How do we relate FATHER, SON, HOLY SPIRIT to humans?Now let’s apply this concept to the relationship between Humans, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.
Don't you believe it's a unique relationship between the three?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How do we relate FATHER, SON, HOLY SPIRIT to humans?Now let’s apply this concept to the relationship between Humans, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.
I've heard 3 or 4 different Hebrew names that people have suggested. To me it's conjecture. Meanwhile, we have what we know in truth.
Much love!
Other way around. How should we relate to them? Should we have a unique relationship with the Father, a unique relationship with the Son, and a unique relationship with the Holy Ghost? Or should we relate to them all the same?How do we relate FATHER, SON, HOLY SPIRIT to humans?
Don't you believe it's a unique relationship between the three?
“God is spirit” (John 4:24), so in that respect, God’s “substance” is something called “spirit” that can only be defined by a few speculated properties and by what it is not.God would have to be essence.
He certainly is not physical.
Does He have substance?
Jesus is a special case, because there are theological reasons for the claim that Jesus was (and still is?) “fully human and fully divine”.Jesus has substance.
Does He STILL possess substance?
That doctrine is from a human understanding of spiritual things.I don't care for the fact that you placed God in parenthesis.
Other than that, Yes, I agree.
Humanity, or Christianity, relates to God as 3 distinct PERSONS because the bible shows God to be a Father, a Son, and a Spirit.
IF the Trinity is not correct...
then we have three Gods.....which I'm having difficulty making another member understand.
The doctrine of the Trinity is found within the bible....
some sense had to be made of it.
@amigo de christothe preaching of the real gospel . not ecumenical dung . That wont be saving anyone .
We preach JESUS and who so ever beleives in him is reconciled to GOD .


Oh.Other way around. How should we relate to them? Should we have a unique relationship with the Father, a unique relationship with the Son, and a unique relationship with the Holy Ghost? Or should we relate to them all the same?
Cling always to the glorious LORD and abide by His SPIRIT for without him we can do nothing .Oh.
Yes.
Interesting question.
I DO believe that the relationship is different....
I believe it can be backed up by scripture.
The Father is referred to as the Creator, the Almighty, The Highest.
Jesus is also referred to as the above but He is described in the NT as the Savior,
the Truth, all the "I Am's". Our rabbi/teacher, the one we are to follow.
The Holy Spirit is known as the comforter, the paracleet, the one who will bring all to our memory, the one who will convict of sin.
So I tend to pray to Father...although also Jesus...seems I never pray to the Holy Spirit.
I thank Jesus for my salvation.
I look to the Holy Spirit for strength when it's necessary.
You?
My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one, Father, JUST AS YOU ARE IN ME AND I AM IN YOU MAY THEY ALSO BE IN US so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one AS AS we are one— 23 I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to COMPLETE UNITY. John17:20-23How do we relate FATHER, SON, HOLY SPIRIT to humans?
Don't you believe it's a unique relationship between the three?
You're a riot. I would look in the mirror of reflection once in a while. It just might do you some good and topple your ivory tower, as it should.I'm sure @Beebster is a nice person.
We're having a conversation - there's no problem here.
He thinks I'm misunderstanding him...
and I think I'm understanding him just fine.
As to the Trinity being true...
you've posted YOUR opinion...
which you tend to do .
I can only respond to scripture and I don't see any.
I believe he is a Binitarian Christian as you are a Trinitarian Christian and I am a true Monotheist Unitarian primitive Christian.Please provide scripture.
This is a new concept to me.
The Holy Spirit is represented as a Person.
Ephesians 4:30
30 Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.
It does not state that we are not to grieve GOD...
or even the spirit of God...
It states that we are not to grieve THE HOLY SPIRIT of God.
Just as the NT states The Son of God.....so it states the Holy Spirit of God.
John 14:26
26But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things
The Holy Spirit is referred to as a HE....
HE will teach you....
This is true in 3 languages, not only in the English translation.
John 15:26
26“But when the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me.
The Holy Spirit PROCEEDS from the Father...
Just as the Son does.
I like to discuss what the bible states....
not ecclesiastical authority - which could be wrong.
I never mentioned a Roman Government.
If I EVER mention the Council of Nicea it's to show that a council CONFIRMS what a Christian teaching is and the Council of Nicea CONFIRMED that Jesus is God.....
amidst some gnostic sects that were teaching that Jesus was a mere man.
Some might know this as Arianism.
No sir.
The fact that God is more than one PERSON is biblical.
Jesus is shown to be God in the NT writings.
This has nothing to do with govenments or culture.
Believing the NT IS a living faith.
When we do NOT believe what the Apostles taught it is then that we have a dead faith.
Jesus is God.
John 1:1
John 1:14
THE WORD WAS WITH GOD AND THE WORD WAS GOD. VERSE 1
THE WORD BECAME FLESH. VERSE 14
GOD BECAME FLESH.

Hi E,,,,That doctrine is from a human understanding of spiritual things.
Why confuse matters?Jesus said...My Father and I are ONE. One what? One Spirit. The Father sent His Spirit and whoever doesn't have the Spirit of Christ is not His. So then both Father and Son have a Spirit (actually these SHARE One Holy Spirit)...Are these Spirits also God? If there is ANOTHER separate Spirit on top of that that is God separately, then there are 5 Persons not three.
I know that in the OT the Spirit of God is sometimes referred to as feminine.In Hebrew the Holy Spirit is a thing not a person.....KODESH not KADOSH...and Spirit is FEMININE in Hebrew. Spirit is masculine in Greek.
Of course God IS spirit.How can a person be seen as opposite in gender based on language....UNLESS Spirit is an attribute of God....not a person apart from the one having the spirit?
I'm not God E.Paul compares us having a spirit with God having a Spirit. Unless you think your own spirit is a separate person....
I don't know what you think the above means.For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. 1 Cor 2:11
Paul is saying that God has let us know what God is thinking.Basically this is from Paul showing how little people understand spiritual things...hence the wanky doctrines...
Can anyone compare spiritual things with spiritual things? Pretty straightforward in this case.
I agree that in the Holy Spirit all Christians are one...My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one, Father, JUST AS YOU ARE IN ME AND I AM IN YOU MAY THEY ALSO BE IN US so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one AS AS we are one— 23 I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to COMPLETE UNITY. John17:20-23
According to Jesus, believers can be in Father and Son as they are in each other. How can believers be in Father and Son? Only through the Holy Spirit. 'JUST AS YOU ARE IN ME AND I AM IN YOU MAY THEY ALSO BE IN US
How can believers be as one?
Only through the Holy Spirit, there is no other way, of one heart and one mind in the Spirit, in complete unity.
And Jesus prayed: That they(believers) may be one AS AS we are one
Its all about the Holy Spirit
Yes, Jesus agreed with the Father on everything.Did Jesus agree with the Father on everything?
Do we?
Did Jesus always do the will of the Father?
Do we?
Jesus and God are One....
but not in the same way that we are One with Jesus.
Jesus is a divine Person..
we are not.
Agreed on all except one sentence:Yes, Jesus agreed with the Father on everything.
What don't you agree with that the Father stated?
Are we one as Jesus and the Father are one?
Jesus prayed we would be. However, we are obviously not, these websites are a good example of that. The more we yield to the Spirit's leading the more we would be as one, the closer we come to complete unity, as Jesus prayed for believers.
The Holy Spirit fully resides in Christ, or the fulness of the Godhead bodily dwells in him, so we are not one with Jesus as Father and son are one, for we only have a portion of the Spirit as it were They are one through the Spirit, for that is the only way we can be as one. But we are in Father and Son as they are in each other according to Jesus
The divinity of the Father fully rests in his son
No we do not always do the will of the Father
Well I mean this sincerely, Im glad we can agree on nearly all of it, that's much better!!Agreed on all except one sentence:
we are in Father and Son as they are in each other according to Jesus.
If you mean that we are required to abide in Christ
and Christ in us....then I agree.
You act like you actually have a case. Your position was rejected and marked at the council of Nicea. So yeah....I got something for you to. This is a heresy worth fighting.Do you really want to drive down this road SW? Think about it carefully before you tread into some s#$@ and quicksand. I have some planned for you if wish to continue. And it will be a very, very short dissertation, although for you, it will bury you.
You're such a sweet person JustMe.Do you really want to drive down this road SW? Think about it carefully before you tread into some s#$@ and quicksand. I have some planned for you if wish to continue. And it will be a very, very short dissertation, although for you, it will bury you.
Otherwise know as address every point ad nauseum in order to wear someone out. Prepare to have your position destroyed@shepherdsword I considered that driving through and hitting the quicksand, as I expected you might do, could be excessive and too time-consuming to dig you out, and you might jump out before then anyway.
Therefore, I'll use the "death by a thousand cuts" approach instead. It's better for both of us and more efficient timewise.
If you don't understand that Elohim is plural and claiming to be one(echad) then the reason for your misunderstanding is obvious.Let me begin at the top of your post and work my way down...racing away here as I'm late for other things to set up for tomorrow....
----------on Deut 6:4 and the use of echad – the unity in plurality (a compound found in one) versus simply one – not a compound intended-------
From your post...
Yes, "Elohim" is plural. "One" is "echad," or a composite unity. Let's examine its usage:
Ex 26:6, 11 – “the fifty gold clasps are used to hold the curtains together so that the tent would be a unit” (echad).
2 Samuel 2:25 – “many soldiers made themselves into one group” (echad).
Gen 34:16 – “the men of Shechem suggest intermarriage with Jacob's children to become one (echad) people.”
In Ps.133:1, the brethren are to dwell together as one (in unity). 1 Sam.3:17 calls them one company. 1 Kings 7:42 refers to one tribe. 1 Kings 11:13 calls Israel one nation.
--------------------------------
I’m not sure what Elohim has to do with 'echad' in the verse in question, so I’ll set that aside for now—maybe for another discussion
The purpose of their Unity pertains to creation and redemptionlater.
These eight verses highlight part of your argument to suggest that 'echad' means a plurality in one, I suspect.
What do all these eight verses have in common?
They all describe different ways 'echad' is used to refer to more than one entity or person coming together to fulfill a purpose.
Yes...it is. It is showing their unity in creation (Let US make made in OUR image) and redeemptionHowever, 'echad' in Deut 6:4 is not about completing a purpose
It represents a multiplicity in the Godhead that is declared to be "echad"or establishing a new identity foreign to a Hebrew. It affirms the nature of the one person, YHWH, known to be alone, the one and only God. It identifies the one God whom the people should worship with all their heart, mind, and soul every day—not a union or assembly of multiple entities. The context, as they say, is truly KING, and I believe you’ve overlooked this quality control aspect when interpreting scripture.
Do I need to post this again? It shows that Elohim(plural) is one "echad" YHWH. Look at it carefully:Read the next verse, Deut 6:5, if you will.
(Deut 6:5) “And you shall love Yahweh your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.”
Does this verse say or imply anything about multiple persons as one being? If, as you believe, 'echad' means unity among the three persons of God, why doesn’t the following verse instruct how to worship these various persons? Because it’s not about identifying or redefining who God is. 'Echad' in Deut 6:4 conveys the unique and solitary nature of the one God the people already knew.

It is stating that they are one in the purpose of creation and redemption and require the love and obedience of Israel.The fifty gold clasps have one purpose: to maintain the tent’s integrity. After assembly, the same fifty clasps can be used elsewhere for another purpose.
Similarly, many men form a unit or group for a purpose and plan. After assembly and reassembly for different purposes, the same men can be used elsewhere.
Intermarriage among one tribe of many common people would ensure the tribe’s integrity as one people.
The same applies to the different purposes in Ps 133:1, 1 Sam 3:17, 1 Kings 7:42, and 1 Kings 11:13.
In your words: “A man and a woman who come together in marriage are said to become one [echad] flesh. There are two persons, a man and a woman, coming together in marriage, and the two become one. Obviously, they do not become an absolute one, for they retain their separate personages; however, there is definitely a unity there.”
I’m glad you made that point that they remain two distinct people in marriage. That’s what marriage is about—the joining of two for a grand goal and serving many purposes as if truly one echad, though they really are not. Just like the Messiah Yeshua and his God, coming together as one for a major goal and accomplishing many purposes.
Deut 6:4’s 'echad' is not stating a purpose at all.