The Many-Worlds-Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics states that rather than a mesurement collapsing the wave function to a definite outcome, instead there is an always branching that accounts for the whole of creation, as we shall see, for, you see, a particle is within the domain of the universe and by MWI must be everywhere making the exact same decision as to where to turn, every turning taken and evry new position with the same decision to make and outcome entailed so that the original particle can be thought an original individual whom has unlimited potential to move anywhere to make the exact same decision. Let us think this through:
Let us say that the thought to have have a cup of tea arises within me and I decide to go to the shops to attain the tea making ingredients, or I decide to have a coffee instead, or I decide to just continue as I am doing. Let us say I do the first - on the way I am presented with ever more options, every thought a new branching entailing. Now, the branching is not only a real world branching but an actual branching onto a new world where one is still sat on the couch without even yet having had the thought of tea. Some interesting moral questions follow from this:
i. if the universe is a conglomeration of the same particle which is equal with itself at every location and yet each have yet to move then it not that there no particle but that only The One exists and it projects inwards - not outwards - its possibilities creating its own universe in which it exists as the universe. We are mind, the mind is such a particle, therefore there is only I in a dream of myself with infinite faces. Now if I am the same and yet different from myself then I am entangled with the entire universe that all comes down to one decision - to act or not to act - and this question rests with the one question: who/what am I? If I can answet this then I know what movement I am supposed to make but then I would be determined, hence not knowing is the possibility for free movement and so knowing. This is not to say that absence is what we must embrace, no, but yes, only, though of positively as plenitude shared out equally. Therefore what we learn is that we share an essence with absolutely everyone who we are capable of instant communication with.
i.b. now, if there is but one particle that turns inwardly then it has to have dimension - the point which is at least a line and the area it marks out on its axis - for every possibility of/for its placement must exist -, being the domain in which potential infinity entails an infinity of potential. Yet, and here is the thing, no space is engaged by the particle as yet for space is entailed only on the answer of the question and direction given. Therefore the I is a non-physical enterprise, as is the universe, the material an appearance when one accepts the absence as plenitude and not as space entailing absence. So, this is the problem and absence, if we are to realize our true spiritual self, must be overcome. Now, what have we just deduced: an immaterial I am which we all share in the essence of.
Let us say that the thought to have have a cup of tea arises within me and I decide to go to the shops to attain the tea making ingredients, or I decide to have a coffee instead, or I decide to just continue as I am doing. Let us say I do the first - on the way I am presented with ever more options, every thought a new branching entailing. Now, the branching is not only a real world branching but an actual branching onto a new world where one is still sat on the couch without even yet having had the thought of tea. Some interesting moral questions follow from this:
i. if the universe is a conglomeration of the same particle which is equal with itself at every location and yet each have yet to move then it not that there no particle but that only The One exists and it projects inwards - not outwards - its possibilities creating its own universe in which it exists as the universe. We are mind, the mind is such a particle, therefore there is only I in a dream of myself with infinite faces. Now if I am the same and yet different from myself then I am entangled with the entire universe that all comes down to one decision - to act or not to act - and this question rests with the one question: who/what am I? If I can answet this then I know what movement I am supposed to make but then I would be determined, hence not knowing is the possibility for free movement and so knowing. This is not to say that absence is what we must embrace, no, but yes, only, though of positively as plenitude shared out equally. Therefore what we learn is that we share an essence with absolutely everyone who we are capable of instant communication with.
i.b. now, if there is but one particle that turns inwardly then it has to have dimension - the point which is at least a line and the area it marks out on its axis - for every possibility of/for its placement must exist -, being the domain in which potential infinity entails an infinity of potential. Yet, and here is the thing, no space is engaged by the particle as yet for space is entailed only on the answer of the question and direction given. Therefore the I is a non-physical enterprise, as is the universe, the material an appearance when one accepts the absence as plenitude and not as space entailing absence. So, this is the problem and absence, if we are to realize our true spiritual self, must be overcome. Now, what have we just deduced: an immaterial I am which we all share in the essence of.
