- Dec 14, 2009
- 5,169
- 3,579
- 113
- 78
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death. James 1:15
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
A person can easly have a desire for something/anything, but it don't have to be a sinful nature to indulge, or to lust after.And your comment or thoughts on this are..................?
Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death. James 1:15
Hi Helen, The passage: Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.Yep...that is what it says...
....but, I need more thoughts here...for me to comment upon. :)
Hi Helen, The passage: Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.
To me it is like, being married and wanting to have somebody else wife or husband, or like a person just not having enough of something.
You are correct in the above, But I would say that "I shall not want" anything that is of a sinful nature. And what about you? since it is a personal relationship with our creator from the garden.This scripture always takes me back to the Garden.
The Serpent knew the power of lust. He knew that Eve lusting was not going to be enough.
She saw the tree was good for knowledge...she was getting hooked by him..but still not sinning. But when she ate of what was being offered..(wisdom)..she had fallen...she had conceived the lie.
The lie that she was not already complete in her relationship with God.
The Deceiver told her that there was more... she bought the lie.
I lust chocolate very often... eating it is only sin if I had been given a law by God, not to eat it.
Praise God, temptation is not sin. :)
So I am linking your response to marriage. Any spouse who cheats on their spouse have accepted the lie ''that they do not have a complete relationship with their spouse''. They think that they will get the ''missing links'' outside marriage.This scripture always takes me back to the Garden.
The Serpent knew the power of lust. He knew that Eve lusting was not going to be enough.
She saw the tree was good for knowledge...she was getting hooked by him..but still not sinning. But when she ate of what was being offered..(wisdom)..she had fallen...she had conceived the lie.
The lie that she was not already complete in her relationship with God.
The Deceiver told her that there was more... she bought the lie.
I lust chocolate very often... eating it is only sin if I had been given a law by God, not to eat it.
Praise God, temptation is not sin. :)
This type of lust goes for women/girls also, and Jesus said:
But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. I don't think it means that a person has done the act, but it does have the awareness of the act before it happen.
There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.
1 Corinthians 10:13
The above is the reason why each party male and female must keep his/Jesus commandments. John 14:15
lol, the goal should be to be able to testify on how well one is dealing with the failure of the law after all, right.I have asked many before...but somehow they are reluctant to answer on how well they are 'making it work!!'![]()
i see a lot of...well, essentially denial that any works can be done in Grace at all?
well, i guess that is where "it is finished" gets applied by them, and i can't help but think these ppl are kind of...watching a movie, too?That is foolishness ...Then they do not really understand grace.
Grace is never without accountability...Paul makes that very plain.
Grace with no accountability make the message of grace a mockery.
but then if one is convinced that they should be prepared to give a defense of their faith to strangers, wouldn't that mean that by definition they were not loving them to begin with? i mean, can anyone suggest a scenario in which they were being loving to everyone, and that doctrine getting them into a situation in which otherwise disengaged ppl would be asking them to defend their doctrine? rather than saying "thank you" to them, iow, if anythingso then, i got one for ya; some clueless guy snags my ice cream on a hot day, and boy do i let him have it! Now, who might i have to be prepared to give a defense of my faith to in that scenario, do you imagine, after the works i have just manifested?
What we need to be is what God wants us to be at all times. As we may already have discovered that is not such an easy task. Actually, without God's help it is one of those impossible things.but then if one is convinced that they should be prepared to give a defense of their faith to strangers,
That little phrase of yours is saying what I am saying. Our lives should demonstrate the answer to the questions that anyone has who is really hungry and thirsty for the righteousness of God [see Matt 5:6]. Our lives will then be at least what they need in the moment of our encounter with them.wouldn't that mean that by definition they were not loving them to begin with?
If we really do love God as He wants us to, will we not be preparing ourselves to face every person or situation God will put before us? Some will walk a lukewarm walk and then wonder why they seemed to be no help at all when confronted with someone who is really was hungry and thirsty.i mean, can anyone suggest a scenario in which they were being loving to everyone, and that doctrine getting them into a situation in which otherwise disengaged ppl would be asking them to defend their doctrine? rather than saying "thank you" to them, iow, if anything
Proselytizing I guess could be a good thing, but whenever I purposely tried it [many years ago] I was definitely not successful because I did not know what I was doing and no one else who should have been able to advise me could... Unless a person is really called by God to do exactly that, I would not. A person should would rather do exactly what God does call him to do. Do we each know what that is?and don't get me wrong, the scenarios exist, i have one or two, but the elements are all seemingly different from the Standard Proselytizing Model, let's say. i don't recall anyone ever asking me why i was being loving back then, unless it was a friend or family member, back then, too. Anyone?
ha i've found that dogs help there immensely, when in doubt just follow them lolWhat we need to be is what God wants us to be at all times. As we may already have discovered that is not such an easy task. Actually, without God's help it is one of those impossible things.
well, i guess that is where "it is finished" gets applied by them, and i can't help but think these ppl are kind of...watching a movie, too?
which i am currently questioning for its validity, but that doesn't mean it has none, @ScottA exhibits quite a bit of grace, and i see analogs of "rest" in this too, even if i currently have to agree with you in principle, if for no other reason than that these ppl still have works, just like you and i do, and their works are still being judged, just like ours are; even the ones who insist that they need have no works to be "saved."
Now I agree that to maintain an ongoing day to day relationship we do choose to spend time with the Lord ...but liked we have talk before...this is the works of a love relationship. All of our works are for loves sake...or they are just hollow and what Paul calls dead-work. ( ie wrong motivation) in trying to earn something from God, but not from the heart. Everything comes back to the heart.if for no other reason than that these ppl still have works, just like you and i do, and their works are still being judged, just like ours are; even the ones who insist that they need have no works to be "saved."
There is truth in what you say. I have always loved dogs because they do the right thing without thinking about it. They are criticized because they don't always do what people think is the right thing. Perhaps if dogs could talk they would really tell us how it is like Balaam's donkey.ha i've found that dogs help there immensely, when in doubt just follow them lol
being as how we ask little kids what to do as a joke, i mean