The baby murdering Left is FUMING. How many more will they murder? They are so Satanic minded that they don't even care if they destroy their own home, this great country America! Don't be surprised if all "Hell breaks loose" in America! Baby murderers will also murder Christians.
The Consequences of Roe VS Wade Being Overturned
- Thread starter Jack
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
LearningToLetGo
Well-Known Member
Keep in mind the words of Jesus from Matthew 5:43-48 to love and pray for your enemies.
The unborn babies that have been murdered, if they were all of the same generation, would comprise the entire generation!
USA Population: 332,814,331
Population Clock
Abortions since 1973: 63,459,781
U.S. Abortion Statistics By Year (1973-Current) - Christian Life Resources
That's about 19% of the current US population. Census.gov also has a chart of population by ages, so I was able to compute the following.
If all those abortions were done during all at the same time - all babies aborted until that count was reached - it would require about 15 years, aborting all births.
What would that look like? For 15 years, no one new entering school. You'd see a couple of years with no one at all in primary, middle, or secondary schools. 10 years or so with on one in college. 15 years of no infant clothing sales. Formula? No one buying it for 15 years. And so on.
Baby Boomers, GenX, Millennials, GenZ, Gen Missing . . .
Much love!
Except that they are not your enemies. They are the enemies of the unborn. They are evildoers who choose to murder infants. Just like Herod.
Why aren't these people being arrested for breaking many laws? Because the law enforcers are now the criminals -- particularly the FBI Gestapo.
Webers_Home
Well-Known Member
.
The US Supreme Court's decision didn't outlaw abortions. It simply revealed
that abortions are not a true Constitutional right nor have they ever been a
true Constitutional right. The 1972 Court overstepped its bounds by
associating abortions with the right to privacy when there is no right to
privacy in the US Constitution.
States now have the authority to define their own abortion laws; which is
where abortion controls were supposed to be centralized in the first place in
accord with the Tenth Amendment; which says:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to
the people.
_
The US Supreme Court's decision didn't outlaw abortions. It simply revealed
that abortions are not a true Constitutional right nor have they ever been a
true Constitutional right. The 1972 Court overstepped its bounds by
associating abortions with the right to privacy when there is no right to
privacy in the US Constitution.
States now have the authority to define their own abortion laws; which is
where abortion controls were supposed to be centralized in the first place in
accord with the Tenth Amendment; which says:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to
the people.
_
LearningToLetGo
Well-Known Member
They are not my enemies but they are evildoers? That's not how I see it. As I see it they are ensnared by the enemy, made to believe that death is life and life is death. They need our understanding and compassion, and we need the same.
JohnPaul
Soldier of Jehovah and Christ
Thanks for pointing this out. It is unfortunate that the Justices who voted to overturn Roe are being vilified by pro-choice advocates for doing their judicial job. The judicial role is not to declare whether legislation is wise or foolish, moral or immoral, but only to declare whether legislation is Constitutionally permissible. As Justice Potter Stewart noted in his dissent in Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965, “it is not the function of this Court to decide cases on the basis of community standards. We are here to decide cases ‘agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States.’ It is the essence of judicial duty to subordinate our own personal views, our own ideas of what legislation is wise and what is not.”
Bob Estey
Well-Known Member
Similar threads
