If Looks Could Kill

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Jul 17, 2007
119
0
0
61
Haman was a very cunning and determined man. The fact this took a generations to play out as relating to the cause, is even more interesting.
Deu 25:19 Therefore it shall be, when the LORD thy God hath given thee rest from all thine enemies round about, in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it, that thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget it.Est 3:1 After these things did king Ahasuerus promote Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, and advanced him, and set his seat above all the princes that were with him.Several different commentaries ------------------------------The Agagite - The Jews generally understand by this expression “the descendant of Agag,” the Amalekite monarch of 1 Sam. 15. Who was spared by Saul, but destroyed by Samuel; whom both the Targums make to descend from Amalek, and to be of the stock or family of Agag, the common name of the kings of Amalek; as Josephus states.Est 3:5-6 And when Haman saw that Mordecai bowed not, nor did him reverence, then was Haman full of wrath. And he thought scorn to lay hands on Mordecai alone; for they had shewed him the people of Mordecai: wherefore Haman sought to destroy all the Jews that were throughout the whole kingdom of Ahasuerus, even the people of Mordecai.(Continued Below)
 
Jul 17, 2007
119
0
0
61
The reason Esther and Mordecai faced Haman was due to the fact Satan was trying to destroy the birthline of Christ. You see the Jews of Persia at the time of Esther were the ancestors of Christ.
Yes, that's true also. It's also true that God promised them they would return. The fact that you call your self a Jew, doesn't impress me at all, since you have no idea what your taking about. I guess ignorance is bliss?!? The fact about Christ's lineage is well documented, and being a Jew, you should be aware of this, but obviously you don't.Easton's Bible Dictionary & Strong's Concordance------------------------------------------------Jehoiachin Succeeded his father Jehoiakin (599 B.C.) when only eight years of age, and reigned for one hundred days (2Ch_36:9). He is also called Jeconiah (Jer_24:1; Jer_27:20, etc.), and Coniah (Jer_22:24; Jer_37:1). He was succeeded by his uncle, Mattaniah = Zedekiah (q.v.). He was the last direct heir to the Jewish crown. He was carried captive to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar, along with the flower of the nobility, all the leading men in Jerusalem, and a great body of the general population, some thirteen thousand in all (2Ki_24:12-16; Jer_52:28). After an imprisonment of 37 years (Jer_52:31, Jer_52:33), he was liberated by Evil-merodach (Fool- (of) Death), and permitted to occupy a place in the king's household and sit at his table, receiving “every day a portion until the day of his death, all the days of his life” (Jer_52:32-34).Jehoiachin =" Jehovah establishes" AV-Jehoiachin 10; 10 from 03068 and 03559; ; n pr m 1) king of Judah, son of Jehoiakim, and the next to last king of Judah before the Babylonian captivity; kingship lasted for 3 months and 10 days before he surrendered to Nebuchadnezzar who took him to Babylon and imprisoned him for 37 years when he was finally released.Shealtiel =" I have asked of God" AV-Salathiel 3; 3 4528 salayihl Salathiel sal-ath-ee-ale' of Hebrew origin 07597 laytlv; ; n pr m 1) the son of Jeconiah in the genealogy of Christ.(Shealtiel) Pedaiah = Redemption of the Lord. 1. The father of Zebudah, who was the wife of Josiah and mother of king Jehoiakim #2Ki 23:36 2. The father of Zerubbabel #1Ch 3:17-19 3. The father of Joel, ruler of the half-tribe of Manasseh #1Ch 27:20 4. #Ne 3:25 5. A Levite #Ne 8:4 6. A Benjamite #Ne 11:7 7. A Levite #Ne 13:13 Zerubbabel =" born at Babel, i.e. Babylon"AV-Zorobabel 3; 3 2216 Zorobabel Zorobabel dzor-ob-ab'-el of Hebrew origin 02216 lbbrz; ; n pr m 1) the head of the tribe of Judah at the time of the return from Babylonish captivity in the first year of Cyrus.Zerubbabel, the seed of Babylon, the son of Salathiel or Shealtiel (Hag_1:1; Zorobabel, Mat_1:12); called also the son of Pedaiah (1Ch_3:17-19), i.e., according to a frequent usage of the word “son;” the grandson or the nephew of Salathiel. He is also known by the Persian name of Sheshbazzar (Ezr_1:8, Ezr_1:11). In the first year of Cyrus, king of Persia, he led the first band of Jews, numbering 42,360 (Ezr_2:64), exclusive of a large number of servants, who returned from captivity at the close of the seventy years. In the second year after the Return, he erected an altar and laid the foundation of the temple on the ruins of that which had been destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar (Ezr_3:8-13; Ezra 4 - 6). All through the work he occupied a prominent place, inasmuch as he was a descendant of the royal line of David.Sheshbazzar = O sun-god, defend the lord! (Ezr_1:8, Ezr_1:11), probably another name for Zerubbabel (q.v.), Ezr_2:2; Hag_1:12, Hag_1:14; Zec_4:6, Zec_4:10.
So if they had be exterminated how could Christ have been born???
They weren't destroyed, but well taken care of, as you can see!
 
Jul 17, 2007
119
0
0
61
This also points out the fact that many, many Jews did not even desire to return to Jerusalem when "The Nethinims" were willing to. And why did Ezra call for an actual Levi to be sent for, when none where found! Futhermore why did he send aNethinim to find them, when previously the Nethinim were just servants to the real priests of Levi. There were already 392 Nethinim accounted for in the first wave of settlers, 220 more joined them for a total of 612. Yet, there were only 38 Levites and they had to be asked to join. Ezr 8:15-20 And I gathered them together to the river that runneth to Ahava; and there abode we in tents three days: and I viewed the people, and the priests, and found there none of the sons of Levi ... And I sent them with commandment unto Iddo the chief at the place Casiphia, and I told them what they should say unto Iddo, and to his brethren the Nethinims ... that they should bring unto us ministers for the house of our God ... And by the good hand of our God upon us they brought us a man of understanding, of the sons of Mahli, the son of Levi, the son of Israel; and Sherebiah, with his sons and his brethren, eighteen ... And Hashabiah, and with him Jeshaiah of the sons of Merari, his brethren and their sons, twenty; Ezr 8:20 Also of the Nethinims, whom David and the princes had appointed for the service of the Levites, two hundred and twenty Nethinims: all of them were expressed by name. Fausset's Bible Dictionary--------------------------Iddo - Chief of those who met at Casiphia (between Babylon and Jerusalem) to join in the second caravan returning under Ezra in the reign of Artaxerxes Longimanus, 458 B.C. Iddo was one of the 220 Nethinims who joined in the return(Continued From Above)On top of that The Nethinims use to dwell with the Amalekites (Haman might have been, very possibly) before they moved to Hamath (Hemeth) or Syrian Ecbatana. Num 24:18-22. 1Sa 15:6-9 And Saul said unto the Kenites, Go, depart, get you down from among the Amalekites, lest I destroy you with them: for ye shewed kindness to all the children of Israel, when they came up out of Egypt. So the Kenites departed from among the Amalekites. And Saul smote the Amalekites from Havilah until thou comest to Shur, that is over against Egypt. And he took Agag the king of the Amalekites alive, and utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword. But Saul and the people spared Agag, and the best of the sheep, and of the oxen, and of the fatlings, and the lambs, and all that was good, and would not utterly destroy them: but every thing that was vile and refuse, that they destroyed utterly.1Ch 2:55 And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambyses_IIThe death of CambysesMeanwhile in Persia the king's brother Smerdis (Bardiya) rose against him and was acknowledged throughout Asia, although it was later claimed by Darius, after he had killed him and claimed the throne for himself, that this was not in fact the genuine Smerdis but an impostor, a Magian (Magi) named Gaumata, Smerdis having been murdered some three years previously. Cambyses attempted to march against him, but, seeing probably that success was impossible, died by his own hand (March 522). This is the account of Darius, Cambyses' lance-bearer at the time, which certainly must be preferred to the traditions of Herodotus and Ctesias, which ascribe his death to an accident, although it has also been speculated that Cambyses may in fact have been murdered by Darius as the first step to usurping the empire for himself. According to Herodotus (3.64) he died in the Syrian Ecbatana, i.e. Hamath; Josephus (Antiquites xi. 2. 2) names Damascus; Ctesias, Babylon, which is absolutely impossible. Cambyses was buried in Pasargadae. The remains of his tomb were identified in 2006.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MagianThe Magi (singular Magus, from Latin, via the Greeks; Old English: Mage; from the Old Persian magus) were a tribe from ancient Media, who prior to the conquest of the Medes by the Achaemenid Empire in 550 BC were responsible for religious and funerary practices. Later they accepted the Zoroastrian religion, not without changing the original message of its founder, Zarathustra (Zoroaster).
 
Jul 17, 2007
119
0
0
61
The History of who were the Foriegn Ruling Kings of Persia?Easton's Bible Dictionary-------------------------Cyrus (Heb. Koresh) the son of Cambyses, the prince of Persia, the celebrated “King of Persia” (Elam) who was conqueror of Babylon, and issued the decree of liberation to the Jews (Ezr_1:1, Ezr_1:2). Cyrus was born about 599 BC. In the year 559 B.C. he became king of Persia and Media. Cyrus was a great military leader, bent on universal conquest. Babylon fell before his army (538 B.C.) on the night of Belshazzar's feast (Dan_5:30), and then the ancient dominion of Assyria was also added to his empire (cf., “Go up, O Elam” - Isa_21:2). Hitherto the great kings of the earth had only oppressed the Jews. Cyrus was to them as a “shepherd” (Isa_44:28; Isa_45:1). The “first year of Cyrus” (Ezr_1:1) is not the year of his elevation to power over the Medes, nor over the Persians, nor the year of the fall of Babylon, but the year succeeding the two years during which “Darius the Mede” was viceroy in Babylon after its fall. At this time only (536 B.C.) Cyrus became actual king over Palestine. The edict of Cyrus for the rebuilding of Jerusalem marked a great epoch in the history of the Jewish people (2Ch_36:22, 2Ch_36:23; Ezr_1:1-4; Ezr_4:3; Ezr_5:13-17; Ezr_6:3-5). This decree was discovered “at Achmetha [R.V. marg., “Ecbatana”], in the palace that is in the province of the Medes” (Ezr_6:2). A chronicle drawn up just after the conquest of Babylonia by Cyrus, gives the history of the reign of Nabonidus (Nabunahid), the last king of Babylon, and of the fall of the Babylonian empire. In 538 B.C. there was a revolt in Southern Babylonia, while the army of Cyrus entered the country from the north. In June the Babylonian army was completely defeated at Opis, and immediately afterwards Sippara opened its gates to the conqueror. Gobryas (Ugbaru), the governor of Kurdistan, was then sent to Babylon, which surrendered “without fighting,” and the daily services in the temples continued without a break. In October, Cyrus himself arrived, and proclaimed a general amnesty, which was communicated by Gobryas to “all the province of Babylon,” of which he had been made governor. Meanwhile, Nabonidus, who had concealed himself, was captured, but treated honourably; and when his wife died, Cambyses, the son of Cyrus, conducted the funeral. Cyrus now assumed the title of “king of Babylon,” claimed to be the descendant of the ancient kings, and made rich offerings to the temples. At the same time he allowed the foreign populations who had been deported to Babylonia to return to their old homes, carrying with them the images of their gods. Among these populations were the Jews, who, as they had no images, took with them the sacred vessels of the temple.Darius - The holder or supporter, the name of several Persian kings.(1.) Darius the Mede (Dan_11:1), “the son of Ahasuerus, of the seed of the Medes” (Dan_9:1). On the death of Belshazzar the Chaldean he “received the kingdom” of Babylon as viceroy from Cyrus. During his brief reign (538-536 B.C.) Daniel was promoted to the highest dignity (Dan_6:1, Dan_6:2); but on account of the malice of his enemies he was cast into the den of lions. After his miraculous escape, a decree was issued by Darius enjoining “reverence for the God of Daniel” (Dan_6:26). This king was probably the “Astyages” of the Greek historians. Some are of opinion that the name “Darius” is simply a name of office, equivalent to “governor,” and that the “Gobryas” of the inscriptions was the person intended by the name. (2.) Darius, king of Persia, was the son of Hystaspes, of the royal family of the Achaemenidae. He did not immediately succeed Cyrus on the throne. There were two intermediate kings, viz., Cambyses (the Ahasuerus of Ezra), the son of Cyrus, who reigned from 529-522 B.C., and was succeeded by a usurper named Smerdis, who occupied the throne only ten months, and was succeeded by this Darius (521-486 B.C.). Smerdis was a Magian, and therefore had no sympathy with Cyrus and Cambyses in the manner in which they had treated the Jews. He issued a decree prohibiting the restoration of the temple and of Jerusalem (Ezr_4:17-22). But soon after his death and the accession of Darius, the Jews resumed their work, thinking that the edict of Smerdis would be now null and void, as Darius was in known harmony with the religious policy of Cyrus. The enemies of the Jews lost no time in bringing the matter under the notice of Darius, who caused search to be made for the decree of Cyrus (q.v.). It was not found at Babylon, but at Achmetha (Ezr_6:2); and Darius forthwith issued a new decree, giving the Jews full liberty to prosecute their work, at the same time requiring the Syrian satrap and his subordinates to give them all needed help. It was with the army of this king that the Greeks fought the famous battle of Marathon (490 B.C.). During his reign the Jews enjoyed much peace and prosperity. He was succeeded by Ahasuerus, known to the Greeks as Xerxes, who reigned for twenty-one years.(3.) Darius the Persian (Neh_12:22) was probably the Darius II. (Ochus or Nothus) of profane history, the son of Artaxerxes Longimanus, who was the son and successor of Ahasuerus (Xerxes). There are some, however, who think that the king here meant was Darius III. (Codomannus), the antagonist of Alexander the Great (336-331 B.C.).Ahasuerus- There are three kings designated by this name in Scripture.(1.) The father of Darius the Mede, mentioned in Dan_9:1. This was probably the Cyaxares I. known by this name in profane history, the king of Media and the conqueror of Nineveh.(2.) The king mentioned in Ezr_4:6, probably the Cambyses of profane history, the son and successor of Cyrus (529 B.C.).(3.) The son of Darius Hystaspes, the king named in the Book of Esther. He ruled over the kingdoms of Persia, Media, and Babylonia, “from India to Ethiopia.” This was in all probability the Xerxes of profane history, who succeeded his father Darius (485 B.C.). In the LXX. version of the Book of Esther the name Artaxerxes occurs for Ahasuerus. He reigned for twenty-one years (486-465 B.C.). He invaded Greece with an army, it is said, of more than 2,000,000 soldiers, only 5,000 of whom returned with him. Leonidas, with his famous 300, arrested his progress at the Pass of Thermopylae, and then he was defeated disastrously by Themistocles at Salamis. It was after his return from this invasion that Esther was chosen as his queen.Who was Esther?Easton's Bible Dictionary-------------------------EstherThe queen of Ahasuerus, and heroine of the book that bears her name. She was a Jewess named Hadassah (the myrtle), but when she entered the royal harem she received the name by which she henceforth became known (Est_2:7). It is a Syro-Arabian modification of the Persian word satarah, which means a star. She was the daughter of Abihail, a Benjamite. Her family did not avail themselves of the permission granted by Cyrus to the exiles to return to Jerusalem; and she resided with her cousin Mordecai, who held some office in the household of the Persian king at “Shushan in the palace.” Ahasuerus having divorced Vashti, chose Esther to be his wife. Soon after this he gave Haman the Agagite, his prime minister, power and authority to kill and extirpate all the Jews throughout the Persian empire. By the interposition of Esther this terrible catastrophe was averted. Haman was hanged on the gallows he had intended for Mordecai (Est_7:1-10); and the Jews established an annual feast, the feast of Purim (q.v.), in memory of their wonderful deliverance. This took place about fifty-two years after the Return, the year of the great battles of Plataea and Mycale (479 B.C.).Esther appears in the Bible as a “woman of deep piety, faith, courage, patriotism, and caution, combined with resolution; a dutiful daughter to her adopted father, docile and obedient to his counsels, and anxious to share the king's favour with him for the good of the Jewish people. There must have been a singular grace and charm in her aspect and manners, since 'she obtained favour in the sight of all them that looked upon her' (Est_2:15). That she was raised up as an instrument in the hand of God to avert the destruction of the Jewish people, and to afford them protection and forward their wealth and peace in their captivity, is also manifest from the Scripture account.”Also See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estherhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vashti (great granddaughter of Nebuchadnezer)
 
Jul 17, 2007
119
0
0
61
Biblical Timeline of Events---------------------------http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_kings_of_Persiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_an...srael_and_Judah(http://www.abiblestudy.com/part4.html#Return - See Also)(http://www.bibleworldhistory.com/Table5.htm - See Also)
BabPerBC.gif
Persian Achaemenid dynasty, 550–330 BC ----------------------------------------http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_II_of_PersiaCyrus II the Great, established the Persian Empire and ruled it from 550–529. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambyses_IICambyses II, his son, ruled 530–522. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SmerdisSmerdis, his alleged brother, ruled 522. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darius_I_of_PersiaDarius I the Great, son of Hystaspes, ruled 521–486. The epigraphic (Inscriptions) evidence for ancestors of Darius I the Great is highly suspect and might have been invented by that king.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerxes_Ihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AhasuerusXerxes I, his son, ruled 486–465. Darius in his inscriptions appears as a fervent worshiper of Ahura Mazda.Ahura Mazda is the name for a divinity exalted by Zoroaster as the one uncreated Creator, hence God.(Lost 2 Million Persian at Salamis against 300 Greeks)(Possible King to Esther)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artaxerxes_I_of_PersiaArtaxerxes I Longimanus, his son, ruled 464–424. Artaxerxes commissioned Ezra, a Jewish priest-scribe, by means of a letter of decree, to take charge of the ecclesiastical and civil affairs of the Israelite nation. A copy of this decree can be found in Ezra 7:13-28. Ezra thereby left Babylon in the first month of the seventh year (~ 455 BC) of Artaxerxes' reign, at the head of a company of Israelites that included priests and Levites. They arrived to Jerusalem in the first day of the fifth month of the seventh year (Hebrew Calendar).The rebuilding of the Jewish community in Jerusalem had begun under Cyrus the Great, who had permitted Jews held captive in Babylon, to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple of Solomon. A number of Jews had consequently returned back to Jerusalem in 537 B.C.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerxes_IIXerxes II, his son, ruled 424. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SogdianusSogdianus, his half-brother, ruled 424–423. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darius_II_of_PersiaDarius II Nothus, his half-brother and rival, ruled 423–404. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artaxerxes_II_of_PersiaArtaxerxes II Memnon, his son, ruled 404–358 (see also Xenophon). 586 BCE. Conquest of Judah (Southern Kingdom) by Babylon. Part of Judah's population, primarily the nobility, was exiled to Babylon. 559 BCE. Cyrus the Great became King of Persia.539 BCE. The Babylonian Empire fell to Persia under Cyrus. 550-333 The Persian Empire ruled over much of Western Asia, including Israel539 BCE. Cyrus allowed Sheshbazzar (Zerubbabel), to bring the Jews from Babylon back to Jerusalem. 520-516 The Prophets Haggai and Zechariah ompleted the Second Temple.444 BCE. The reformation of Israel was led by the Jewish scribes Nehemiah (Neh 1-6) and Ezra (Neh 8).
The festival of purim is celebrated in memory of God saving them. As you can see the knowledge I have does not see the superstition of your writings and understandings. It sees the actions of God Almighty keeping his promises to his people throughout history and working his purpose through.
Yes, as I can see You Have No Knowledge of History, Whatsoever. To call yourself a Historian, in any form of the word is a discredit to any academition. The fact that several generations might have pasted and possibly more than a half dozen Persian Kings reached the throne, shows you know as little about History, as you do the Bible. Since at least 1/4, to a good 3rd, maybe 1/2 of the Bible is History, you obviously have a clue what your taking about!Isa 44:21-28 Remember these, O Jacob and Israel; for thou art my servant: I have formed thee; thou art my servant: O Israel, thou shalt not be forgotten of me. I have blotted out, as a thick cloud, thy transgressions, and, as a cloud, thy sins: return unto me; for I have redeemed thee ...That frustrateth the tokens of the liars, and maketh diviners mad; that turneth wise men backward, and maketh their knowledge foolish ...That confirmeth the word of his servant, and performeth the counsel of his messengers; that saith to Jerusalem, Thou shalt be inhabited; and to the cities of Judah, Ye shall be built ... That saith of Cyrus, He is my shepherd, and shall perform all my pleasure: even saying to Jerusalem, Thou shalt be built; and to the temple, Thy foundation shall be laid.
 
Jul 17, 2007
119
0
0
61
Whatever words you want to call me or whatever insult you wish to convey I know it is not of God. And note I do not do likewise because I know whom it is I trust.
LØØK Lady this is my Post, You ripped me first, and I don't trust your judgement at all! Secondly, you obviously don't have a clue what I'm talking about, so don't insult me. Thirdly, please don't put words in my mouth, or tell me what my opinion is, when you haven't got a clue. I haven't stated an opinion, other than the "Evil Eye" exists, and its a form of envy, and its in the Bible. I make it my business to know my enemies, and I'm not dusted with a yellow streak down my back. Theres only 2 things I'm afraid of in this world as far as man goes: Stupid, Careless, and Reckless people with Opinions, and Stupid People with Power! The fact that the EVIL EYE exists in more than a few different forms in cultures around the world, as well as being directly referenced to by Christ himself in Mark 7:22, gives me more than enough right to post on it. The Fact that even up to modern times it has survived, is a tribute to itself. More than enough evidence can be supported that the development of this idea, has proceeded from the Eye Of Horus and other ancient forms concerning the "EYE," right up to modern times, seen in the "eye of providence" or the "All Seeing Eye" pictured on American currency. Not to mention, more fabled representations of the "Evil Eye" that occur in literature, such as the "the Eye of Sauron" in the Lord of the Ring Series by J.R. Tolkien, who was a confidant of C.S. Lewis of "Mere Christianity" and "The Screwtape Letters" fame, I might add!Please don't Post here, your fundamentalist trapping, your poor scholarship, and your backwater opinions aren't welcome here!I suggest, If you are interested that you read this link also, I think you suffer from some of the "EVIL EYE!"http://www.gospeltruth.net/1840OE/40...e_evil_eye.htmHere are some excerpts!!! Be Warned!I. WHAT IS IMPLIED IN SINGLENESS OF EYE.It implies disinterested love to Him. Unless this love be disinterested; that is, unless God is loved for what He is, for his own sake, and not for the sake of making ourselves happy; to honor Him is not a supreme or ultimate end; but our own happiness is the end, and the love and service of God merely a means for the promotion of that end.Luk 11:34 The light of the body is the eye: therefore when thine eye is single, thy whole body also is full of light; but when thine eye is evil, thy body also is full of darkness.II. WHAT IS IMPLIED IN AN EVIL EYE.An evil eye is that which has more than one object before it, or sees objects double. When this figure is applied to the mind it means, that state of mind in which objects are seen through a selfish medium, or when the mind has two objects in view, a legal intention to serve God, but an ultimate intention to serve self.Mat 6:23-24 If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness! No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. III. THAT SINGLENESS OF EYE WILL INSURE A KNOWLEDGE OF TRUTH AND DUTY.What can He mean, but that the soul that has but a single eye!1. Because it will beget honest inquiry.2. It will beget earnest, diligent inquiry.3. It will secure the right and the best use of the necessary means of knowledge.4. It will beget unfailing perseverance in the acquisition of knowledge.5. The state of the will, will not prevent the perception of truth and evidence.6. But the state of the will, will be such as to favor the perception, and insure the reception of evidence, when it is within its reach.Etc ... EceteraIV. AN EVIL EYE WILL INSURE DARKNESS AND DELUSION, BOTH IN REGARD TO DOCTRINE AND DUTY.And by a selfish mind, in this connection, is intended, one that is not in a state of entire consecration to God; but is influenced by selfish considerations. Darkness and delusion will be the natural and inevitable results of this state of mind: Because selfishness will prevent inquiry; especially honest, diligent, and persevering inquiry.REMARKSA selfish minister is a blind leader of the blind. Such a minister will certainly, in many things, mislead his flock. Selfish minds are very willing to be led, in matters of greed or want.This doctrine applies to the decision of every question of duty. If you are not conscious of a single eye, you cannot safely go forward in any thing. From this subject, it is easy to see why the Church and the ministry are so divided in their opinions. From this subject you can see the only true way of promoting real Christian Union. How many there are, who have great confidence in their own opinions.
 
Jul 17, 2007
119
0
0
61
This study is far from complete. But if you read it I hope you get the jest of it. If Esther was the Queen to Xerxes I, who just lost a million men to 300 Greeks at Salamis, this maybe is one reason why Vashti refused the King's orders, possibly. Then the Jews (at least of Jerusalem) were certainly in no great danger. Then the Edict of Haman was a political ploy of a Kenite to further agregate things, and possibly put another Kenite or Magi on the Throne of Persia, like Cambyses!TO DO: Add Bishop Ushers Biblical Time Reference and add an Event Line enforcing the idea the walls had been built in Jerusalem, Persia had just suffered a very Defeating Blow, this was a political move aimed at Persian Jews after "The Remnant" was already established. Prove once again Faithful's presumption's are based on false history, standard fundamentalist doctrine that doesn't support history, and has defended Kenite causes by her ignorance of it. Prove that Kenites, Nephinim, and Magi are the same, and that these returning scribes have tryed to skew the Bible, to show themselves in a more favorable light!