Those posts are not telling much of the truth about the Codex Vaticanus and Sinaiticus which Wescott and Hort used to create their new 1880s Greek New Testament text.
The Vaticanus was DISCOVERED in the Vatican in 1475. There is NO EVIDENCE of its existence back to the 3rd century A.D. like you have said in your post #6.
The Sinaiticus was only discovered in 1859 by Tischendorf in a Greek monastery. He is the one that attempted to date it, which it has not been proven to be as old as existing Greek manuscripts that show oxidation. The Sinaiticus is a 'white' colored manuscripts, SHOWING LITTLE AGING. And one Greek scholar at that monastery, Simonedes, claimed he created Sinaiticus as it was to be a gift to the Czar. It had so many errors that it became unpresentable. That is why the manuscript was found going to waste in a corner.
EVIDENCE = Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are MODERN Greek texts, much NEWER than the Greek Majority texts which Erasmus used for the Textus Receptus.
So because of what you've been posting, kind of saying one thing out of one side of your mouth, and then something totally different out of the other side of your mouth, it shows you are pushing confusion about the corruptions of the Critical texts, trying to give them an air of authenticity, while DOWNPLAYING the history of the Traditional Majority Greek texts.