@GracePeace
Just saw that you have a thread on the New Eve.
Will transfer this to over there after dinner....
Just saw that you have a thread on the New Eve.
Will transfer this to over there after dinner....
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No, I reject the IC, bc it is founded upon the erroneous belief that Mary is the New Eve, just as I explained in the OP.I've considered the IC a lot and have come to believe that it most probably is true.
It seems logical to me that God would want The Son to be in a body that was pure.
Whether or not it remained pure, I have no opinion on.
Also, the assumption seems a bit far off to me.
Haven't thought much about the "new Eve" either.
So much other stuff to know about Christianity.
I DO believe she is the new ark of the covenant.
What do you think?
What was in the ark.....
Ten Commandments, inscribed on stone tablets.
Aaron's rod, which had blossomed and produced almonds.
Manna.
Mary carried the word of God...the 10 Commandments but written on our heart.
The rod symbolized priesthood. Jesus is our High Priest.
Jesus is the food from heaven that lasts forever and not for just one day.
Interesting.No, I reject the IC, bc it is founded upon the erroneous belief that Mary is the New Eve, just as I explained in the OP.
You're making claims and can't back them up. I don't care what you want.Go make a thread about it; I'll be waiting on MY thread to hear discussion on MY topic.
Stop speaking garbage, engage the topic.
Yes - and seeing that it was the Catholic Church they compiled the Books and declared the Canon of Scripture under the guidance of the Holy Spirit - you wouldn't even HAVE a Bible . . .Big Boy....
Let me assure you of this:
If it were not for the CC, which kept gnosticism, arianism, and other isms out of the church at the time,
we would not be here discussing biblical matters.
You're admittedly not even interested in engaging with the claims I backed up. Why are you asking for claims to be backed up that you're not even willing to engage with? You make no sense.You're making claims and can't back them up. I don't care what you want.
Soooo, you're against marital vows??This thread is for sharing Roman Catholic dogmas that are clearly debunked, which, in turn, debunk their claims of infallibility.
2. The Catholic Church teaches dogmatically (Canon 1191 §1) that it is perfectly acceptable to, in some cases, take vows; however, Jesus says taking vows is "of the evil one" (Mt 5), and James (Ja 5), echoing Jesus, commands, "take no vow at all, lest you fall under condemnation".
The great harlot did the same . Look at all the whoredomes JERSUALEM had come to commitYes - and seeing that it was the Catholic Church they compiled the Books and declared the Canon of Scripture under the guidance of the Holy Spirit - you wouldn't even HAVE a Bible . . .
Two reasons. 1) to see if you can back up your claim. This far the answer is "No". 2) to make sure people know this is a puppet show you put on.You're admittedly not even interested in engaging with the claims I backed up. Why are you asking for claims to be backed up that you're not even willing to engage with? You make no sense.
Let alone where it says, "Again you have heard that our ancestors were told: 'Do not swear falsely, but fulfill the vows you have made to the Lord'". (Matt 5:33)Yes - and seeing that it was the Catholic Church they compiled the Books and declared the Canon of Scripture under the guidance of the Holy Spirit - you wouldn't even HAVE a Bible . . .
Are marital vows vows? Yes? I'm against them.Soooo, you're against marital vows??
When He prohibited taking of vows, and James confirms it by saying "take no vow at all"?Please explain how Jesus taught against this.
How about you? Do you have the capability to show that anything you believe existed before the 1500s?The great harlot did the same . Look at all the whoredomes JERSUALEM had come to commit
YET their scribes were still faithfully recopying the torah . EVEN THOUGH they did not KNOW TORAH OR THE GOD
who inspired them lovely words .
Just cause folks can recopy truth , DONT MEAN THEY ARE OF or even KNOW the TRUTH .
Perhaps its far far better
WE JUST READ THEM LOVELY SCRIPS FOR OUR OWN SELVES
cause while i wish i could pull you outta the RCC
I SURE as heck cant tell ya TO GO TO THE PROTESTANT realm , HECKS its been overcome too by nasty delusions .
What we have here IS A FAILURE to communicate . NOW its BIBLE TIME my friend . BIBLE TIME
Time we learn for ourselves what so many ONLY TWIST Unto their own destruction .
GOD cannot lie , but i promise us all MAN sure can and many darn sure have been doing that , lying to this people .
A lovely bible . Torah and the letters of the apostels , the gospels of the fourHow about you? Do you have the capability to show that anything you believe existed before the 1500s?
I went ahead and put him on ignore. He had nothing to say, no defense for the assault on his Church's nonsense tradition. LOLA lovely bible . Torah and the letters of the apostels , the gospels of the four
acts , even in the scroll of revelation .
SURELY now < YE KNOW THAT TRUTH Existed before the fifteen hundreds .
It aint my fault people blindly follow leaders who twist scrips unto their own destruction .
OPEN a bible , WOOP there it is , THAT EXISTED long before any fifteen hundred did .
But man have many often twisted it , omitted much of it
Spoke in latin and accused those who even tried to RECOPY IT in their langauge .
OH I KNOW ALL ABOUT men whose love is for POWER and CONTROL . heck christendom is now FULL Of them
and they lead this people right to the day of their perdtion and destruction .
YOO HOO , we are BEING DECIEVED BIG TIME by both the RCC and That protestant realm .
YOO hoo , LETS bible up and learn for ourselves . that is what i been trying to get people to do for years .
BUt so many just want to remain in the JW
or mormon , or sda , or whatever it is . People just blindly follow men .
Trench down for the long haul . cause this delusion will only get worse my friend .Are marital vows vows? Yes? I'm against them.
When He prohibited taking of vows, and James confirms it by saying "take no vow at all"?
How about you? Do you have the capability to show that anything you believe existed before the 1500s?
Spot on right my friend .What actual, Christians believe goes back to God's Word which was way before the 1500s![]()
Onward in the glorious LORD the sheep shall continue . TO the LORD be all the gloryI went ahead and put him on ignore. He had nothing to say, no defense for the assault on his Church's nonsense tradition. LOL
Oh its getting worse than that my friend . Today we got eve as the new adam . proconfusedgender eveNo, I reject the IC, bc it is founded upon the erroneous belief that Mary is the New Eve, just as I explained in the OP.
yes what actual christains believe and WHO actual christains followWhat actual, Christians believe goes back to God's Word which was way before the 1500s![]()