No, it's a term "sons of God" as fallen angels consistently read INTO Scripture by those who are still following the doctrine that some theologians believe originated through the teaching of angels from Enoch. His knowledge of angels is believed to be one of the reasons the early church leaders felt his doctrine was not inspired by God and therefore omitted it as belonging to Holy Writ.
The Old Testament NEVER calls humans "sons of God"????
The Manifestation of the Sons of God
The New Testament boldly refers to the great "manner of love the father has given unto us, that we should be called
the sons of God." (I John 3:1) While the emphasis is on God's love, the text pointedly tells us that, as a result of the New Covenant, it is the
Christians that are now to be considered "the sons of God."
In the Old Testament, we see that the
angels were referred to as "the sons of God." In the book of
Job, in a very instructive series of passages, we find "there was a day when the
sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and
Satan came also among them." (Job 1:6). The phrase "sons of God" (B'nai Elohim) is also used in conjunction with the notorious
Nephilim account wherein the
fallen ones (Nephilim) "came in unto the daughters of men" and mated with human women. In the reference in the book of
Job, we also learn that these "sons of God" were present when the LORD created the world.
It is self evident that these fallen angels have
forfeited the privilege of being referred to as the sons of God. However, there were many of the angels that did
not take part in Lucifer's great rebellion and, as such, must
still be considered
sons of God. Indeed, in
Revelation we see an
angel tell
John that he is of his "brethren" - an apparent reference to a spiritual kinship that speaks of a familial relationship between the redeemed human "sons of God" and the ancient "sons of God" seen in the angelic host. (Revelation 19:10; 22:9)
In the book of
Romans, the
Apostle Paul refines our understanding of the qualifications for this blessed position when he states that "as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God." (Romans 8:14). It should be readily apparent that the Spirit of God leads all who will follow to the person of
JESUS CHRIST. Thus, the
identity of the
sons of God is relational to the
identity and
response to the activities of the "Spirit of God."
This is a significant understanding, for in it we can see that God did not sever the sonship of the "angels that kept not their first estate" simply because they sinned in the great angelic revolt. The logic found in the reference in
Romans is indicating they lost their prior standing when they refused to allow the
Spirit of God to continue to "lead" them.
Throughout the New Testament, we find the concept that the actions and deeds of created beings demonstrate
which Spirit their lives are manifesting. The classic example is found in the confrontation between
YAHSHUA (Jesus' Hebrew name) and the unregenerate establishment priests commonly referred to as the
Pharisees.
In that illustrative account, the Jewish leaders were following a 'Spirit of religion,' and it had led them astray. Seeking to repudiate Christ's emerging position in the LORD's wonderful program for the salvation of Israel, they defensively stated "Abraham is our father." (John 8:39).
This statement was clearly intended to affirm their historical standing as the
seed, or children of Abraham. It was to Abraham that many key prophetic promises were made and,
using the scriptures, the priesthood sought to claim that their legitimacy was derived from their relationship to Abraham. Although Jesus conceded "I know that ye are Abraham's seed," he contrasted that statement by pointing out that "ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you." (John 8:37)
The Lord then speaks about
spiritual parentage as he informs the priests that "I speak that which I have seen with my father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father" (John 8:38). After Jesus firmly implies they
cannot be the offspring of Abraham because they were not doing the
works of Abraham (John 8:39), the confrontation narrows to the subject of
spiritual lineage.
This exchange is one of the most divisive moves in Christ's earthly ministry. In this crucial interaction,
Jesus cuts to the heart of the conflict, and the direction that he turns his mission leaves no doubt whatsoever that he considers the Jewish religious establishment to be of the most vile character imaginable.
Jesus bluntly informs the Judean religious leadership that their works
manifest whose children they are:
"Ye are of your father the devil. And the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him, when he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44).
Before this fiery denunciation is over,
JESUS will have called the priestly leaders liars, murderers, and those that have used their position to lust after their own desires. The stinging repudiation was all the more egregious as the elders were categorically told by
Jesus that he is, indeed,
deity (John 8:58). The predictable result of this spiritual collision was an attempt at
murdering Jesus of Nazareth through stoning.
What is truly amazing in this passage is how deep this truth actually runs. So-called "Christian" interpreters of every stripe have taken this passage and sought to bend it to validate their own perspective. Of course, any perspective apart from the pure truth of God is not their own, for this text itself tells that it is but a
manifestation of whose child they are.
The
Aryan Nations have tried to turn this passage into some bizarre biological doctrine wherein they claim Jesus was telling us the Jews are physical descendants of the devil - the so called 'serpent seed' doctrine. The
Catholics have tried to show this means that God abandoned the Jews and
their "church" has
replaced Israel in the Lord's great plan.
The
Rapture Cult has stated that Christ's program of salvation put the Jews into what they call a "parenthesis" - sort of a theological holding pattern - until all the Gentiles that are scheduled to be saved come to salvation. They then say the "church" gets "raptured" and then the Jews are back on the 'front burner' again in the final "dispensation."
The
Preterist Apostasy tells us the devastation of Jerusalem in 70 AD concluded the tribulation, and that Christ has
already returned. This blasphemy postulates that the "tribulation" was God was bringing about a final end of the Jewish era, and forcing the Christian church to take a path independent of its predecessor role as a Jewish sect with a post-messianic perspective.
All these doctrinal groups (and many others with variations on a theme) are in a
fatal error - and as they continue to cling to their error,
they are demonstrating that they are spiritually related to the unregenerate Pharisees.
Jesus Christ's word are even more breathtakingly relevant right now than they were then - "He that is of God, heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God" (John 8:47).
...continued...