archaeologist5
New Member
- Mar 3, 2011
- 124
- 0
- 0
So you think Noah cursed Canaan because _______. Sorry, but there are figures of speech that apply whether you like it or not. Noah cursed Canaan because Canaan was the child of Ham through his mother. It's not hearsay, it's SCRIPTURE!
please back this up with scripture and real evidence, not hearsay and without applying a law that comes into existence thousand years later backwards.
You're suggesting then, that not one married man in the history of time has slept with his mother?
don't put words in my mouth. i made NO such suggestion. please do not distort other people's words and posts.
#1. No, it didn't say Ham uncovered the nakedness but....Ham saw the nakedness.
Genesis 9:21-24 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
#2. No, it is written.
#3. It was important.
.
numbers aded by me for clarity:
#1. so what is your point? if he only saw it then he did not have incest andhad no 'love' child.
#2. it is heresy.
#3. to whom?