Question for Amill's only

[Timtofly]

Another lie from you. Amillennialism, in and of itself, does not claim that Premils believe that Jesus stops reigning when the thousand years ends. You don't have to be an Amill in order to be familiar with scriptures like Isaiah 9:6-7 which teach that He will reign forever.

Then why do Amil constantly bring up the point Jesus does or does not stop reigning?

Jesus stopping His reign is not even relevant to Revelation 20 in the least little bit. Since His reign is eternal, it has no beginning nor end. Thus not relevant to Revelation 20.

Revelation 20 is a about a beginning and an end of a particular 1,000 year period of time. Not a symbolic time frame as Amil teach. Symbolism really has no definite beginnings nor endings.

 

[Davy]

Then why do Amil constantly bring up the point Jesus does or does not stop reigning?

Jesus stopping His reign is not even relevant to Revelation 20 in the least little bit. Since His reign is eternal, it has no beginning nor end. Thus not relevant to Revelation 20.

Revelation 20 is a about a beginning and an end of a particular 1,000 year period of time. Not a symbolic time frame as Amil teach. Symbolism really has no definite beginnings nor endings.

And that excuse by those on Amill I have heard many times, trying to scrap Jesus' future "thousand years" reign by wrongly assuming His reign ends after that period.

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

Then why do Amil constantly bring up the point Jesus does or does not stop reigning?

We don't. This is yet another thing that you make up in your imagination. No one here claims that He stops reigning when the thousand years ends, so that's not something that we need to talk about.

 

[Timtofly]

We don't. This is yet another thing that you make up in your imagination. No one here claims that He stops reigning when the thousand years ends, so that's not something that we need to talk about.

Then why are you posting about it, if you claim you do not?

We are not talking about stopping. We are talking about the point it has not started yet. The Millennium has not started. Jesus is still reigning now, even though the millennium is still future.

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

Then why are you posting about it, if you claim you do not?

Because the topic was brought up, but we don't talk about it constantly as you falsely claimed. Do you know the difference between talking about something rarely or occasionally and talking about something constantly?

We are not talking about stopping. We are talking about the point it has not started yet. The Millennium has not started. Jesus is still reigning now, even though the millennium is still future.

The Millennium has not started but Jesus is still reigning now? That is total gibberish. It's impossible to make any sense of your beliefs.

 

[Timtofly]

Because the topic was brought up, but we don't talk about it constantly as you falsely claimed. Do you know the difference between talking about something rarely or occasionally and talking about something constantly?


The Millennium has not started but Jesus is still reigning now? That is total gibberish. It's impossible to make any sense of your beliefs.

The millennium is for those in the final harvest. Of course Jesus is reigning now. They are not, because the Second Coming has not happened yet.

You have the totally wrong idea of the Millennium, and Scripture is gibberish to you.