This assumes actual esigesis exists, it doesn't, it also assumes superstitions, also not existent. More strawman and ad hominem. A staple for you.
W
With a pretty flimsy explanation.
Look at your explanation:
1. You provide verses that do not state your theory.
2. You claim your theory is right because the words fall within the possible meanings.
3. You claim context dictates your conclusion although you cannot explain how when others come to a completely different conclusion from the context AND can explain why.
4. You have claimed your theory is implied in Scripture although not explicitly stated because that is how you believe theology is done.
The reason your theory is eisegesis is because not only is your theory not stated
in the text of Scripture but you cannot even explain how it can be derived
from Scripture except it be assumed.