stunnedbygrace
Well-Known Member
well, I don’t know. I don’t think there are enough of them to read every post we generate and often only know a problem is happening because a few people report it? Or maybe someone reported but they made the decision that nothing wrong has occurred?So why was this thread allowed to remain?
No, the poster has not been banned - the poster is a staff member. Additionally, you can tell if someone has been banned because, usually, if you try to click on their profile page you can’t pull it up and get a message that says, “oops, page could not be found.“ I, personally, do not see that thinking the being Michael portrays Jesus is necessarily saying Jesus is not God. I have read WalterandDebbie literally state that Jesus is God. I haven’t studied how many times the word translated as “archangel” is even used in the Bible but it can’t be more than a few. And I’ve actually skimmed the “argument” and I could at least follow along with that argument, even though I do not agree and was not persuaded by the argument and think there’s not enough in it to determine the assertion.And was the poster banned? Walter and Debbie have a huge bunch of threads on Jesus being Michael the archangel (meaning that Jesus is NOT God). So why have they not been banned? Or have they been banned and we are not aware of it? Or do we have a two-tiered system so that heterodox doctrines trump orthodox doctrines?
But if I say I think “angel of the Lord” is Jesus hidden in the OT, that does not mean I necessarily think Jesus is not God, does it? It just means I think I can see, with some clarity and support, that a few people saw Jesus before His literal birth in human flesh occurred and were confused as to why they weren’t dead for having seen God face to face.
Does any of that make sense to you the way I explained it?
Last edited: