Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No, because "three days and three nights" is just a Jewish idiom.for three days. It's only our western literalist mindeset that tries to take it literally.rstrats said:Mungo,
re: "The point is that part of a day was still called a day...If I start painting a room on Friday afternoon, and carry on all Saturday, then start again on Sunday morning I might say to someone I've been painting this room for three days now."
But what if you started painting a room on Friday afternoon, and carried on all Saturday, then started again on Sunday morning and you said to someone that you've been painting the room for three days and three nights? Wouldn't you expect that person to think that at least a portion of each of the three nights would have to have been involved?
rstrats said:Mungo,
re: "No, because 'three days and three nights' is just a Jewish idiom for three days."
But how do you know that it is a Jewish idiom where three nights actually means two nights?
What examples from the first century or before do you have that show a period of time which is said to consist of a specific number of days and/or a specific number of nights where the period absolutely couldn't have included at least parts of each one of the specific number of days and at least parts of each one of the specific number of nights?
Webers_Home said:-
I suggest that the best way to begin sleuthing the chronology of Christ's
crucifixion and resurrection is to first define what constituters a Day and
what constitutes a Night. The creator does this for us so it's a no-brainer.
†. Gen 1:3-5 . . And God said: Let there be light-- and there was light. God
saw that the light was good, and He separated the light from the darkness.
God called the light Day and the darkness He called Night.
A normal chronology of evening and morning delineates night. However,Mungo said:Evening came, and morning followed
I see. When Genesis disproves your theory, all of a sudden we should stick to the New Testament. Hmmm!Webers_Home said:-
A normal chronology of evening and morning delineates night. However,
according to Gen 1:5, Gen 1:8, Gen 1:13, Gen 1:19, Gen 1:23, and Gen
1:31, evening and morning delineate day.
The Hebrew word for "evening" is ambiguous. It essentially means twilight.
However, there is no specific word for "afternoon" in the Bible, so sometimes
the Hebrew word for evening suffices for the hours between high noon and
sundown. Conversely, the Hebrew word for morning suffices for the hours
between sunrise and high noon; so that the combo "evening and morning"
used like that, delineate the hours of daytime rather than nighttime.
You can avoid the confusion by sticking with God's edicts at Gen 1:3-5 and
Gen 1:14-18 that Day is when the sun is up and Night is when the sun is
down. You can further avoid confusion by sticking with John 11:9 where
Christ's statement limits Days to 12-hour periods of sunlight; and seeing as
how the predictions recorded at Matt 12:40 and John 2:19-22 are his
statements too, then I suggest we go with what he said at John 11:9 and
define their days as 12-hour periods of sunlight.
======================================