Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I read the scientific literature, immunologists, biochemists, physicians, et al. People who actually know what they are talking about. Or you can take your advice from other sources...
The Holy Spirit said to me that the doctors on TV are of Satan pool of demons. That was Fauci, Birx,, and others. The US Surgeon General disputed their words. God does not lie. Jeremiah 17:5 -
You seem to believe that. But it's not very convincing, given the facts. Lots of people believe that God has told them various things. Can you show us you're different?
I don't need to. I tell people what Lord tells me. Believe it or don't. It is in the visions and dreams forum. I saw the vision and heard the Holy Spirit speaking.
The first thing pseudo-science people tell you is "everyone else is lying." Show us that the people leading you on, are different. And no, I'm not buying the story that all those physicians and health departments are lying.
Show us that. Let's look at those cases.
www.ama-assn.org
Show us your data on that.
www.humanrightsresearch.org
That's a common misconception. The ancients knew that the Earth was a sphere. A few hundred years before Christ was born, Eratosthenes actually came up with a very accurate measure of its circumference.
www.thearchaeologist.org
When 97.8% of physicians agree on a medical issue, it would take a very strong resistance to reality to disagree with them.
No. I just think it's foolish to believe 2.2% of doctors rather than the 97.8% of them.
I used to teach science at the college level. You're wrong about that, too. See above. That's how I knew your assumptions were wrong.
Then you'd probably want to know that Popper concluded that Evolutionary theory was scientific. Do you know why?
Maybe one of us is. See examples above.
If you think so, you don't have any understanding of Karl Popper at all.
www.nature.com
If you consider medical journals to be corrupt sources, you've lost contact with reality. At the end, all you seem to have is "all the doctors are lying."
But you can't show that it happened? Pretty sure why.
You're wrong about the second part. For example a person in the armed forces can refuse vaccination for any disease. But it will affect the duties to which he can be assigned.
It's been adjudicated. The law is what it is.
No, that's wrong.
They did make that decision.
As I said, natural selection will eventually take care of this, just as it did when smallpox vaccinations were first developed.
If you think so, you don't have any understanding of Karl Popper at all.
I see in modern Darwinism the most successful explanation of the relevant facts. [Popper, 1957, p. 106
The Mendelian underpinning of modern Darwinism has been well tested and so has the theory of evolution which says that all terrestrial life has evolved from a few primitive unicellular organisms, possibly even from one single organism. [Popper, 1978, p. 344;
It does appear that some people think that I denied scientific character to the historical sciences, such as palaeontology, or the history of the evolution of life on Earth. This is a mistake, and I here wish to affirm that these and other historical sciences have in my opinion scientific character; their hypotheses can in many cases be tested. [Popper, 1981, p. 611]
Halstead's defence against irrelevancy - Nature
Popper has been rather egregiously misquoted by creationists. Back to the subject...
I just think it's foolish to believe 2.2% of doctors rather than the 97.8% of them
If you consider medical journals to be corrupt sources, you've lost contact with reality. At the end, all you seem to have is "all the doctors are lying."
But you can't show that it happened? Pretty sure why.
You're wrong about the second part. For example a person in the armed forces can refuse vaccination for any disease. But it will affect the duties to which he can be assigned.
It's been adjudicated. The law is what it is.
No, that's wrong.
They did make that decision.
WASHINGTON, DC – The American Medical Association (AMA), American Pharmacists Association (APhA), and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) strongly oppose the ordering, prescribing, or dispensing of ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19 outside of a clinical trial.
Ivermectin is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for human use to treat infections caused by internal and external parasites. It is not approved to prevent or treat COVID-19. Ivermectin is also available to treat certain veterinary conditions; medications formulated or intended for use in animals should not be used by humans. We are alarmed by reports that outpatient prescribing for and dispensing of ivermectin have increased 24-fold since before the pandemic and increased exponentially over the past few months. As such, we are calling for an immediate end to the prescribing, dispensing, and use of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 outside of a clinical trial. In addition, we are urging physicians, pharmacists, and other prescribers—trusted health care professionals in their communities—to warn patients against the use of ivermectin outside of FDA-approved indications and guidance, whether intended for use in humans or animals, as well as purchasing ivermectin from online stores. Veterinary forms of this medication are highly concentrated for large animals and pose a significant toxicity risk for humans.
AMA, APhA, ASHP statement on ending use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19
Why the Right Still Embraces Ivermectin
Five years after the pandemic began, interest in the anti-parasitic drug is rising again as right-wing influencers promote it — and spread misinformation about it.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/31/us/ivermectin-conservatives-influencers.html
As I said, natural selection will eventually take care of this, just as it did when smallpox vaccinations were first developed.
Smallpox was a real immunization. There is no cure for the common cold, or any virus. Covid was experimental, and did not immunize anyone.If you think so, you don't have any understanding of Karl Popper at all.
I see in modern Darwinism the most successful explanation of the relevant facts. [Popper, 1957, p. 106
The Mendelian underpinning of modern Darwinism has been well tested and so has the theory of evolution which says that all terrestrial life has evolved from a few primitive unicellular organisms, possibly even from one single organism. [Popper, 1978, p. 344;
It does appear that some people think that I denied scientific character to the historical sciences, such as palaeontology, or the history of the evolution of life on Earth. This is a mistake, and I here wish to affirm that these and other historical sciences have in my opinion scientific character; their hypotheses can in many cases be tested. [Popper, 1981, p. 611]
Halstead's defence against irrelevancy - Nature
Popper has been rather egregiously misquoted by creationists. Back to the subject...
I just think it's foolish to believe 2.2% of doctors rather than the 97.8% of them
If you consider medical journals to be corrupt sources, you've lost contact with reality. At the end, all you seem to have is "all the doctors are lying."
But you can't show that it happened? Pretty sure why.
You're wrong about the second part. For example a person in the armed forces can refuse vaccination for any disease. But it will affect the duties to which he can be assigned.
It's been adjudicated. The law is what it is.
No, that's wrong.
They did make that decision.
WASHINGTON, DC – The American Medical Association (AMA), American Pharmacists Association (APhA), and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) strongly oppose the ordering, prescribing, or dispensing of ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19 outside of a clinical trial.
Ivermectin is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for human use to treat infections caused by internal and external parasites. It is not approved to prevent or treat COVID-19. Ivermectin is also available to treat certain veterinary conditions; medications formulated or intended for use in animals should not be used by humans. We are alarmed by reports that outpatient prescribing for and dispensing of ivermectin have increased 24-fold since before the pandemic and increased exponentially over the past few months. As such, we are calling for an immediate end to the prescribing, dispensing, and use of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 outside of a clinical trial. In addition, we are urging physicians, pharmacists, and other prescribers—trusted health care professionals in their communities—to warn patients against the use of ivermectin outside of FDA-approved indications and guidance, whether intended for use in humans or animals, as well as purchasing ivermectin from online stores. Veterinary forms of this medication are highly concentrated for large animals and pose a significant toxicity risk for humans.
AMA, APhA, ASHP statement on ending use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19
Why the Right Still Embraces Ivermectin
Five years after the pandemic began, interest in the anti-parasitic drug is rising again as right-wing influencers promote it — and spread misinformation about it.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/31/us/ivermectin-conservatives-influencers.html
As I said, natural selection will eventually take care of this, just as it did when smallpox vaccinations were first developed.
And as you learned, so is the COVID immunization. Both of these produce a pretty good immunity. However, the smallpox immunization does have some serious contraindications. Because smallpox vaccine is a live-virus vaccine, giving the vaccine to people with certain medical conditions can cause serious infection or even death.
Smallpox is a virus. As are measles, mumps, rubella, yellow fever, rabies etc. There are effective vaccines for all of these.
And then, after numerous trials, it was authorized by the FDA for general use. Only then was it give to the general public. Would you like me to show you that?
No, that's wrong, too.
The only reason the pandemic ended when it did was because of the vaccines and those willing to do the right thing and get them.
Those vaccines were worthless because nobody I knew got the shot, but got covid and that was thousands in my Church. Everyone who got covid, including me, got over it in 3 days. I gained lifetime immunity and those who got the shot didn't.
Let's look again at what Popper has to say about it.
As you have seen, the evidence shows that even the first formulation of the COVID-19 vaccine provides pretty good protection against subsequent varieties of the virus. Would you like me to show you again?
The vaccine wasn't formulated to prevent infection. It was formulated to prevent serious illness or death. And it worked very well. The COVID death rate for unvaccinated people was about ten times higher than the COVID death rate for vaccinated people.
I studies I saw showed the death rate increased for the vaccinated as covid progressed. I would love to see a study of the mortality of Christians who were unvaccinated, and I'm not talking cults either, real born again from above Christians. The Holy Spirit told me not to take it, if you have the fear of God in you, that's says more than detective studies. I said detective because scienctists are detectives, they can only find what God made in creation. Jeremiah 17:5 - Cursed is a man who trusts in man, and makes flesh his strength, whose heart departs from the Lord.
