Brethren,
This pastor in one of his message mentioned about John 1:1 and interpreted it differently.
John 1:
1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with GOD, and the Word was God.
He said that the Word was FATHER GOD's very word from HIS mouth.
And as in vs. 14, he said the very Word of HIS 'manifested' as flesh in Mary's womb and was named Jesus.
Since sort of, Jesus also claimed that the word that comes out of His mouth is the FATHER''s.
To top it off, he said that no one came down from Heaven and Jesus was not the Word.
What do you reckon in the spirit about that, isn't something amiss here?
This pastor in one of his message mentioned about John 1:1 and interpreted it differently.
John 1:
1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with GOD, and the Word was God.
He said that the Word was FATHER GOD's very word from HIS mouth.
And as in vs. 14, he said the very Word of HIS 'manifested' as flesh in Mary's womb and was named Jesus.
Since sort of, Jesus also claimed that the word that comes out of His mouth is the FATHER''s.
To top it off, he said that no one came down from Heaven and Jesus was not the Word.
What do you reckon in the spirit about that, isn't something amiss here?