ScottA
Well-Known Member
My point is, this is not a contest of who knows best.I don't know what your point is.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
My point is, this is not a contest of who knows best.I don't know what your point is.
Paul's thrust in Romans 5 is one that defines the good news as being for all people.....not just the electSpecifically?
Only the elect obtain salvation through faith while the rest are blindedPaul's thrust in Romans 5 is one that defines the good news as being for all people.....not just the elect
Thank you.While ὅς can be either “whom” or “that”, the masculine gender plus the context of being conformed to the image of His son argues persuasively for reference to a person, so “whom” would be the preferred translation.
The elect is the Jewish nation, but elect doesn't mean saved. Neither does predestined. Judas was chosen also, but not for salvation.Only the elect obtain salvation through faith while the rest are blinded
My desire when reading Scripture is to know the true meaning that the Apostles were teaching. They are the Apostles, not John Calvin.My point is, this is not a contest of who knows best.
How then do you define "apostle?"My desire when reading Scripture is to know the true meaning that the Apostles were teaching. They are the Apostles, not John Calvin.
Ephesians 1 he is writing to the Ephesians
Judas was chosen also, but not for salvation.
The Catholics did that.If true, then that would mean Jesus made an error by including the Book of Ephesians in His canon.
That is because 'context matters'.While ὅς can be either “whom” or “that”, the masculine gender plus the context of being conformed to the image of His son argues persuasively for reference to a person, so “whom” would be the preferred translation.
The Catholics did that.
Make sure you say “thank you” to them.
Yep. It must’ve been the Lord who impressed upon Marcion to eliminate the entire Old Testament, all the Gospels except a plagiarized version of Luke which he renamed “The Gospel of Marcion”, and all the non-Pauline epistles from the first Canon.The Lord is the One Who impressed upon people what to put in to His Canon and what to leave out.
Yep. It must’ve been the Lord who impressed upon Marcion to eliminate the entire Old Testament, all the Gospels except a plagiarized version of Luke which he renamed “The Gospel of Marcion”, and all the non-Pauline epistles from the first Canon.
How do you know that was Jesus?Jesus' canon has 66 books in it
How the Bible defines them. They were disciples of Jesus, but leaders in spreading the gospel. Jesus chose them. And they were given to Jesus by the Father.How then do you define "apostle?"
How do you know that was Jesus?
Do you believe John Calvin was an apostle? Jesus called his teachings "dead."
A general definition is simply: one sent by Christ. Which indeed began with the twelve by name, but continued with the seventy also, and a commandment to pray for more to be sent into His harvest.How the Bible defines them. They were disciples of Jesus, but leaders in spreading the gospel. Jesus chose them. And they were given to Jesus by the Father.
I know very little about John Calvin. But, how is it that Jesus "called his teachings dead"...didn't he live well after Christ was crucified and ascended?Do you believe John Calvin was an apostle? Jesus called his teachings "dead."
Scott, there are more than 1 office. Epheshian 4:11 "And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, 12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ,"A general definition is simply: one sent by Christ. Which indeed begin with the twelve by name, but continued with the seventy also, and a commandment to pray for more to be sent into His harvest.
The letters to the seven churches in Revelation 2 and 3 are also prophetic, but couldn't be seen as such until we can look back at church history and they are in order. Revelation 3:1 (Sardis) is the Reformation. Those at the very beginning, like Luther and Calvin had a reputation, "name" that they are alive, but they are dead." Then in verse 4 we see fighters against Calvinism who " 4 You have a few names even in Sardis who have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with Me in white, for they are worthy." That is obviously John and Charles Wesley. They were the forerunners of the Pentecostals, the Philadelphian church who kept all of God's word, thus were not cessationists that was a doctrine from Calvin, himself to remove the belief in the gifts of the Holy Spirit that are alive and well.I know very little about John Calvin. But, how is it that Jesus "called his teachings dead"...didn't he live well after Christ was crucified and ascended?