This is just out there. I need a nap.How can Christians say with a straight face that both men and women who are saved make up the bride and wife of Christ AND homosexuality is condemned?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
This is just out there. I need a nap.How can Christians say with a straight face that both men and women who are saved make up the bride and wife of Christ AND homosexuality is condemned?
i guess there is quite a bit of debate about arsenokoitai, there seems to even be a valid argument that Paul coined the term? Greeks apparently had no probs with “homosexual,” near as i can tell.The point of this thread is why does the Bible call men to be the Bride and Wife of Christ WHILE also condemning homosexuality. Then, this apparent contradiction becomes an understandable wedge issue for why people don’t believe, don’t come to Christ.
I think God's statement regarding homosexuality (Leviticus 18:22) is quite clear.Just finished reading Revelations. I'll add the verses later but it occurred to me why people don't believe and it involves sex and time.
Regarding sex; condemnations against homosexuality has to be seen as in the context of the Bride and Wife of the Lamb, who is made up of many men.
Regarding time; Jesus says he is coming soon and very soon. See Rev 22:7, 12, 22. At another place, he says his return is before this generation will pass. It is under obvious that the Apostles thought the End Times, the 2nd Coming of Christ would be in their lifetimes.
To resist the concerns of these points, is IMO, like the wind against a kite - the cause of the disbelief to rise, to be reinforced and solidified. While Christ followers seem to find it easier to address the concerns over sex, the tendency is to defend the concerns over time, which either goes against 2 Corinthians 1:13 or is condescending of their "understanding", such as a day is like a thousand years to the LORD. (This side steps the point of the timing for us humans.)
Rather than defend HOW Scripture is right and our understanding it wrong, I think it would be more effective at persuasion to concede that these are concerning matters (you understand their concerns) and that like them, you too don't fully understand all of Scripture (without going into specifics), then turn attention to why you do believe and why they should believe also.
IMO, this is an opportunity to build a relationship with other image bearer's of God rather than deepen the divide over theological minutia - compared to helping to bring another soul to Christ. Thoughts?
Agreed. That is not the point. The point is how do you reconcile the prohibition against homosexuality with men comprising some of the Bride & Wife of Christ?I think God's statement regarding homosexuality (Leviticus 18:22) is quite clear.
Naturally, there are people that would want to turn the "bride of Christ" reference into a sexual thing. To them, life and sex are synonymous. But I think it is reference to the need for us to be in constant prayer (1 Thessalonians 5:17).Agreed. That is not the point. The point is how do you reconcile the prohibition against homosexuality with men comprising some of the Bride & Wife of Christ?
Naturally, there are people that would want to turn the "bride of Christ" reference into a sexual thing.
I think you are still missing what this thread is about if you replace men with the church. Those that don't believe will not find this obtuse response an effective persuasion tool. How can Christians say with a straight face that both men and women who are saved make up the bride and wife of Christ AND homosexuality is condemned?
the Kingdom of Heaven is like field too.
a lot of things are symbolic and comparisons.
Symbolically advocate for the Sun of homosexuality? There has to be a compelling response to people who don’t believe because of the time and sex contradictions.
Given homosexuality is a sin, why symbolically suggest it?
Hopefully marriage is more than that.AS IF marriage is for any other reason than sex and life (through time via descendants).
There is no sex in heaven, no marriage between men and women spirits.
Interesting. Do you deny that both men and women make up the wife and bride of Christ?
I think you are still missing what this thread is about if you replace men with the church. Those that don't believe will not find this obtuse response an effective persuasion tool. How can Christians say with a straight face that both men and women who are saved make up the bride and wife of Christ AND homosexuality is condemned?
your post is unclear.
Everything is more than it’s defining characteristic.Hopefully marriage is more than that.
Who is doing that?I meant Symbolically advocate for the SIN of homosexuality?
The Bible, when it speaks of men being a Bride and Wife in a marriage.Who is doing that?
Is it necessary to have sex at all?Everything is more than it’s defining characteristic.
You cannot tell people to only have sex in marriage then deny marriage involves sex. And men being the bride to another man is gay marriage, confined in Scripture.
What do we say to this who don’t believe on this basis?
It is necessary to have marriage?Is it necessary to have sex at all?
Just finished reading Revelations. I'll add the verses later but it occurred to me why people don't believe and it involves sex and time.
Regarding sex; condemnations against homosexuality has to be seen as in the context of the Bride and Wife of the Lamb, who is made up of many men.
Regarding time; Jesus says he is coming soon and very soon. See Rev 22:7, 12, 22. At another place, he says his return is before this generation will pass. It is under obvious that the Apostles thought the End Times, the 2nd Coming of Christ would be in their lifetimes.