When GE says something, it's <FALSE>; when Davy says plus minus the exact same thing, it's <suspicious, then you simply have your head in the sand.>
So, yes, the <NEWER MODERN NT Bible versions started in the 1880s>, e.g., Darby's. So, yes, <when 19th century British scholars Wescott and Hort pushed their new Greek New Testament translation on the revision committee in 1881>, it more or less was exactly when <Darby published a translation of the New Testament in 1867>, FOURTEEN YEARS BEFORE 1881, and Eberhardt Nestle 1851 THIRTY YEARS BEFORE 1881 And since then, MORE OR LESS EXACTLY ALL... LATER BIBLE VERSIONS HAVE BEEN BASED ON THEIR (Westcott and Hort’s) CORRUPT GREEK TEXT REVISION, <INCLUDING> THE <NESTLE-ALAND> : <LATER BIBLE VERSION>--WHICH one of the <LATER 28 times 'revised'>?
And so more or less exactly we ended up with <ALL…THE UNITED BIBLE SOCIETIES' TRANSLATIONS>, indeed – <TRANSLATIONS> more or less exactly <revisions of His (God’s) Own Word> as per the <Nestle-Aland Greek text>…?? HAVEN’T YOU JUST EMPHASIZED IT’S AS PER THE WESTCOTT AND HORT?
Sorry, I forgot it’s ALL more or less exactly.
Fact of the matter remains more solidly than ever, THE LIE of the Roman Catholics and Bible societies, THAT NESTLE 1851 TO 1904 IS <THE BASES> OF ALL 20TH CENTURY TRANSLATIONS CLAIMED TO BE.
JOIN THE CHOIR OF ALL LIARS – IT’S ON YOUR CONSCIENCE. But ALL SUCH ‘versions’ / ‘editions’ whatever have been <BASED> ON NOTHING BUT ROMAN CATHOLIC indoctrination, coercion, pressure, dominance, black-mailing – every human subtlety and arrogance, ULTIMATELY AIMED AT ACCEPTANCE OF Roman Catholic CHURCH TRADITION ABOVE THE BIBLE.