One 2 question
Well-Known Member
This was once my focus and even a priority, to defend the bible as I knew it. I was born into the practice of studying it every day. I actually became obsessed with this book.Because people invent sin very creatively. It's human's defining characteristic.
The "Talmud" is a term to reference Jewish religious fiction. This is the bulk of what people wish to add to the Scriptures. It has stories, songs, and tales and all kinds of stuff...Jesus referenced the literature and the book of Jude exclusively quotes and references this stuff...because it was common literature.
The Book of Hebrews references many extra biblical literature as well but it references theological works and sermons of settled theologies written by past former great Rabbi that they all gave credence to. The commentary most noted for being familiar with extra biblical literature is Westcott and Horts commentary on the book of Hebrews. Then Eadie and Lightfoot (Eadie was Westcotts apprentice while Hort and Lughtfoot were financiers of their works).
But we don't use Judaism theological books today as scripture...nor corrupt and innacurate history books as scripture...or even accurate history books.
Scripture is different, has a different purpose, is not a history book. (Even if it contains history)
Nor is SCRIPTURE an entertainment book for entertainment value...although some of the music and poetry can be quite entertaining.
All of these "removed" books were never considered scriptures. They do have value but are NOT SCRIPTURE. And that's what the advocates of these books never ever address. They discuss conspiracy theories and make mountains where there never was one. The last book accepted was Jude and those who brought it were from a fairly remote village. When voting to accept it they abstained from voting because they believed they were biased and didn't want to influence the vote. Conspiracy theorists blow up this abstaining into all sorts of lies.
They love the book of Enoch written @ 150-100 BC. Because the book addresses all the myths and old wives tales surrounding Judaism that had come about by syncreticism with various other religions....especially Mazdaism/Zoarastrianism (The precursor to Gnosticism) that came from the Medo-Persian Empire with Cyrus. The book of Enoch in the very first chapter declares itself NOT to be scripture in the first paragraph in a backhanded fashion but people today don't know the difference so liars gain ground constantly by promoting it.
(They do not fear God when doing so....which means they have zero wisdom)
Handling scripture the way people do today, because it's so common, is a serious egregious error that is often overlooked.
Sure, I extend grace like God has granted me when dealing with misinterpretation but that doesn't mean that it might even be blasphemy of God's name. (Not good)
Just because some books like Revelation might be out of reach of perfect comprehension by no means is license to create theologies out of whole cloth as a result of bad hermeneutics.
Until my eyes were opened and God showed me that I had replaced my relationship with Him, with a relationship with the bible.
I spent so much time with B (bible) and when I wasn't with her, I was thinking of her. When I need comfort, I went to B to find it. When I needed answers, I went to B. Even to the point where objects I encountered in every day life reminded me of what B had said.
I was caused to repent of my relationship with the bible and to get back to making the Spirit of God my go to. He was to be my Comforter, my source of Truth, the One I talk to, listen to, praise and worship. Yes, God, Whom happens to be my Companion comforting me as He guides me into all truth. He is awesome. He is my God.