I
Yeah, you're right - I should quit trying to help those who have fallen in to the deception of "orthodoxy" by talking about God's Word.
I'm speaking from the view point of God's Word, scripture so of course those claiming to be "orthodox" who admittedly accept ungodly teachings that come from outside of God's Word would claim those not in agreement with their extra biblical beliefs as being "ignorant"
It's funny that you people don't want to talk about your extra biblical beliefs which demonstrates the Whole Counsel of God is not accepted in so called "orthodox" churches which will end very badly for these folks.
For the most part, I don't believe there is truly something that is extrabiblical.
When folks claim that it is usually based on a perception and not on the totality of the Bible and all the customs and spiritual principles that can be derived from scripture. I have seen this time and time again no matter what the topic is whether it is Mary, Iconography, Call No Man Father, etc. There often is more going on than just the stuff being brought up by the Protestant.
Probably the best way I can relate this is to compare this to Theories of the US Constitution. There are all kinds of theories and ways of seeing the US Constitution that claim to be Constitutional. I am an Originalist in my take on both Christianity and the American Constitution but even in that basic orientation there are some big differences on "What the Founding Fathers intended" on principle, "Strict Constructionism" etc.
en.wikipedia.org
But as I have pointed out before if you study Church history most groups including heretical groups have a reverence for the Bible and are trying to follow its principles etc. Gnostic Sects, Manicheans, New Agers, and maybe Voodoo being the exception to the rule.
I have already mentioned Snake handling Pentecostals as a vivid example of how a proof text can be used, misused and abused. I will note in passing another one, namely Arianism. Now we cannot really discuss this topic due to terms of service issues but I am going to note in passing one issue of "being biblical", namely that of Proof texting (throwing out a dramatic sounding Bible verse as a gotcha thing vs. the opposite where your position is actually based on a empirical study of the Bible. There is a big difference between the two! Many Protestants like yourself and the ancient Arians tended to be proof texters, while the rest of ancient Christianity were more on the empirical end of things, that if you tied it with other things related to Church history etc.
And by the way things are not just about Tradition, there are other ones as well related to the Church as a Body that is led by the Holy Spirit. I am especially talking about terms like "Binding and Loosening" etc. mentioned in the Bible, "Things being established in the presence of two or three witnesses, and the fact that the disciples actually mentored the first bishops. Christianity is more that the Bible and Me under a Tree, it is actually a group and corporate thing per scripture and that is a fact!
Complete contents the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia.
www.jewishencyclopedia.com