Which is worse ?
What Paul did, that is, not know Christ, but God, and persecute Christians ?
(I have seen two film depictions on the Damascus experience. The first one the director chose to have God's voice sound angry. But in the second, the director had His voice sound gentle, and with much love and compassion.)
OR
To be an unbeliever altogether and hate the entire trinity ?
Just asking, cause I know both kinds of people.
For the record, I know neither are saved. I was just wondering if it had any difference in life.
But regarding Paul's experience with God Almighty intervening Himself, I would like to think it was done with compassion. I mean, God knows everything, so He knew Saul/Paul would believe. But would he have if God had not intervened ? I just wonder sometimes. Most times I think not. That's why God chose to nudge him. :lol:
God saw something in Saul He knew He could use for sure is all I know !
What Paul did, that is, not know Christ, but God, and persecute Christians ?
(I have seen two film depictions on the Damascus experience. The first one the director chose to have God's voice sound angry. But in the second, the director had His voice sound gentle, and with much love and compassion.)
OR
To be an unbeliever altogether and hate the entire trinity ?
Just asking, cause I know both kinds of people.
For the record, I know neither are saved. I was just wondering if it had any difference in life.
But regarding Paul's experience with God Almighty intervening Himself, I would like to think it was done with compassion. I mean, God knows everything, so He knew Saul/Paul would believe. But would he have if God had not intervened ? I just wonder sometimes. Most times I think not. That's why God chose to nudge him. :lol:
God saw something in Saul He knew He could use for sure is all I know !