If you listen to the executive of Dominion, if a vote needs auditing, you can make changes to how the vote will be handled but you never change the original image, so keeping the integrity of the count and system but allowing for necessary adjustments. Rather than a flaw in the process this is a benefit, because the process is not perfect, machine mistakes will occur and need correction.
With this being a manual process fully recorded you could review how many such changes were made and their consequences quite easily.
I understand the logic behind such system design, but to critics they would call this a failure, not seeing power has to be given to the user rather than the machine to provide the ability to handle exceptions to the expected results. It would be a criticism if the machines incorrectly read some ballots to the wrong party, and there was not the facility to correct the machine mistake.
In the end to critics who are intent on spreading discord and conflict, everything is wrong and corrupt, which is an absurd uncaring and aggressive approach to take towards innocent poll workers.
God bless you
As a side point, if one finds ones heart finding the innocent guilty one has left Jesus a long way behind, and wondered into a spiritual realm Christians should not go.
The fact that you will listen to someone who is an executive for a company THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN PROVEN to have machines that can and have been rigged is astounding. It just shows how badly you have been deluded.