The last days “man of sin” is a Jewish prince, so say the scriptures.Fact; The only way to truly understand last days prophecy is to study the text from it's original language. The definitions of some of the key Hebrew and Greek words from those prophecies are far to complex to be understood from our English translations.Fact; The last days man of sin is mentioned in both the Old and New Testaments. Most of the knowledge that the apostles had concerning this man of sin was foretold by the prophets in the Old Testament. Jesus even referred to Daniel and the abomination of desolation of the antichrist when speaking of the end times.Mat 24:15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand) Then a warning from christ that is repeated in Rev 13.Mat 24:23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. Mat 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Rev 13:13 And he (False prophet i.e. second beast) doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, Rev 13:14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. If you study the Gospels you will find that Jesus never went into great detail about this figure. He made cryptic mentions of him a few times. Once he referred to him when he said to the Jewish people; Joh 5:43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. How do I know he was referring to the last days man of sin and world leader? Simple deductive reasoning. Jesus is the Messiah. The Jews rejected him and he said they would will accept someone else as their Messiah. Would the Jews ever accept a non Jew as their Messiah? Not a chance.Fact;The Laws of Moses and the writings of the prophets demand that the Messiah be descended from the lineage of David, a Jew. Even an atheistic Jew would never have a non Jewish leader. Name one non Jewish prime Minister of Israel. Name one Leader of a Jewish organization that is not a Jew. Is there anyone else in prophecy that matches this description? Yes, The prince in Daniel 9:25-27 the same one that breaks the covenant and sets up the abomination of desolation. He is also described in Daniel chapter 11 where he becomes King and rules from Mt Zion (the “holy mountain” and temple mound) in Jerusalem. (Dan 11:31,36,45)Now we come the the most decisive scriptures identifying this last days “man of sin”.Ezekiel 21:25-2725: And thou, profane wicked prince of Israel, whose day is come, when iniquity shall have an end, 26: Thus saith the Lord GOD; Remove the diadem, and take off the crown: this shall not be the same: exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. 27: I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it: and it shall be no more, until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him.As I said at the beginning, you must study the scriptures from the text of the original language. The definitions of the translated words are not always the same.Right off the bat we find a problem with the English translation. The word ‘profane’ in verse 25 describing this “profane wicked Prince of Israel” is translated wrong in the King James version. According to the Strongs Exhaustive Concordance the Hebrew word that ‘profane’ was translated from is chalal, châlâl {khaw-lawl'}, and this word is used 94 times in the Old Testament. It was translated; ‘slay’ 78 times, ‘wounded’ 10 times, ‘profane’ 3 times and that includes this time, it was translated ‘kill’ twice, and ‘slain man’ once. The correct translation is “slain, fatally wounded, or pierced.” The misunderstanding or mistake in the King James Version is probably because the translators could not understand how the prince could be slain or dead, and still be alive as he obviously is in the scripture. The correct translation should be “And you, deadly wounded, wicked Prince of Israel"Thus a deadly wound that is healed. He will be killed, and come back to life, just as he is described in Revelations 13 and 17.Rev 13:3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. Rev 13:12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. Rev 17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yetis. The “beast that was, and is not, and yet is.”???? What does that mean? It means that he was alive, “that was” he's killed “is not” and comes back to life “and yet is.” Just as the deadly wounded prince of Israel is in Eze 21.'profane' Ezek. 21:25 Lexicon Results for chalal (Strong's 02491) Hebrew for 02491 Pronunciation Guide chalal châlâl {khaw-lawl'} TWOT Reference Root Word TWOT - 660a from 02490 Part of Speech n m, adj. Outline of Biblical Usage n m 1) slain, fatally wounded, pierced a) pierced, fatally wounded
slainadj. 2) (CLBL) profaned a) defiled, profaned (by divorce) Authorized Version (KJV) Translation Count — Total: 94 AV - slay 78 times, wounded 10 times, profane 3 times, kill 2 times, slain man 1 time; out of 94 timesFor those of you that think that this is just my opinion, and I have some how misunderstood the Hebrew language. Consider these translators take on the translation of the word profane. NASB 'And you, O slain, wicked one, the prince of Israel, whose day has come, in the time of the punishment of the end,' ASV And thou, O deadly wounded wicked one, the prince of Israel, whose day is come, in the time of the iniquity of the end, HNV You, deadly wounded wicked one, the prince of Yisra'el, whose day is come, in the time of the iniquity of the end, MKJV And you, O slain, wicked king of Israel, of whom has come his day in the time of iniquity of the end. YLT And thou, wounded, wicked one, Prince of Israel, whose day hath come, In the time of the iniquity of the end!YOUNG'S And thou, wounded, wicked one, Prince of Israel, whose day hath come, In the time of the iniquity of the end! I have found no where in the Bible that says that either kings Jehoiachin or Zedekiah ever received a deadly wound and lived. Zedekiah had his eyes put out (2Ki 25) but it says nothing about a life taking or deadly wound.Now lets take a look at the rest of those scriptures. Verse 25 “when iniquity shall have an end,” or when there is no more transgressions of the Laws of God. The reference of “iniquity shall have an end” is to me obviously speaking of when Jesus sets up his kingdom on earth at the end of days. No more iniquity or the transgression of God's laws will occure. And in verse 26 it refers to the same time period by stating “exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high.” When Jesus spoke of his coming Kingdom in Mathew 23:12 he said: “And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.” In verse 26 it says that God himself will take away the crown from this “profane, wicked prince of Israel,” and in verse 27 it says God will give the crown to him “whose right it is” There is only one man who’s right it is to wear the crown in Israel, and that is Jesus the Christ!Thus the scriptures in both the Old and New Testaments Identify the man of sin as a Jew. I do not like using the title of antichrist because according to the Bible all men who deny that Jesus is the Christ is an antichrist. 1Jn 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth theFather and the Son. 1Jn 2:23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: but he that acknowledgeth theSon hath the Father also. 2Jn 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come inthe flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. The spirit of antichrist is alive in many people today and that spirit is dominant in Judaism. Google come and here Talmud and see for yourself.Read the book of Acts and you will find that the vast majority of those John is writing about in those verses are Jews. Take a look at those that constantly persecute Paul throughout his mission. Take alook at his epistles or letters to the Church's. He is nearly always fighting against the Judaising of Jewish members (Circumcised?) in the church's. Now before someone screams anti-Semite! (add nausea) remember St John and St Paul were Jews. And I did not write the book of Acts or the New Testament gospels or letters. Jesus as well as Paul both made it clear that a Jew is not a Jew because he is born one, but because he lives by faith. The circumcision of the heart, not of the flesh is what qualifies a man to be called the chosen of God.I put the (add nausea) in that statement because anyone that dares to speak the truth about Jews andtheir destructive moral influence on Christian's and society in general through their TV networks and movies is automatically branded an anti-Semite by the Jewish owned media which makes me sick.1. Rupert Murdoch, [Jewish mother and Zionists], CEO and owner of FOX.2. Gerald Levin, [Jew], CEO Time Warner (AOL, CNN, Time Inc.) Largest media conglomerate today. 3. Robert Iger [Jew] CEO of ABC Disney4. Jeff Zucker [Jew] President of NBC and Universal pictures.5. Sherry Lansing (born Sherry Lee Heimann) [Jewess] CBS Television and CBS radio Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, Black Entertainment Television, Country Music Television. 6.Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein) [Jew] ViacomThis is a very partial list. The news papers and cable TV is also completely dominated by Jewish ownership and control.Is it antisemitic to state the facts? Go to google and find the websites of the major networks as well as the newspapers and see for yourselves. It is not a coincidence that an ethnic group comprising of only 2% of the population of America control virtually all the media. The media has vast power over the way you think. That is a fact whether you know or accept it or not.