You make decisions about the nature of God based on human maths? Really!kerwin said:My claim is based on math and the definition of nature.
That renders your two comparisons of God and nature irrelevant.
Even those who tried to reconcile the two knew that and so used the term "union of hypostatic" which essentially claims the two natures ares united in substance but don't ask me to describe what they mean because they do a poor job themselves.
Scripture teaches Jesus is united with the Spirit of God. Jesus has a physical human nature and the Spirit is the Spiritual nature of God and they are united because Jesus walks according to the Spirit through faith from first to last. A simple truth that was and is accomplished by the power and grace of God.
You say your claim is based on the definition of nature and then say my comparisons of God and nature are irrelevant!. Really!
Do you realise that God is a supernatural being?
Do you know what supernatural means? It means above and beyond nature
"(of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature" (Concise Oxford English Dictionary).
"unable to be explained by science or the laws of nature" (Merriam Webster).
Hypostatis
person 3
3 a : the substance or essential nature of an individual (Merriam Webster)
The hypostatic union is the union of two hypostasis (essences/natures). In Christ that means the union of the two natures/essences - human and divine - in one person.
As far as we know it is unique to God just at the Trinity is unique to God.
But then God is unique - Yes/No?
Your problem is that you want to make God in man's image and likeness. You want to be able to explain God. We can't. We can know nothing about God except that which he had revealed to us about himself.