There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

[The Learner]

Master Index of Quotes of Quotes used to trash the Trinity in the Watchtower's, "Should you believe the Trinity?"

Statistical Analysis of Quotes used to trash the Trinity in "Should you believe the Trinity?"

In Defense of the Trinity

If Jehovah's Witnesses get rid of the Trinity, they get rid of Christ’s divinity as well. Here is how to refute their most common errors.

www.catholic.com

Quotes on the Trinity from the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society

Various quotes from the JW's organization on the Trinity which the Watchtower organization considers to be pagan in origin, apostate, etc

carm.org

Should You Believe in the Trinity?

Serving Christ in hope of setting men free from religious bondage with the truth of God’s Word.

www.towertotruth.net

Pre-Nicene Council Trinity Quotes

I've been teaching my church about the Trinity in Sunday Seminary (aka Sunday School) for the past 3 weeks, and this week I want to end by tracing the doctrine through church history. First I am looking for some quotes about the Trinity that precede the Coucil of Nicene in 325 A.D. I...

www.puritanboard.com

The Trinity: 29 Bible Verses & Quotes about the Triune God

We don't have all the answers about the Trinity, Scripture reveals to us truths about. Here are 29 verses and quotes about the Trinity.

www.logos.com

Trinity Quotes from Christian History

Powerful or fascinating Trinity quotes from throughout Christian history.

www.christian-history.org

 

[Keiw]

Nothing like calling the Kettle Back. poor misleading translations is exactly what the NWT does.

The nwt is the best.

 

[Keiw]

And, Bowman lists the Scriptures including what Jesus said.

Example:

Matthew 28:19​

​

Easy-to-Read Version​

​

​

19 So go and make followers of all people in the world. Baptize them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.

KJ21
Go ye therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost,
ASV
Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit:
CSB
Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
CEB
Therefore, go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
EHV
Therefore go and gather disciples from all nations by baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
ESV
Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
ESVUK
Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
EXB
So go and make ·followers [disciples] of all ·people in the world [the nations]. Baptize them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.
GNV
Go therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and the Son, and the holy Ghost,
GW
So wherever you go, make disciples of all nations: Baptize them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.
GNT
Go, then, to all peoples everywhere and make them my disciples: baptize them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit,
HCSB
Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
MOUNCE
Therefore go and make disciples of all · nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
NOG
So wherever you go, make disciples of all nations: Baptize them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.
NABRE
Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit,
NASB
Go, therefore, and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit,
NASB1995
Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit,
NCB
Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
NCV
So go and make followers of all people in the world. Baptize them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.
NET
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit,
NIRV
So you must go and make disciples of all nations. Baptize them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
NIV
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
NIVUK
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit
NRSVACE
Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
NRSVCE
Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
NRSVUE
Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit
NTFE
So you must go and make all the nations into disciples. Baptize them in the name of the father, and of the son, and of the holy spirit.
OJB
Go, therefore, make talmidim for Rebbe, Melech HaMoshiach of all the nations, giving them a tevilah in a mikveh mayim in Hashem, in the Name of
YLT
having gone, then, disciple all the nations, (baptizing them -- to the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit,

NWTGo, therefore, and make disciples of people of all the nations,o baptizing themp in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit,

Just like stop in the name of the law. All servants of the law do it in the name of the law. Same with Gods servants, they do it all in his name, they represent him.
Yes Go and make followers--like this-Luke 10, Acts 20:20

 

[The Learner]

The nwt is the best.

Maybe in the galaxy Satania! lol

 

[The Learner]

Just like stop in the name of the law. All servants of the law do it in the name of the law. Same with Gods servants, they do it all in his name, they represent him.
Yes Go and make followers--like this-Luke 10, Acts 20:20

Point was Baptised in all three titiles of the Trinity.

 

[Keiw]

Maybe in the galaxy Satania! lol

The world laughed at Noah to.

 

[Keiw]

Point was Baptised in all three titiles of the Trinity.

If God is a trinity then Jesus lied-John 17:3 and Paul lied-1Cor 8:6--But anyone who can add 1+1 and get 2 knows they didn't lie. The trinity teaching is a lie, and facts back that up.

 

[Rich R]

There is, unfortunately, a rather common misconception among professing Christians, of a supposed spiritual gift called “the gift of tongues” in the church of the Lord Jesus Christ. When the truth of the Word of God is presented unto such people, many of them will shut their ears, cast the truth behind their backs, and judge themselves unworthy of everlasting life. Even as the Lord Jesus testified of the stiffnecked Jews in the days of his flesh saying that:

"...This people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them."
— (Matthew 13:15).

The supposed “gift of tongues” only serves one purpose; and that is to cause confusion. Wherefore it is written in the scriptures:

"If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God..."
— (1 Peter 4:11).

And again:

"Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding."
— (Proverbs 3:5).

Jesus Christ said:

"...If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
— (John 8:31-32).

It is also written:

"To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them."
— (Isaiah 8:20).

Having said this, the scriptures testify that:

"...When the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilæans? And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born? Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judæa, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God."
— (Acts 2:1-11).

This is what the Word of God says; that they began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. When this was noised abroad, the Jews who were out of many nations under heaven, heard these tongues and they understood them.

This is that which will happen when men and women receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. They will:

"...Speak with tongues, and magnify God..."
— (Acts 10:46).

And this is a sign which will follow those that believe! For it is written that Jesus Christ said:

"...These signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues..."
— (Mark 16:17).

And Peter said that the promise is:

"...Unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call."
— (Acts 2:39).

Friends, this is the gift of the Holy Ghost. Christ in you, the hope of glory. All christians have this gift. It is written:

"...Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his."
— (Romans 8:9).

Now, concerning spiritual gifts:

"...There are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord. And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all. But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; to another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; to another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues: but all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will."
— (1 Corinthians 12:4-11).

We can see from the scripture that one of these spiritual gifts is a gift called divers kinds of tongues. It is followed with another spiritual gift called interpretation of tongues. Wherefore, there is no spiritual gift which causes Christians to speak with tongues called "the gift of tongues". But, there is a gift called divers kinds of tongues which causes some Christians to speak with diversities of tongues. Which means many different kinds of tongues, not just one. Though every Christian has the gift of the Holy Ghost (for if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his), not every Christian has the gift of divers kinds of tongues; or the gift of interpretation of tongues. This is why it is written in the scripture that God:

"...Hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues. Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Are all workers of miracles? Have all the gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret?"
— (1 Corinthians 12:28-30).

But alas, some people subconsciously remove the words “divers kinds” which changes the definition of the entire gift; this is a dangerous thing indeed. We should be very careful with how we speak the Word of God. For it is written:

"Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you."
— (Deuteronomy 4:2).

Good post! I have one observation that may be relevant:

1 Cor 12:7-10,

7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.​

​

8 For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit;​

​

9 To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit;​

​

10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another [divers] kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:​

Given these verses, wouldn't it be more according to God's word to call tongues (and the other 8) a manifestation rather than a gift? Might it not be that holy spirit is the gift and there are 9 different ways to bring that otherwise invisible spiritual gift into manifestation in the physical realm so that others can be blessed in one of 9 different ways?

 

[The Learner]

The world laughed at Noah to.

So What

Noah was not teaching flasehood, you are. Comparing yourself with Noah is just funny.

 

[The Learner]

If God is a trinity then Jesus lied-John 17:3 and Paul lied-1Cor 8:6--But anyone who can add 1+1 and get 2 knows they didn't lie. The trinity teaching is a lie, and facts back that up.

Poor Math, it is really 1^3

I posted a ton of true facts that proves the Trinity. In fact, you are blinded by your invincible ignorance.

Defined: invincible ignorance fallacy: also known as argument by pigheadedness, is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given.

 

[The Learner]

Other Fallacies by those in Cults like the watchtower.

Website on fallacies with examples Partial List of Fallacies and another is here Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies

Accent: ambiguity arising from special stress of words in a sentence, misquoting, taking out of context, emphasizing or shifting.

e.g., I didn't steal the book.

Accident: application of a generalization to a case that it is not intended to cover. Also known as Sweeping Generalization.

e.g., Taking what is not yours is wrong.

Ad Hominem: See Argumentum ad hominem. Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

e.g., A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong

Affirming the Consequent (formal fallacy): argument of the form:

• If p then q​
• q​
• therefore p​
  • If my dog barks then there is a intruder​
  • there is an intruder​
  • therefore my dog is barking​

All-or-Nothing fallacy; see black-white fallacy.

Ambiguity, fallacies of: fallacies depending on shifts in sense within an argument; includes accent, amphiboly, and equivocation. Your logical fallacy is ambiguity

Amphiboly: Ambiguity of grammatical or syntactical construction.

Ambiguity – the quality of being open to more than one interpretation; inexactness. using a double meaning or ambiguity of language to mislead or misrepresent the truth. Your logical fallacy is ambiguity

Amphiboly- An amphiboly occurs when the construction of a sentence allows it to have two different meanings.

i. semantical- Claims suffer from semantic ambiguity when they contain a word (or words) with multiple meanings “"We saw her duck”

ii. syntactical-“There was nothing in the safe” Eric Trump 8-10-22

“The chicken is ready to eat”.

Argumentum (Argument appealing to emotions) Your logical fallacy is appeal to emotion

ad bacullum: See Force, appeal to.

ad metum; (fear) scare tactic, see consequences

ad consequentiam: see~conseguences, appeal to.

e.g., It can't be true that Mr X is guilty of embezzlement because if it was he would not be the fine family man and good person we all know him to be.

ad hominem: argument attacking the arguer rather than the arguments; includes the following special cases.

 

[The Learner]

1. Ad hominem abusive: argument that an opponent's view is incorrect because of some personal defect of the opponent. Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

2. Ad hominem circumstantial: attack on a claim on the ground that the opponent is prejudiced in the question because of his special circumstances.

3. Tu quoque: defense of a claim on the basis that your opponent has himself made the claim or acted in accord with it or could not do any better. Your logical fallacy is tu quoque

4. Psychological Attack: critique of argument based upon critique of motives of arguer (psychoanalyzing)

ad ignorantium: see Ignorance appeal to.

ad misericordiam: see `Pity, appeal to.

ad populum: see "Gallery, appeal to the: also ~appeal to the people the mob( bandwagon)

ad captandum Vulgus: appeal to popular prejudices

ad naturum: appeal to nature, because something is 'natural' it is therefore valid, justified, inevitable, good or ideal. Your logical fallacy is appeal to nature

ad superbiam: appeal to pride

ad verecundiam: see Authority, appeal to

e.g., Climate change must be false because my councilman said so.

ad personal incredulity: appeal to complexity, because something is difficult to understand, or are unaware of how it works, it's probably not true. Your logical fallacy is personal incredulity

ad origin: genetic to judge something as either good or bad on the basis of where it comes from, or from whom it came Your logical fallacy is genetic

anecdotal: to use a personal experience or an isolated example instead of a sound argument or compelling evidence Your logical fallacy is anecdotal

Assumption of an irreversible order: confusing correlation with a cause. e.g., action award which must go first?

Authority, appeal to: argument from the fact that a purported authority supports a claim to the truth of the claim. Your logical fallacy is appeal to authority

Bandwagon appeal: argument that a view X is correct because everybody thinks so or that doing X is right because everybody does' it ( sometimes included under appeal to the gallery). Your logical fallacy is bandwagon

Beard, the; argument from difficulty in making a distinction precise in all cases to the impossibility of applying the distinction in any case. Your logical fallacy is slippery slope

Begging the Question: argument that assumes what is to be proved; using a premise whose acceptability presupposes the acceptability of the conclusion; circularity in an argument that is hidden by verbiage. Your logical fallacy is begging the question

Big Lie, fallacy of the : argument from a statement's having been repeatedly asserted to the conclusion that there must be some truth in the statement, or from a statement that at first appears so obviously false yet the arguer not irrational to the conclusion that there must be some truth to the statement. e.g., Nazi Propaganda re Jewish People, 2020 Presidential election in USA

Black and White fallacy: argument that assumes that alternatives are exhaustive when they are not. Your logical fallacy is black or white

 

[The Learner]

Burden of Proof: The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever or the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove. Your logical fallacy is burden of proof

Circular Argument: (special cases of begging the question):

argument of the pattern: A because of B of C because of ....because of A.

Complex Question: use of a question that imposes a presupposition onto any answer. Your logical fallacy is loaded question

Composition: argument based on the assumption that what is true of the part must be true of the whole. Your logical fallacy is composition or division

Confusing Necessary with Sufficient Conditions

Consequences: argument based on the assumption that a view should be accepted (or rejected) because it will lead to good (or bad) consequences.

Continuum, Fallacy of: See Beard, fallacy of the.

Converse Accident: attempt to refute an unqualified generalization by means of exceptional cases.

also known as Hasty Generalization based upon too few and exceptional cases.

Denying the Antecedent (formal fallacy): argument of the form if

• p then q. ​
• not p​
• ------------------------------​
• not q.
  e.g.,​
  • If you have a ticket then you'll get in​
  • You don't have a ticket​
  • -------------------------------​
  • therefore you will not get in​

Dicto Siinpliciter ( a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid): See accident.

Diversionary Tactics: attacking or supporting a view by shifting the point in question to a different but psychologically associated one (see Irrelevant conclusion),. attempt to evade the main question by attacking minor points in an opponent's arguments or by restoring to ridicule or irrelevant humor.

 

[The Learner]

Division: argument based on the assumption that what is true of the whole must be true of the parts. Your logical fallacy is composition or division

Doubtable Statement: To accept statements at face value which should be doubted given background information.

Equivocation: use' of a term in more than one sense; a fallacy of equivocation results when the shift in sense affects the relationship between the premises and the conclusion. Ambiguity of semantical construction.

Exaggeration or Absurd Extension: see Strawman(Strawperson) fallacy.

False Alternative~: assuming that alternatives are contradictories when they are only contraries. (see Black-White fallacy).

False Analogy: an argument from similarities in which the similarities either do not actually hold or are not relevant to the conclusion in question. overlooking important dissimilarities.

False Cause: inference that A causes B on the basis of inadequate evidence. Also known as post hoc, assuming the cause, & questionable cause Your logical fallacy is false cause

False Dilemma: special case of false alternatives in which the disjunctive premise of the dilemma is false. non-exhaustive alternatives.

Force, Appeal to: attempt to persuade by threats or force.

Four Terms Fallacy: equivocation with regard to one of the terms in a syllogism;

Gallery, appeal to the: argument appealing to popular prejudices.

Gambler's fallacy (Monte Carlo Fallacy); argument that an event that has occurred less frequently than expected in the recent past is more probable in the near future, or argument that proceeds based upon the mistaken assumption that events which are independent become dependent. Your logical fallacy is the gambler's fallacy

Genetic fallacy: argument in which a claim is accepted or rejected on the basis of its source; argument that projects characteristics of origins onto things developing from those origins.

Generalization: generalizing from insufficient or unrepresentative cases. Also known as converse accident

Hypothesis Contrary to Fact: argument of the patterns if P was in fact related to Q. then if P had not occurred, Q could not have occurred.

If event X did happen, then event Y would have happened (based only on speculation).

If you took that course on CD player repair right out of high school, you would be doing well and gainfully employed right now.

Ignorance, Appeal to: argument from the lack of a proof that P is false to the conclusion that P must be true or from a lack of proof that P is true to the conclusion that P must be false.

Ignora: See Irrelevant conclusion. AKA - "Red Herring"

Ignoratio Elenchi: (Irrelevant Conclusion); see also Straw Man; Red Herring; Non Sequitur-- any incorrect argument which reaches an evidentially irrelevant conclusion.​

 

[The Learner]

Impromptu Definition: See Persuasive definition.

Inconsistent Assumptions: use of premises that in conjunction form a contradiction; use of a self-defeating principle that is as damaging to one's own view as to one's opponent.

invincible ignorance fallacy: also known as argument by pigheadedness, is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given.

Irrelevant Conclusion: misdirect argument; use of premises that provide support for one conclusion to provide support for a different but psychologically associated conclusion. AKA - Ignoratio Elenchi, "Red Herring"

Jumping to a conclusion: See Hasty Generalization, Converse Accident.

Loaded Question: see complex question: Your logical fallacy is loaded question

Logic Chopping: Irrelevant overprecision on a point of logic. (see Diversionary tactics)

middle ground: arguer claims that a compromise, or middle point, between two extremes must be the truth Your logical fallacy is middle ground

Misuse of contradictory Alternatives: assuming that no two alternatives are exhaustive, not even contradictory ones.

Mob, Appeal to the: See Gallery, appeal to the.

Name Calling: attempt to discredit persons holding a view by using abusive language. For example, *Are you going to listen to that effect bleeding heart liberal?"

Negative Proof, fallacy of: special case of ignorance, appeal to.

Non Sequitur (it does not follow): general term for arguments in which the premises, even if true, give no adequate evidence for the conclusion.

Persuasive Definition: Attempt to prejudice the case for or against a view by appealing to a biased definition of one of the basic concepts involved.

Petito Principii: see begging the question.

Pity, Appeal to: argument that a conclusion should be accepted because its acceptance would relieve someone's misery.

Poisoning the Well: attempt: to discredit an opponent's' source of evidence (See Ad hominem)

 

[The Learner]

Post Hoc (post hoc ergo propter hoc): after this on account of this. See False cause.

Presumptive Proof; see Ignorance, appeal to.

Provincialism: to accept or reject a statement or argument because one identifies with a particular group.

Question Begging Epithet: loaded phrase such as "stodgy conservative "or "bleeding heart" liberal" (see Name calling)

Secundum Quid: See accident

Slanting: Argument based on a biased selection of the available evidence; suppression of evidence that is favorable (or unfavorable) to a view).

Slippery Slope: see Beard, fallacy of the Your logical fallacy is slippery slope

Slogans, appeal to: appeal to catchy phrases in place of giving reasons.

Special Pleading: appeal to some assumption in attacking an opponents view and then ignoring the consequences that assumption might have for your own view (special case of inconsistency). Your logical fallacy is special pleading

Statistical Fallacies

A. Small Sample: Hasty Generalization

B. Data of Different Quality

C. Biased Data: Selective Sample

D. Unknowable Statistics

E. Accidental Correlation the texas sharpshooter: You cherry-picked a data cluster to suit your argument, or found a pattern to fit a presumption. Your logical fallacy is the texas sharpshooter​

 

[The Learner]

Strawperson fallacy: arguing against a view by attacking an exaggerated or absurd extension of the view. "A special case of irrelevant conclusion. Attacking a misstated form of an argument. a deliberately weakened form. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman Tuo quoque: See Ad hominem. Two Wrong Make A Right: Answering a charge of wrongdoing, not by showing that no wring was done, but rather by claiming others do it too. Unqualified Generalization: See Accident. Sweeping Generalization: See Accident.​ Fallacies​ A fallacy is a kind of error in reasoning. The list of fallacies found here Partial List of Fallacies contains 231 names of the most common fallacies, and it provides brief explanations and examples of each of them. Fallacious arguments should not be persuasive, but they too often are. Fallacies may be created unintentionally, or they may be created intentionally in order to deceive other people. -Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy ​ MASTER LIST 146 Master List of Logical Fallacies​ Logical fallacies 3 minutes Critical Thinking and Decision-Making: Logical Fallacies​ Analyzing Trump: 15 Logical Fallacies in 3 Minutes LOGIC: The logical fallacies of Donald Trump - ​

The list of fallacies found here Partial List of Fallacies contains 231 names of the most common fallacies,​ Abusive Ad Hominem​ Accent​ Accentus​ Accident​ Ad Baculum​ Ad Consequentiam​ Ad Crumenum​ Ad Hoc Rescue​ Ad Hominem​ Ad Hominem, Circumstantial​ Ad Ignorantiam​ Ad Misericordiam​ Ad Novitatem​

 

[The Learner]

• Ad Numerum​
• Ad Populum​
• Ad Verecundiam​
• Affirming the Consequent​
• Against the Person​
• All-or-Nothing​
• Ambiguity​
• Amphiboly​
• Anecdotal Evidence​
• Anthropomorphism​
• Appeal to Authority​
• Appeal to Consequence​
• Appeal to Emotions​
• Appeal to Force​
• Appeal to Ignorance​
• Appeal to Money​
• Appeal to Past Practice​
• Appeal to Pity​
• Appeal to Snobbery​
• Appeal to the Gallery​
• Appeal to the Masses​
• Appeal to the Mob​
• Appeal to the People​
• Appeal to the Stick​
• Appeal to Traditional Wisdom​
• Appeal to Vanity​
• Appeal to Unqualified Authority​
• Argument from Ignorance​
• Argument from Outrage​
• Argument from Popularity​
• Argumentum Ad ….​
• Argumentum Consensus Gentium​
• Availability Heuristic​
• Avoiding the Issue​
• Avoiding the Question​

 

[The Learner]

• Bad Seed​
• Bald Man​
• Bandwagon​
• Begging the Question​
• Beside the Point​
• Biased Generalizing​
• Biased Sample​
• Biased Statistics​
• Bifurcation​
• Black-or-White​
• Caricaturization​
• Changing the Question​
• Cherry-Picking the Evidence​
• Circular Reasoning​
• Circumstantial Ad Hominem​
• Clouding the Issue​
• Common Belief​
• Common Cause.​
• Common Practice​
• Complex Question​
• Composition​
• Confirmation Bias​
• Confusing an Explanation with an Excuse​
• Conjunction​
• Consensus Gentium​
• Consequence​
• Contextomy​
• Converse Accident​
• Cover-up​

 

[The Learner]

• Cum Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc​
• Curve Fitting​
• Definist​
• Denying the Antecedent​
• Digression​
• Disregarding Known Science​
• Distraction​
• Division​
• Domino​
• Double Standard​
• Either/Or​
• Equivocation​
• Etymological​
• Every and All​
• Exaggeration​
• Excluded Middle​
• False Analogy​
• False Balance​
• False Cause​
• False Dichotomy​
• False Dilemma​
• False Equivalence​
• Far-Fetched Hypothesis​
• Faulty Comparison​
• Faulty Generalization​
• Faulty Motives​
• Formal​
• Four Terms​
• Gambler’s​
• Genetic​
• Group Think​
• Guilt by Association​
• Hasty Conclusion​
• Hasty Generalization​
• Heap​
• Hedging​
• Hooded Man​
• Hyperbolic Discounting​
• Hypostatization​
• Ideology-Driven Argumentation​
• Ignoratio Elenchi​
• Ignoring a Common Cause​
• Ignoring Inconvenient Data​
• Improper Analogy​
• Incomplete Evidence​
• Inconsistency​
• Inductive Conversion​
• Insufficient Statistics​