This guy lays out a good argument for Jesus's return in 70 AD. I'm curious for your thoughts IF you watch the 25-minute video.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I watched the video and thought it was interesting, I agree with him and absolutely agree with his method of determining what has been fulfilled, I just wish he would’ve included the verses that support this method of determining what’s been fulfilled.This guy lays out a good argument for Jesus's return in 70 AD. I'm curious for your thoughts IF you watch the 25-minute video.
I find that the many so-called theologians pick and choose both religious prophecies and historical events as their signposts with which to explain what the scriptures was saying.
However, just one wrong interpretation of scripture can send a person down the wrong rabbit hole of error.
The first error in peoples understanding is around Genesis 2:17 which is the first reference to people in the distant future, dying the second death, at the time of the final judgement at the end of the seventh age/generation. Many have argued about what the death was that was being spoken about by God because Adam surely did not die. When Adam sinned by eating the fruit of the forbidden tree, he literally became a candidate for the second death at the time of the final judgement.
Another wrong understanding of the scriptures is found in Exodus 20:4-6 where God foretold that the continual sinning of the fathers during the first and second ages of the existence of the Israelites, that these iniquities would be visited upon their children and the children's children during the third and the fourth age/generation of the existence of the nation of Israel. The end of the first two ages of the nation of Israel indulging in continual idolatrous worship ended with the birth of Christ at the beginning of the third age/generation of Isael's existence. In Daniel 9:24a, we read of God's grace towards the Nation of Israel where He gave the fathers of Israel and opportunity over 490 years to repent of their continual idolatrous worship of Idols. Israel did not take this opportunity to repent before the birth of Christ. So, in the Daniel 9:25b-26 we read of the foretold destruction of God's temple and the scattering of God's earthly hosts to the four corners of the earth over a period of two ages/generation when the war in Heaven between God's Angels and Satan's fallen Angels concludes and Satan is forced out of heaven to be gathered with the judged kings of the earth at Armageddon and imprisoned in the Bottomless Pit for 1,000 years before they are released for the little while period at the end of the Seventh Age. 2 Chronicles 7:12ff also speaks of the destruction of the temple and the scattering of the nation of Israel to the four corners of the earth and explains why God brought this disaster upon Israel.
Now I have used the same methodology as was suggested in the video justifying the Preterist's explanation of the events that took place around 70 AD.
Others, like Ellenor White, also used the same method to justify their reasoning and understanding of the scriptures.
I also above used the same methodology to justify my conclusions in explaining away the recorded historical events around 70 AD.
However, when the basis for my conclusions is flawed, then it becomes very easy for Satan to influence me to move further away from God's presented word so as to become an enemy of God.
Seeing God's big picture and being able to explain how God's Plan for the Salvation of all of the peoples of the world will unfold is becoming more difficult with the noise coming from all of the so-called soothsayers presenting their pet theories.
God has deliberately provided long periods of times between all of His Prophetic words so that it is difficult for people to comprehend or understand when the events will take place. It seems to me that there are many events that will occur in quick succession around a major event that happens that will often create uncertainty in our conclusions.
Preterist have difficulty in explaining God's Salvation Plan for all of the people of the earth.
Do they make any good points? Probably the point they make that our focus should always be on God regardless of How God's Plan pans out.
Before I read your post, can you tell me if you watched the video?
Yes, but I disagree with the conclusion that he has presented.
Thanks it was pretty good thanks. I don’t agree with every detail but I do with the majority of it. Jesus did come in judgement in that generation like He said that he would which proved that He was God.This guy lays out a good argument for Jesus's return in 70 AD. I'm curious for your thoughts IF you watch the 25-minute video.
I haven't watched it.Do you know the rapture one that he mentioned?
I don't deny that some of those manifestations as recorded by Josephus occurred prior to 70 AD.
But the guy is using those as part of his justifying to you that the other things he is saying about the return of Christ are true.
He is creating in your mind a story line to lead you down his way of thinking.
Yes.Also this guy has Christ remaining in heaven for the 'return' and not descending out of heaven.
Did anyone notice that?
Great point, Scott!This same Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will so come in like manner as you saw Him go into heaven.”