- Aug 10, 2016
- 3,199
- 1,802
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- Australia
Okay...so, I know this can be a bit of a boiling point, conversation wise. And, well I'm not really posting this thread with the intent of setting off an argument. It's just something that's been bugging me for quite a while now, and...well, I want to talk about it.
So, I'm Amil...although the more I read, the more I'm coming to realize that I'm only Amil on the issues of the Millennium. On all the issues before that...I just don't know!!
Anyway, one of the criticisms Amil's get leveled at them all the time, is that they believe in "replacement theology". And then a whole lot of, what I would call, incorrect, descriptions follow that accusation. And it would bug me, because I'd be..."I don't know any Amil's who actually believe that...!"
And yet the other day (and I'm very frustrated that I can't remember where I heard it) I heard something that made me think that there are, indeed, those out there that hold to a supersessionism that perhaps defies biblical belief.
Which makes me wonder what I hold to...?
I see a future for National Israel. But a future where they recognize Jesus as their Messiah. I see that the Church has been grafted into the true Israel, but not replaced it.
But then, what do we make of verses like these:
But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. 10 Once you were not a people, but now you are God's people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy. - 1 Peter 2:9-10
Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, “And to offsprings,” referring to many, but referring to one, “And to your offspring,” who is Christ. - Gal 3:16
These verses suggest that: 1 - Peter gives to us the titles that were once only given to the Jews, and 2 - that the promises given to Abraham were actually made to Jesus.
What do we make of these? In light of other scriptures, in light of current events?
So, I'm Amil...although the more I read, the more I'm coming to realize that I'm only Amil on the issues of the Millennium. On all the issues before that...I just don't know!!
Anyway, one of the criticisms Amil's get leveled at them all the time, is that they believe in "replacement theology". And then a whole lot of, what I would call, incorrect, descriptions follow that accusation. And it would bug me, because I'd be..."I don't know any Amil's who actually believe that...!"
And yet the other day (and I'm very frustrated that I can't remember where I heard it) I heard something that made me think that there are, indeed, those out there that hold to a supersessionism that perhaps defies biblical belief.
Which makes me wonder what I hold to...?
I see a future for National Israel. But a future where they recognize Jesus as their Messiah. I see that the Church has been grafted into the true Israel, but not replaced it.
But then, what do we make of verses like these:
But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. 10 Once you were not a people, but now you are God's people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy. - 1 Peter 2:9-10
Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, “And to offsprings,” referring to many, but referring to one, “And to your offspring,” who is Christ. - Gal 3:16
These verses suggest that: 1 - Peter gives to us the titles that were once only given to the Jews, and 2 - that the promises given to Abraham were actually made to Jesus.
What do we make of these? In light of other scriptures, in light of current events?