While I did not read every detail, it seems that you have identified the Pope as the Antichrist. This was the position of the Reformers also.
However, it is not the correct interpretation of who is the Antichrist. This Man of Sin, the Son of Perdition, and the Beast of Revelation 13 is also Daniel's "little horn" and "the king of fierce countenance" (as well as having other descriptive titles). This man must of necessity be a renegade Jew who can have access to the future temple in Jerusalem. He must be able to be able to claim that he is the true Messiah, and that Messiah must be a Jew. He may even claim to come of the line of David. And he will fulfil the desire of Orthodox Jews for their *true Messiah*, since they rejected the Lord Jesus Christ.
No doubt the church of Rome will play a significant role in the kingdom of the Antichrist, but no pope has every been -- or ever will be -- a miracle worker.
The "little horn" of the 4th kingdom came through the context of the 4th beast, which was Rome. That should tell you already that the "little horn" symbolizes a man that is Roman. It baffles me how so many people choose to reject the obvious truth. For what, to continue believing in fantasies to not have to accept the implications associated with the truth? So be it, the sons of perdition will continue believing lies and fantasies up until the very end, and then it will be made obvious that the true man of lawlessness did indeed come through Rome, and that they were deceived by him, and will mourn and wish they had understood the truth beforehand.