What is different from the old covenant and your so-called new old covenant arrangement in your supposed future millennium? Why do you need further sin offerings? Is the cross not enough for you?
Any difference is seen in Ezekiel's prophecy compared to the covenant and law of Moses written by Moses.
You can accuse the Lord of defaming His cross, not me.
Of course. I'm not a fanatic that refuses to agree with anything anyone else says.So, you are admitting my assertion was right.
You got something correct about what I teach, then good for you. It's rare, so I applaud it when you do.
I also acknowledge when you actually ask an honest question, that doesn't cover a silly accusation, such as "Isn't the cross enough for you?" Gee, you certainly got me there.
You remind me of professors, that have learned all the scholar-speak to decorate their dissertations, and yet personally have not grown beyond grade school psychology.
Hello! Where is this in the Book, the Bible, not your Left Behind novels.
All good law-abiding citizens interact with good rulers and laws. During the Lord's reign, the earth will be blessed with good laws, with righteous judgement and fair execution of those laws.
Those seeking to do good, will interreact well with the Lord and His ruling saints.
And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.
Simple.
I admit when you get my teaching right. I haven't yet seen anything of your teaching, that I agree with.So, you are admitting my assertion was right.
If I do, then I'll gladly say so, since I'm not afraid of agreeing with someone else, who on the whole disagrees with me.
The difference between you and me, is that I'm not a child that thinks this is all about gotcha games.
You can't be corrected because of pride, but I can be corrected with humility.
The answer is no. It's not my millennium. And certainly not in the Lord's on earth.Do the wicked overrun your millennium - yes or no? The answer is yes!
I've also rebuked your self-righteous judgment of all natural people, and your fanatic hatred and disdain for all unbelievers. Which includes professing Christians that don't agree with your large teachings, filled with pompous scholar-speak.
You are so fanatic in it, that you can't even conceive any people living neighborly and abiding by good laws to provide for their own, if they don't agree with everything you think and say.
Like the Pharisees of old, you no doubt need to ceremonially cleanse your spirit and flesh, when you come into contact with an 'unbeliever'.
You are avoiding what I wrote. If there are mortal saints that surrender their lives to Christ in some supposed future millennium, and if the earth does indeed flee away after Satan's little season as Revelation 20 states, then there must be another rapture and glorification in order to rescue them from the regeneration or replacement of this current earth.
You want to move on to another teaching about a millennial reign of Christ on earth, then first acknowledge there is one.
Then we can talk about possibility of natural people during His reign becoming born again saints.
Otherwise, I don't waste time arguing with someone about something else, when I see I am beginning to waste my time arguing about the subject at hand.
You're like many people that just love to argue for argument's sake. It's called intellectual stimulation and pride that edifies nothing.
And so, unless you come yup with a new point about your teaching, or you ask honest questions about mine, then we'll be winding down pretty soon.
Once I believe I've exhausted an argument with someone, then I move on. I don't do boring.