Why do you keep doing this to yourself!
You criticize me, then make a bunch of errors...even against you and your relatives.
You have totally misunderstood and incorrectly defined the abomination of desolation. And this you have done by the teachings of men, while Jesus Himself gave the correct interpretation. He was referring to
Daniel 8:13:
Then I heard a holy one speaking; and another holy one said to that certain one who was speaking, “How long will the vision be, concerning the daily sacrifices and the transgression of desolation, the giving of both the sanctuary and the host to be trampled underfoot?”
Doing what? correctly dividing the word of truth.
If you had read Daniel 8, you would have relaized it was talking about teh Grecian conquest and control of Israel. That is a thing of the past.
Jesus was referring to the Daniel 9 AOD:
6 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
And if you were consistent with grammar you would realize Jesus did not speak of a past event but a future event still to come.
As for my relatives. None live in Jerusalem nor are any Jewsih so it doesn't apply to my family.
The abomination of desolation is what is called the antichrist- a person. Paul says he will enter the temple, declare himself to be god and cause the overspreading of abominations and will make desolate. That is a future temple which will be built.
And He, Jesus, gave the time of "
the host to be trampled underfoot", saying:
And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.
Luke 21:24
Wrong again. Failed exegesis and lousy eisegesis!
This statement refers
1. To he beginning of the times of the gentiles which began in 587 BC.
2. The Luke passage of the Olivet discourse for the most part refers to the 70AD judgment when Rome destroyed the temple and were led away captiv and since went into all nations.
3. The Assyrian, Babylonain, Medeo-Persian,Grecian captivities did not accomplish that!
But--what--you also think that some pig or an enemy of God standing in the Temple of God, is more noteworthy than the Son of God standing condemned to death in the holy city, is therefore is more worthy to be prophesied 500 years before Christ and written of in the word of God?
This is such an assinine statement. Gods Word both prophesied of Jesus dying and a future persecution of the jews. It is rampant through the prophets. Both are noteworthy for completely different reasons. It is not a question of wqorthiness, that is a straw man on your part, but each has its own soense of worth