Here's what I don't get. They are saying Hagedorn should not be a judge in the supreme court of Wisconsin because he is a Christian. But do they think judges write the law?? They only rule according to the written laws. Yes, there is "precedent", but that's just examining past decisions (precedents) which were given based on written laws. If the precedent was good use of the already existing laws, it can be used, unless or until someone finds a flaw in it.
So, if some judge happens to try to circumvent the law, based on his religion, there are higher courts to appeal to (thank goodness.)
Can no judge have a religion??
So, if some judge happens to try to circumvent the law, based on his religion, there are higher courts to appeal to (thank goodness.)
Can no judge have a religion??