Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Joh 3:29 He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom's voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.There remains another unanswered question. What did John hear the bridegroom say?
Oh Johann, someone else spoke while Jesus was being baptized.. what was said?Joh 3:29 He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom's voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.
Joh 3:30 He must increase, but I must decrease.
The bridegroom (numphios). Predicate nominative without article. Both numphē (bride) and numphios are old and common words. Jesus will use this metaphor of himself as the Bridegroom (Mar_2:19) and Paul develops it (2Co_11:2; Eph_5:23-32) and so in Revelation (Rev_19:7; Rev_21:2). John is only like the paranymph (paranumphios) or “the friend of the bridegroom.” His office is to bring groom and bride together. So he stands expectant (hestēkōs, second perfect active participle of histēmi) and listens (akouōn, present active participle of akouō) with joy (rejoiceth greatly, charāi chairei, “with joy rejoices”) to the music of the bridegroom’s voice.
This does not remain unanswered---
John definitely puts an end to any sense of competition between himself and Jesus by placing himself in the position of the bridegroom's friend or "best man". Once the bridegroom and bride have been brought together, the "best man's" work is completed and he fades off the scene. How foolish it would be for the best man to attempt to upstage the bridegroom, even to the point of trying to take his place! That would be absurd! And that is John's point to his disciples. John hearing of the voice of Jesus gave him joy, joy filled to the brim. While he was still in his mother Elizabeth's womb, John had leaped for joy when he heard the sound of Jesus' mother Mary (Lk 1:41, 44), which reflects the fact that even before birth John was filled with the Holy Spirit (Lk 1:15) (So much for the argument that infants in utero are not human beings, even capable of emotional expression!) John the Baptist was content to be the voice announcing the Bridegroom Jesus to be the Word (Jn 1:23). In the same way he was also content to be be the witness pointing others to Jesus, Who was the Light
Luk 3:20 added this to them all, that he locked up John in prison.@Johann im attempting to give you an image of the first begotten man of the Father
As John states in his gospel. The beginning was when the light entered into the world, this all began with the Christ. There was no light/ truth prior too Jesus.
Do you believe this?
Now this is much better--Yes, I would concur--depends how you view Jesus as the "first begotten man"--was Christ a created being?@Johann im attempting to give you an image of the first begotten man of the Father
As John states in his gospel. The beginning was when the light entered into the world, this all began with the Christ. There was no light/ truth prior too Jesus.
Do you believe this?
Here a bone to chew on--why do you think we have two genealogies?
That of Matthew and Luke? Think Jewish and read with a Jewish mindset.
Give me your interpretation, I can read, even if it is lengthyThere is a very important reason we have two, but it's unlikely that you understand why. Two genealogies -- and two houses. Two branches of one tree.
But I shall disengage since it is painfully obvious you are casting doubts on my Bible as it stands written, Perfect Tense--and don't know how to rebut or refute the rabbis WITH Scriptures
Yes, I'm moving on--you are getting too personal and you don't know me.I'm actually shining a light on the scriptures Johann. You just don't like it.
I show you things specific and explicit and you equivocate and say it doesn't mean what it says. All I'm doing is casting shadows on your beliefs. You do realize that you've adopted certain beliefs about things that don't actually align with those scriptures you profess to believe in. I guarantee you do not agree with scriptures, and I've already proven as much here as it relates to the father of Jesus that scripture identifies explicitly as Joseph. It's not me you are disagreeing with.
I do understand how threatening "ideas" can be to someone who is close-minded and hard-hearted. You'd much prefer to hunker down in the comfort of some holy huddle where such things as 'questions and ideas' are not permitted to be voiced. Try a church, a synagogue or maybe a college campus.... but an online forum is engineered specifically to facilitate discussion of subjects like this. You shouldn't feel frightened. Neither should you continue on like a forum bully-- thinking that you need to whack-a-mole every time something pops up that you don't agree with. Just move on. Be true to your word if you are capable, and disengage.
Isaiah 53--who is the suffering servant?
YisraEL or Yeshua?
I'd like to hear your answer on this.
Shalom
Yeah. It becomes a complete work of fiction.Yes, I'm moving on--you are getting too personal and you don't know me.
Yeah. It becomes a complete work of fiction.
Good morning, brother!
Much love!
Good morning brother.Yeah. It becomes a complete work of fiction.
Good morning, brother!
Much love!
I realized that as I wrote it . . . Good evening!Good morning brother.
5.29 PM here.
J.
Your fiction about Johann.I don’t think it’s a work of fiction at all.
Send me makes me consider 1 Kings 22:19-23:Who is a servant of God? --- the one who hears His voice in spirit and in spirit and truth answers His call and says- 'Here am I send me.'
And that one will surely suffer the same fate as all those who have similarly been sent in service to the King.
I've sometimes wondered if that's why some members get so personal like that, to get rid of inconvenient posters. Bully them off the thread. That's how it seems a lot of the time!Yes, I'm moving on--you are getting too personal and you don't know me.