Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It does say: "But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived."The world is a better place, right now, than it ever has been, by any measure a human might care to use! And we even have metrics and websites to track them. Aside from some recent spikes, pretty much anything we might consider “evil” has been on a long decline."
Agree - this is well documented, example - see Steven Pinker TED talk. But our world is still a long way from perfect because of the presence of evil. God will restore a perfectly righteous universe at the end times via creation of the new heavens and Earth and "New Jerusalem".
I think nonbelievers rejection of God is mostly due to ;
- they demand a specific type of scientific evidence
- they cannot resolve the "problem of evil" (epicurus paradox")
And Jesus said that those who reject Him do so, because light came into the world, but they love darkness and hate the light, in John 3.hs,
Rom 1:18-20 (NLT) gives this reason:
18 But God shows his anger from heaven against all sinful, wicked people who suppress the truth by their wickedness.a]">[a] 19 They know the truth about God because he has made it obvious to them. 20 For ever since the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky. Through everything God made, they can clearly see his invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse for not knowing God.
The truth of God's existence is obvious to (all) people but they are blinded to it by their wickedness. The remainder of Rom 1 tells of the kinds of wickedness they engage in to suppress God's truth.
This leaves them with "no excuse" before God.
Oz
I think nonbelievers rejection of God is mostly due to ;
- they demand a specific type of scientific evidence
- they cannot resolve the "problem of evil" (epicurus paradox")
They are spiritually blind and unless God enables them to see, they won't ... they can't.I think nonbelievers rejection of God is mostly due to ;
- they demand a specific type of scientific evidence
- they cannot resolve the "problem of evil" (epicurus paradox")
There's one reason you didn't mention: unbelievers see the poor example that is often set by adherents of Orthodox Christianity. Many of these adherents' actions and words don't resemble those of Christ's at all.
Or Shame?op: Rejection of God MOSTLY because of?:
EVIL heart of UNBELIEF!
I believe you are looking at it from the wrong perspective. When considering why someone doesn't believe something it is helpful to assess why they would believe a particular thing in the first place. So the better question is why doesn't everyone accept your, or more broadly the Christian concept of deity?I think nonbelievers rejection of God is mostly due to
What logical, evidence-based reason would a person have for coming to the conclusion that the origin of that which we enjoy is from your concept of deity?But people are too blind to see that those mercies and blessings come from God.
What do you mean about my 'concept of deity'? Sorry this thread is so old I have forgotten the point of it so forgive me. If you go back to post number 11 and follow thread you will see my comments in context.What logical, evidence-based reason would a person have for coming to the conclusion that the origin of that which we enjoy is your concept of deity?
I believe you are looking at it from the wrong perspective. When considering why someone doesn't believe something it is helpful to assess why they would believe a particular thing in the first place. So the better question is why doesn't everyone accept your, or more broadly the Christian concept of deity?
That's very simple.What logical, evidence-based reason would a person have for coming to the conclusion that the origin of that which we enjoy is from your concept of deity?
Nope, millions, perhaps billions throughout time don't so the above statement is DEFINATIVELY false and a flat out lie at worst or wishful thinking and projecting at best.Deep down we all sense there is a GOD.
Oh, personal bias, that's trustworthy........experiential evidence - a personal relationship with God
My body is the direct product of two humans I called mother and father procreating. Their involvement does NOTHING to prop up your claims regarding divinity.Now look around you or even think about your own anatomy and the intricate detail. Could it all have come together on its own without a Creator?
Actually, that's what it sounds like you are doing. You have a preconceived belief and instead of searching for answers you have predetermined an answer and attempt to pigeonhole things into the construct of your preexisting bias.So you choose to IGNORE the evidence which is right in front of you.
Stop presenting yourself as the authority. These debates can be fruitless for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is the arrogance expressed in your statement above. The sad part is, you probably think you're being humble. "Unless you are one of us you won't understand!" How Pharisee like...…True Christians vs non-believer debates are mostly pointless because its not a level playing field.
I am not talking about that. Spend some time studying all the systems within the body -- the skeletal, muscular, circulatory, nervous, digestive, reproductive, and immune systems. Do you really think that they could have been designed without a Creator?My body is the direct product of two humans I called mother and father procreating.
I don't know how genetics work well enough to tell how the how. I am honest enough to say I don't know and not add in my preferred deity concept as a place filler for my lack of understanding.Do you really think that they could have been designed without a Creator?