ATP said:
really?? you are going to break down my OP like that.
If you didn't want to hear the answer that no rainbows are not a sign all is well in the land and rather wanted a discussion about Noah, then you should have posted that.
But you didn't. And so I answered based on the question presented.
It would be like me asking if everyone liked chocolate and when some one said I don't like chocolate I replied with a retort about waffles.
When they asked what that had anything to do with chocolate I could hastily add well your can put chocolate on them do its the same idea.
Now would that sound mad? I think it would.
Or did your just post that to elicit the response, yeah God is awesome?
Look if you want to praise God on rainbows then simply state God makes awesome rainbows didn't he?
To which then, I can reply, yes he does great work.