Randy, the little horn person stands up against the Prince of princes in Daniel 8:25. And shall be broken without hand, in that verse. Meaning not by human means.
The Prince of princes is Jesus.
The way Antiochus 4 opposed God, the "Prince of princes," was by attacking Orthodox Judaism, including the priestly system, its sacrificial system, its temple system. It is significant, I think, that both Messiah and the High Priest are called "the Great Priest."
Though Jesus, in his preIncarnate form, was certainly the object of hostility during the reign of Antiochus, his specific actions in both Dan 8 and Dan11 describe what he did in his attack of the worship of God. It was, in fact, very much an attack on the Word of God, aka the Christ.
"time of the end' phrase search in the online kjv bible reveals these results...
See 'time of the end' instances in the King James Version (KJV).
www.kingjamesbibleonline.org
A search will reveal the standard Dispensationalist, Futurist view, as well as other views outside the scope of this one, minority eschatological system. As I said, throughout Christian history scholarship has viewed "the time of the end" as referring to the end of a kingdom or the end of a particular dynasty. A simple search in Hub Commentaries for the verses in question will show you that.
I would add that Daniel's book condenses the "last days" as a period that only begins in the time when the Romans come to initiate the "Great Tribulation," which is, I believe, the Jewish Diaspora of the NT age. In other words, the "endtimes" encompasses both the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD and the entire period of the NT leading up to the resurrection and 2nd Coming of Jesus Christ.
In the specific context in which we read "time of the end" in Daniel, it is speaking of the end of the time of Antiochus 4 and his dynasty. The context indicates that in the clearest terms, I feel. Even though this would lead to the Great Tribulation beginning in the time of ancient Rome, the "time of the end" here specifically refers to Antiochus 4.
"time of the end" is not referring to the end of an Empire nor dynasty. But to when Jesus returns to rule the nations with a rod of iron.
Again, you are dogmatically stating something that stands against the scholarship and commentaries of much of Christian history. You should, at the very least, acknowledge that? Your view is a minority view among Christians.