- Jan 26, 2017
- 10,580
- 8,428
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
This is a general question. I was going to post it under non- Christian, general questions but was alerted ‘You have insufficient privileges to post threads here’
I’m working on a story about an atheist “pagan”physiologist being told, narrated, the story of the daughter of a religious-extremist Reverend after his demise. The story is told by one of the victims of the daughter of the Reverend. A young girl telling of what happened. The Reverends only daughter is reclusive in her old age and because of the indoctrination of her fathers’ strict views on punishment—in old age the woman doesn’t take well to trespassers. As a group of teens soon discover; intruding in the woman’s world will cost them an up-close encounter with the Religious- extremists’ indoctrinated daughter. To outsiders the daughter of the Reverend with her pack of dogs is extreme. To the Reverends daughter; her life is right and just; and all outsiders are wrong and worthy of judgment.
Why post here though? Because the story has caused this question for me. Regarding the plea of insanity and not able to stand trial for judgement. This is under man’s system…of what is fair, yea? I get it is a hard question in the sense that if I ever knew what is done by people behind closed doors, I would say a plea of insanity is bogus. A way of not suffering the consequences of your actions. How they deserve to pay for what they have done. Even if it is death. But that is not what I’m asking about.
I asking about the trial and judgment of God. For example if someone is blind, so messed up in the mind, of an unstable mind, that they can’t hear or see or understand a thing. why would man consider a plea of insanity for the unstable mind —-whether someone of an unstable mind is able to stand trial— but God in Judgement and Trial doesn’t consider the unstable mind as if it (the unstable)is able to stand trial?
Just asking for perspective… not to start a debate, but only put it here under debate because I couldn’t put it outside under general questions… and just how “unstable” is an “unstable mind”? How does man determine stable enough? How does God determine “stable” to stand trial and judgment? I get to claim insanity can be a means to an end of escape. But God who sees the heart and knows the mind of the Spirit … does He judge between the unstable mind and the stable mind …and what about the unstable not by mens term but by God’s seeing? What falls under “unstable” yet will stand trial?
I’m working on a story about an atheist “pagan”physiologist being told, narrated, the story of the daughter of a religious-extremist Reverend after his demise. The story is told by one of the victims of the daughter of the Reverend. A young girl telling of what happened. The Reverends only daughter is reclusive in her old age and because of the indoctrination of her fathers’ strict views on punishment—in old age the woman doesn’t take well to trespassers. As a group of teens soon discover; intruding in the woman’s world will cost them an up-close encounter with the Religious- extremists’ indoctrinated daughter. To outsiders the daughter of the Reverend with her pack of dogs is extreme. To the Reverends daughter; her life is right and just; and all outsiders are wrong and worthy of judgment.
Why post here though? Because the story has caused this question for me. Regarding the plea of insanity and not able to stand trial for judgement. This is under man’s system…of what is fair, yea? I get it is a hard question in the sense that if I ever knew what is done by people behind closed doors, I would say a plea of insanity is bogus. A way of not suffering the consequences of your actions. How they deserve to pay for what they have done. Even if it is death. But that is not what I’m asking about.
I asking about the trial and judgment of God. For example if someone is blind, so messed up in the mind, of an unstable mind, that they can’t hear or see or understand a thing. why would man consider a plea of insanity for the unstable mind —-whether someone of an unstable mind is able to stand trial— but God in Judgement and Trial doesn’t consider the unstable mind as if it (the unstable)is able to stand trial?
Just asking for perspective… not to start a debate, but only put it here under debate because I couldn’t put it outside under general questions… and just how “unstable” is an “unstable mind”? How does man determine stable enough? How does God determine “stable” to stand trial and judgment? I get to claim insanity can be a means to an end of escape. But God who sees the heart and knows the mind of the Spirit … does He judge between the unstable mind and the stable mind …and what about the unstable not by mens term but by God’s seeing? What falls under “unstable” yet will stand trial?
Last edited: