You do not love the truth, so you try to suggest alternatives which no one supports, and then you want others to follow it...not much there to say the least.
I believe that you are speaking of another person who suggested alternatives that no one wanted to hear or follow, and He was called a person who did not love the truth. In fact, this person fulfilled Biblical Prophecy which the so-called religious leaders of his time did not understand.
You claim that history supports your tradition, but as I pointed out previously the historical record provided many other possibilities that would comfortably fit your beliefs like a glove.
Yet, when I point out historical facts that confirm the fulfilment of some recorded biblical prophecies, your silence is deafening in the lack of support that you provide in those cases as it disproves your theory that the Roman Empire is the fourth segment of the Daniel 2 Statue prophecy, yet the historical fact shows otherwise.
You have stated that I "do not love the truth" yet your own actions and opinions demonstrate that it is you and your denomination that has scant regard for the truth.
Goodbye, you are a part of the weakest link.