Why don't you just TRY being honest - for once??
Like you? If I give grace for your poor recollection and not call that dishonesty, you can do it too, brother
First of all - I never said that there "weren't ANY" Catholic prophecies as you falsely claim.
When you were dismissing the sites along with the sources named for those Catholic prophesies, you came out looking that way.
I said that the Catholic Church doesn't have an official position on MOST of the prophecies on your link.
Yeah... after a dismissing sites as if there were no such thing as Catholic prophesies, you "finally" stated that.
Secondly - as I have stated ad nauseam - YOU are responsible for what you post - whether or not YOU are the one claiming it.
If you post from a spurious or dishonest site - it's YOUR responsibility.
The one article that used the term "Roman" in its title is not my fault. You wanted proof for why I believe the way I did about the Pope in representing the CC about a certain topic regarding salvation and I gave you one. Then you gave an excerpt from #846 from the Catholic catechism that proves my point. I can read the header that you provided before reading #846 proving my point. You just got mad and denied it as saying such plainly.
Then... in the midst of that discussion...
Posting links to articles about the existence of Catholic prophecies which was in turn a side bar note from a discussion with another Catholic poster about the Catholic prophesies citing the destruction of the Vatican... from which you joined in that discussion by insinuating that site was anti-Catholic and thus dismissing all Catholic sources for said prophesies .... even though the writer was a red pill Catholic.. etc and etc. remember now?
Finally - I couldn't care less what a charlatan like Jack Van Impe says about the Vatican.
I don't take his dishonesty any more seriously than I take YOUR dishonesty . . .
I do not like your poor recollection of the progress of this discussion and your main point for joining the discussion is to what? The same as you denounce Jack Van Impe for siting Catholic sources for those prophesies about Francis may be the very last Pope. You just want to deny it and you went ahead and called him dishonest. Why? What if the CC finally make an official statement on those Catholic prophesies to prove you wrong? If no official statement is forthcoming, should you not refrain from debunking and calling people dishonest les you appear to be dishonest yourself? Referring to Catholic prophesies is not being dishonest. It is a discussion about whether they think it will become true or not, regardless if it is an official Catholic source. Prophesies are that which has not come to pass yet. No one can say it is true or false, so there.
If you know your Catholic catechism well, what does # 675 - #677 says about the end? Or do you want to deny that official Catholic source too?
So go ahead and state ad nauseam all you want because you are responsible for what you post too, when you are being more argumentative with baiting and belittling rather than discussing with any one in meekness and gentleness and patience. You bite & devour and care not a wit how you come across. One thing I have learned, brother, is when a person protest way too much about anything, as in your case, other people's dishonesty, more than likely you are being dishonest yourself. When you accuse others of being obtuse or obstinate, the same can be said of you.
If you can't discuss this without the urge to bite, then don't bother replying at all. I'd say you are really mad at yourself for not seeing the truth and you still don't want to see the truth so what better way to deflect from the acknowledging the truth shown other than to attack the poster.
So keep on attacking posters without addressing the issue at all, in proving one way or another at all, and see what that gets you. Nothing.