Shalom, DaDad.
Second, again, you have refused to identify the BOOK for the "9:25" YOU said was "proof" for your "David BenGurion & Yitzhak Rabin -- both referred to in Scripture" statement. This is not about personalities or offenses; just answer the question! OR butt out!
Third, I don't own a Contemporary English Version of the Bible. So, I can't even look up what you claim (WHENEVER you get around to giving me the book of the Bible that you supposedly gave as "proof").
Fourth, I should apologize for YOU butting in? I don't think so. <_<
Fifth, why should I be "repentant" about something YOU haven't made clear, yet?! :wacko: That makes NO SENSE WHATSOEVER!
Sixth, I DID challenge your response. Which means that you should produce the proof or logic by which you concluded "David BenGurion & Yitzhak Rabin." That's what it means to "challenge a response!" It's just like in Scrabble: When someone gives you a word that you think is a fake word, you can challenge that word, and the person who gave the potentially "fake word" must go to a dictionary or some other source and SHOW the challenger that the word is a legitimate word! In challenging your response, I'm expecting you to provide incontrovertible proof that the two men you named were indeed "anointed" by God! You could show this by Scripture (IF you can prove that the Scripture is undeniably talking about either of these men) or you could show this historically (IF you can produce a time and place when either of these men were literally "anointed" by God). If you cannot, then perhaps you shouldn't have named them. (In which case, I've won the challenge.) If you CAN show that either of these men was indeed a "messiah," then you have won the challenge! It doesn't give you permission to IGNORE the challenge and issue your own!
By the way, a "euphemism" is defined as "a mild or indirect word or expression substituted for one considered to be too harsh or blunt when referring to something unpleasant or embarrassing: 'downsizing' is a euphemism for 'cuts.'"
Just stick to the facts, and leave the emotions out of it, please.
Not really, brother. It didn't help much at all. First, you need to understand that I started this thread to talk about the concept of the "antichrist," and I thought it would be best to first discuss what a "christ" is. Instead, you have tried to change the subject. Please start your own threads when you desire to change subjects.DaDad said:#1.. You are NOT the only audience.
#2. The citation stands as amplified by the CEV.
#3. You discount that which you do not understand (?how was that for a euphemism?), and continue as such. But if you apologize, then we move on.
#4. I provided which you requested (and gladly so), but you do not and are unrepentant.
#5. If you are as intelligent as you pretend, then you should grasp that you challenged me, and I challenged you. And if you wish to skew the conversation such that I "DEMANDED" from you, then please consider your unequal application of personal responsibility (... another euphemism ...) in your ~taking offense~.
Hope this helps,
DD
Second, again, you have refused to identify the BOOK for the "9:25" YOU said was "proof" for your "David BenGurion & Yitzhak Rabin -- both referred to in Scripture" statement. This is not about personalities or offenses; just answer the question! OR butt out!
Third, I don't own a Contemporary English Version of the Bible. So, I can't even look up what you claim (WHENEVER you get around to giving me the book of the Bible that you supposedly gave as "proof").
Fourth, I should apologize for YOU butting in? I don't think so. <_<
Fifth, why should I be "repentant" about something YOU haven't made clear, yet?! :wacko: That makes NO SENSE WHATSOEVER!
Sixth, I DID challenge your response. Which means that you should produce the proof or logic by which you concluded "David BenGurion & Yitzhak Rabin." That's what it means to "challenge a response!" It's just like in Scrabble: When someone gives you a word that you think is a fake word, you can challenge that word, and the person who gave the potentially "fake word" must go to a dictionary or some other source and SHOW the challenger that the word is a legitimate word! In challenging your response, I'm expecting you to provide incontrovertible proof that the two men you named were indeed "anointed" by God! You could show this by Scripture (IF you can prove that the Scripture is undeniably talking about either of these men) or you could show this historically (IF you can produce a time and place when either of these men were literally "anointed" by God). If you cannot, then perhaps you shouldn't have named them. (In which case, I've won the challenge.) If you CAN show that either of these men was indeed a "messiah," then you have won the challenge! It doesn't give you permission to IGNORE the challenge and issue your own!
By the way, a "euphemism" is defined as "a mild or indirect word or expression substituted for one considered to be too harsh or blunt when referring to something unpleasant or embarrassing: 'downsizing' is a euphemism for 'cuts.'"
Just stick to the facts, and leave the emotions out of it, please.