the moon slammed into Earth (not sure how they can proof that) but it reminded me as a (emphasis added) reason why the Earth was without form and gravity had to redo its work.
Point being from a spiritual point of view, why did God use so much violence to create and why do we live in such a hostile place as the universe is. There must be a spiritual reason.
Truth is truth. And if science disagrees with Scripture, relook at the "science".I would not recommend to mix science and biblical texts. They are two totally different genres and styles.
I don't think the Bible is consistent in this regard.It actually doesn't [present a young earth] if you read it carefully.
The question for this line of thinking is - was Exodus written first, with Genesis 1 being written later to support it?I find this definitive:
Exodus 20:8-11 KJV
8) Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9) Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10) But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11) For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
Six days we work, the seventh day we rest, just like God did.