My bad, I went totally off topic. I don't think those are reasons to call yall idolaters. Those are just my disagreements with your catechism. Sorry!This Vale Of Tears said:We would need a whole 'nother thread to discuss all those issues. I don't think that simple beliefs about Mary, that she was conceived immaculately, that she remained forever a virgin, or that she was coronated in heaven by God, are idolizing her, especially if we're using the model of Old Testament idolatry where objects, elements, or people are made into deities to be served and worshipped. I'm not dismissing all your objections, just trying to keep the discussion on focus.
Yall did not do away with the 2nd commandment. Saying anything else is setting up a strawman. The Romans have never taught anything other than worship of the Trinity.This Vale Of Tears said:I'm also very interested in your estimation of the claim that the Catholic Church did away with the 2nd commandment. I think a very clear line should be drawn between Protestants who disagree with what Catholics actually believe and teach and those who make up strawmen to assail, claiming the Church effaced the prohibition against graven images made to be worshipped as gods. Anyone who makes untruthful claims like that should be rebuked.
Btw, I hope I'm not annoying you by steering clear of the phrase "Catholic Church". Many Romans believe that only members of their physical organization are part of the Church, and all others are not. The Church is the saved, and by calling your church the Catholic Church, I eliminate myself from salvation. It's not an insult, I simply am careful to emphasize that the Catholic Church is made up of more than a physical organization (even if the original). I call yall Romans because of your See. Not all Catholics are Romans and not all Romans are Catholics. Some Catholics are Lutheran, some Catholics are Anglican, some Catholics are unborn and don't know one from the other.