I can relate with both different views.LOL
He's really not wrong!
Read it again...
Sorry I like these little images.Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I can relate with both different views.LOL
He's really not wrong!
Read it again...
Sorry I like these little images.Well then, by jove, use them !I can relate with both different views.![]()
Sorry I like these little images.
No sorry, Adam was the first human “son of God”.... what makes one a “son” of the Almighty, is the fact that he created them. Every angel is a created “son of God”, as is God’s “firstborn”...who existed before all of them, and was instrumental in their creation. (Col 1:15-16)I am not a dichotamist, I am a trichotomous.
Adam was the first son of God. (Luke 3:38).
Where will I find that written? Adam was not born....but was created directly by God. The spirit he had in him was the same “spirit” that animates all living earthly creatures. We all breathe the same air....and die the same death....we stop breathing, and our body returns to the dust. (Eccl 3:19-20; Gen 3:19)He was created with the christ spirit' in him, that Jesus was born with.
Nope, not even close. The body that God formed was designed to procreate, again like all living things on this planet...are designed to replicate their “kind” in perpetuity....only humans were created with a spiritual nature and with superior intelligence which included a desire to worship the one who created them....the one they recognize as their “Father”.And Adam was created a triune being to begin with. God created dirt, formed that dirt into a dead human body. He then breathed a spirit into that body. It was a spirit born from the Holy Spirit ("that which is born of/from the Spirit is spirit").
There is no doubt that as oxygen filled the cells in his lifeless body, that Adam came to life....”life” as defined in the Bible for living souls. Sentient creatures are those who feel what we feel...pain, happiness, hunger, discomfort, love, hate, anger, joy....feelings are hard to quantify.....but we all have them.The spirit is the ANIMATING life-force of the body. With that spirit the dead 'BRAIN/soul, began to function as a LIVING 'mind, will, emotions'. The 'mind' soul was led of the spirit from first breath and the body obeyed the 'will emotions' function of the soul making man an immortal "living soul". That changed when Adam quit being led of the spirit and was tempted by "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life" (the 3 root sources of every sin a man commits).
That is when Adam and his wife began their time on ‘death row’. God had given them an assignment to “fill the earth and subdue it”.....so he allowed the first part of that assignment to go ahead, in spite of the awful inheritance of sin and inevitable death that would result for their children.That's when Adam's soul went from being a "living soul", to a 'dying soul', but still a triune being.
Yes, a knowledge of anatomy is useful but not when it is misapplied.Dichotamists needed to take anatomy, like I did. And then study their bibles a bit harder.
JAM 2:26 For as the body without the (divine spark) spirit (from God) is dead,
Hi WalterWhat does interpretation mean?
In my opinion it is: To get the understanding the Bible is trying to explain.
================================================================================================
For example, think about it if, you have 3 scriptures and I have 3 scriptures that do not agree with your 3, has either one of us found a correct interpretation? No.
If we want the Bibles view wouldn't we have to include every scripture we can find on the subject?
Would you like me to provide a example? ..... What Bible topic interests you?
I will get some scriptures together. Thank You so much for the kind words.Hi Walter
You've hit upon one of my pet peeves about the bible.
The fact that almost anything can be proven.
I agree with you that one has to read ALL scripture on a subject and not pick one verse out,,,or even a couple.
Actually, I'm only interested, at the end of years of discussion, in just a couple of topics that I feel are very important.
Here they are:
1. We are to obey God. Some tell me that our good works (which is obeying God) are like filthy rags to God.
2. OSAS. I don't see this doctrine anywhere in scripture, and yet some post verses that sound like it's true.
So...what to do?
What do YOU believe the solution to be?
Go ahead and provide an example...
use OSAS.
Hey WalterI will get some scriptures together. Thank You so much for the kind words.
I will give you scriptures only, so I'm not adding any narrative or extra meaning, I have a tendency to feel that if it's in the Bible, It's in there for a good reason.
Yes I agree, with just a few scriptures you can prove just about anything.You've hit upon one of my pet peeves about the bible.
The fact that almost anything can be proven.
That's an interesting method.Yes I agree, with just a few scriptures you can prove just about anything.
Here is something I found to be true, take any Bible topic and look for as many scriptures as you can find on that topic.
the majority will compliment each-other but a few of them will disagree.
Then I go to studybible.info, and click the single verse I want to do research on, then I click compare in other Bible versions, then a page comes up with 60 or so different Bibles, and here I can find a Bible that renders that particular verse in a different way, that agrees with the majority of scriptures I already have. *My goal is finding 100% agreement.
I will add more words in a little while I'm in the hospital and I have to go do something right now..
You are irrevocably Saved the moment you believe .As I'm sitting in church my mind is rolling like my usual analytical mentally ill self haha. ivte made a couple posts before on how my mindset is a struggle with being a Christian, analytical, constant questioning etc ...so since definitely for myself and for many others since it's so hard to have certainity, at what point do you actually become a Christian?
Growing up I thought feelings mattered(the big saving moment) I had one, I had always considered myself a Christian, I had someone pray over me during a Christian festival around 30 years ago and I definitely thought I noticed and felt a difference and it lasted with me for a while. 5 or 10 years ago I would of considered that my true beginning, but now since we have all these professionals (sarcasm) we realize feelings don't matter!..supposedly to many sides of Christianity....
It's been a tough journey on my end due to my own mental issues however since certainity is only attained by a miracle for me, what exactly is a Christian and at what point does it start? Is it once we start following Christ instructions and lifestyle as best as possible with hope in Him, some say the baptism is mandatory....with of course His grace.
I use three websites Biblehub.com, Bible Gateway.com and studybible.infohat's an interesting method.
If you just google: John 1:1 biblehub ---it brings you to a biblehub page with almost all of the translations.
Uhh, because their sinful natured bodies have a life force, just like I had before my spirit was BORN AGAIN. Do I still sin? HELL YES!!! Not cussing, simply a fact. So how can I, AND YOU, still sin if we have a 'new spirit' from God dwelling IN our bodies?.If the spirit is the animating life force...
how come even non believers have this life force?
Being born a perfect lamb did not fulfill the inspection of the priests to cut its throat on the feast of Passover. I quoted One scripture giving your view one black eye. Your second rebuttaled opinion still pales without one scripture to support your opinion. I'll give you 3 scriptures, for my opinion.It's good that you're moving on because it is NOT Christian theology that Jesus was not born perfect...
Jesus WAS BORN PERFECT.....
Theology teaches that for the atonement to function...
it required a PERFECT MAN
That foundation was changed with the Church of ROME. The foundation of the NT APOSTOLIC church was JESUS, and the foundation of the church of Rome was PETER. ROMAN influence reigned for 1500 years. I guThis is why SOLA SCRIPTURA does not function.
Better minds than ours have laid the foundation for Christianity and its teachings.
Not us.
Are you a ROMAN CATHOLIC? If not, then what denomination do you best fit in?I believe in the IC.
God DID NOT place His Son in the body of a sinful woman.
Jesus taught that those who are born again do not continue to sin because God's life is in them, making it impossible for them to live in sin as they did before. This concept is emphasized in 1 John 3:9, which states that anyone born of God does not practice sin.Uhh, because their sinful natured bodies have a life force, just like I had before my spirit was BORN AGAIN. Do I still sin? HELL YES!!! Not cussing, simply a fact. So how can I, AND YOU, still sin if we have a 'new spirit' from God dwelling IN our bodies?.
Being born a perfect lamb did not fulfill the inspection of the priests to cut its throat on the feast of Passover. I quoted One scripture giving your view one black eye. Your second rebuttaled opinion still pales without one scripture to support your opinion. I'll give you 3 scriptures, for my opinion.
HEB 2:10 For it was fitting that he/GOD, for whom and by whom all things exist, in bringing many sons to glory, should make the pioneer/JESUS of their salvation perfect through suffering.
ROM 8:3 .....God sending his own Son in the likeness/homoioma of sinful flesh, .....:
Now I'll give another scripture with the same greek word and context.
PHI 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness/homoioma of men:
I believe this "form" that Jesus had, means a sinful flesh/body just like us. That doesn't mean "likeness" means he looked exactly like me in the mirror.
Now produce ONE scripture to support your opinion. Or don't answer at all, and just accept a new truth in place of an old lie.
That foundation was changed with the Church of ROME. The foundation of the NT APOSTOLIC church was JESUS, and the foundation of the church of Rome was PETER. ROMAN influence reigned for 1500 years. I gu
Are you a ROMAN CATHOLIC? If not, then what denomination do you best fit in?
And if your 'are' or you 'aren't' a RC, briefly tell me what the doctrine of 'the Immaculate conception' is.
NOT TRUE. When God made the FIRST ADAM out of dirt in west EDEN, He also made a bunch of other humans. Often referred in "THEOLOGY" circles as the PRE ADAMIC RACE. But they haven't got 'their theology' exactly right either IMO. Their view does help explain where CAIN and ABLE got their wives from though.Adam was the first human “son of God”.... what makes one a “son” of the Almighty, is the fact that he created them.
COL 1:15 He/JESUS is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation;Every angel is a created “son of God”, as is God’s “firstborn”...who existed before all of them, and was instrumental in their creation. (Col 1:15-16)
Yes, the spirit ADAM was created as having, was the same spirit as the "LIVING"/Chay CREATURES/Nephesh" and those same Hebrew words get translated as "LIVING/Chay SOUL/Nephesh" when applied to Adam. And that spirit from GOD birthed FROM The Holy Spirit, had to be BORN AGAIN before Adam was taken to the Garden. End of story....from the BIBLE and not tweaked JW theologians.Where will I find that written? Adam was not born....but was created directly by God. The spirit he had in him was the same “spirit” that animates all living earthly creatures. We all breathe the same air....and die the same death....we stop breathing, and our body returns to the dust. (Eccl 3:19-20; Gen 3:19)
I’m glad you mentioned that this “pre Adamic race” was from “theology”....because it is certainly not from the Bible, and makes no sense in the big picture. It makes a mockery of creation and Jesus’ role as redeemer.NOT TRUE. When God made the FIRST ADAM out of dirt in west EDEN, He also made a bunch of other humans. Often referred in "THEOLOGY" circles as the PRE ADAMIC RACE. But they haven't got 'their theology' exactly right either IMO. Their view does help explain where CAIN and ABLE got their wives from though.
I looked up this word and when it speaks of a “host” it was referring to all creation.....GEN 2:1* Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host/tsaba' of them.
6635 tsaba': a mass of persons (or fig. things),espec. reg. organized for war (an army); by impl. a campaign, lit. or fig. (spec. hardship, worship).
Say what?.....The Holy Spirit birthed all the spirits "that which is born of/FROM the Spirit is spirits." which were put into all those animal and humans. They all had been CREATED with UN-annointed spirits in them. IOW not smeared with annointing oil by God.
And I will find this idea in what particular passage of the Bible?What made the first son of God, a son, was the FACT that the HOLY SPIRIT first re-birthed (born again) the spirit in "the FIRST MAN ADAM" of the ADAMIC RACE, and nobody else. God then planted a Garden in EAST EDEN. He then came back and took that first man ADAM out of the WORLD of UN-regenerated mankind/ADAMS and placed him in that GARDEN in EAST EDEN.
Col 1:15-18 states about Jesus......You verse above says nothing about Jesus being an angel who existed before the other angels. The first Adam was not born of a woman, his body was created from 'scratch dirt' along with "HOST". of mankind/ And all of that creation in Genesis came from the spoken WORD of God. The Father was invisible, the Word was invisible and the Holy Spirit was invisible. Because "GOD IS SPIRIT".
When God wanted to manifest visibly to man, he sent his angels to convey his will to his earthly servants because nothing sinful can come before the Holiest person in existence.But when God wanted to manifest VISIBLY to His creation He put the same spirit he put in ADAM in a body which came from GOD. And the WORD became FLESH in Mary with her seed giving Jesus a body/flesh. Then the Holy Spirit put an anointed christo spirit in Him FROM EL ELYON "the MOST HIGH GOD". The God who was higher than the ELOHIM God of creatioon. That's how the spirit WORD came to get the title THE SON OF MAN.
Again...say what??? Where the heck do you get this stuff?! We tweaked nothing.....you have added to the story and taken it down a whole other path...there is nothing biblical in your version of things.Yes, the spirit ADAM was created as having, was the same spirit as the "LIVING"/Chay CREATURES/Nephesh" and those same Hebrew words get translated as "LIVING/Chay SOUL/Nephesh" when applied to Adam. And that spirit from GOD birthed FROM The Holy Spirit, had to be BORN AGAIN before Adam was taken to the Garden. End of story....from the BIBLE and not tweaked JW theologians.![]()
No sorry.......the human Jesus died the same kind of death that Adam did, because that is why he was called “the last Adam”....he paid back what Adam forfeited for all his children.....everlasting life in paradise on earth. God’s law demanded equivalency....”an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life”. Without the savior sent by God to rescue Adam’s children, there was no way out of the dilemma....sin and death would continue forever. Jesus paid the debt, and allowed Adam’s children to reclaim what their first parents lost.When Jesus died on the cross He surrendered his holy spirit to the Father. And when that spirit left Jesus, his animating life force was gone. His brain died and then he "BREATHED HIS LAST". Unlike your belief that He quit breathing and then died. NOT BIBLICAL,
Yes, her breath was returned, just like a paramedic doing CPR.....once the heart resumes beating, breathing is restored. There is nothing about any wind up her nose, but there is nothing like that said about Adam either....it was a gentle introduction to life, just as the raising of Jairus’ daughter was a simple awakening from “sleep” as Jesus said.When Jesus raised the little girl from death, what did He do? CPR? No! "her spirit returned" Luk 8:55. She became alive because of her SPIRIT returning, not because Jesus blew a big wind up her nose.
That is so warped, I am shaking my head.....you have reinvented Genesis....and rewritten the entire Bible narrative. Who needed to do that....I wonder?Because the spirit of christ was first born as a spirit which was put in the man named ADAM. And it was 'that spirit' which made ADAM the first son of God. The first time the christos/anointed spirit was first born in a WOMAN was the second time their was a 'son of God' but only the first time that spirit was BORN IN A WOMAN of flesh.
You decide, wouldn't all the scriptures be important?1. We are to obey God. Some tell me that our good works (which is obeying God) are like filthy rags to God.
1JO 3:9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.Jesus taught that those who are born again do not continue to sin because God's life is in them, making it impossible for them to live in sin as they did before. This concept is emphasized in 1 John 3:9, which states that anyone born of God does not practice sin.Bible Hub
renner.org

I've met Christians who will insist they're still sinners needing forgiveness.This verse was always a problem in my early years when people fought over it because that one extra word, which you used was never quoted. That word was "PRACTICE" sin. And it wasn't quoted because no translation ever said 'those who PRACTICE SIN.'
KJV 1JO 3:9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and
RSV 1JO 3:9 No one born of God commits sin; for God's nature abides in him, and he cannot sin because he is born of God.
NAS 1JO 3:9 No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
YLT 1JO 3:9 every one who hath been begotten of God, sin he doth not, because his seed in him doth remain, and he is not able to sin, because of God he hath been begotten.
But that changed when the Nearly Inspired Translation came out in 1976. I was born again in 1972, and refused then and now, to believe that nobody ever got it right before the NIV.
NIV 1JO 3:9 No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God's seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God.
I do my own study and interpreting because I believe 1Joh mandates that.
1JO 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
Otherwise you are going to be indoctrinated or brainwashed by the theologians who have taught so many lies that we have 40,000 (+-) denominations all believing that 'they' are right and 'everybody else is WRONG. Welcome to the NON CHRISTIAN church of the world today.
So, who HERE wants to tell, ME and all of us ,your theological REASON for why "PRACTICE SIN" and "cannot go on sinning," are your 'confessions' and 'scriptural belief' too.
IF anyone here can do that, I may just have to come back and tell you why YOU'RE ALL BELIEVING WRONG.....In My Humble Opinion, of course.![]()
I can't believe you posted your last post while I was editing it to you.I've met Christians who will insist they're still sinners needing forgiveness.
Sad.
I believe that 'willfully sinning' or not, is not the point of the verse. Is that what you're intimating? I believe it's saying a "CHRISTIAN" will not sin. I also believe this verse is poorly translated when it says "Whosoever/Whoever/No one" as the first word of the verse.The point of the scripture as I see it is to let us know,now that we are conscious of the Spirit and his communication,we know not to wilfully sin.
This is contrary to the anti-Christ rhetoric enemies of the cross use in claiming we can wilfully sin and be OK.
We make mistakes but we know that.