Rev.20:2.shturt678 said:Thank you for your response again!
For the heck of it tried to find one place in Rev. Chapter 20 where I could agree to agree just a little - couldn't!
Old agreeing to disagree Jack, ie, hey, I tried.
Floyd.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Rev.20:2.shturt678 said:Thank you for your response again!
For the heck of it tried to find one place in Rev. Chapter 20 where I could agree to agree just a little - couldn't!
Old agreeing to disagree Jack, ie, hey, I tried.
Floyd said:
[SIZE=14pt]V.8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall (a)worship him every one whose name is not written in the ( B)book of the life of the Lamb slain, from the foundation of the world.[/SIZE]
Thank you for caring again!
<Snip> only for clarity.
Any who try to argue against these truths, are identifying themselves as "antichrist" in the plural!
shturt678 said:Let's take another look at Rev.13:8, "And they shall do obeisance to him all those dwelling on the earth,..." Because of the beast's authority over the world of men, "they shall do obeisance to him.." Repeating my old notes regarding this: "In most willing submission they shall bow to the antichristian world power of the beast, the agency of the dragon (Satan) who is personally bound in hell at the Cross." We 'do this' today in light of IIThess.2:4 & Rev.13:14b of course.
Old debating Jack, trying not to 'do this.'
This post is presented both here in "Will the real "Antichrist" ..." and in "How close is the Seven Year Tribulation", to which I responded per the following:Floyd said:[SIZE=14pt]IN SUMMARY, ..[/SIZE]
Hi Floyd,
I would propose that anyone who presents "incorrect "truths" [SIZE=14pt]are "antichrist" in the plural![/SIZE]Floyd said:
[SIZE=14pt]Any who try to argue against these truths, are identifying themselves as "antichrist" in the plural![/SIZE]
So now that I've got your attention, please allow me to cite your incorrect truth:
Your statement presumes there is a first 3 1/2 years, and a second 3 1/2 years. This 7 year premise comes from the 9th Chapter of Daniel, which has NOTHING to do with the Tribulation era, except that the a/c "shall come" after the seventy weeks:Floyd said:
... [SIZE=14pt]descriptive of his actions in the last 3[/SIZE][SIZE=14pt]½[/SIZE][SIZE=14pt] years of time[/SIZE]
Daniel 9:27
27 And he shall make a strong covenant with many for one week; and for half of the week he shall cause sacrifice and offering to cease; and upon the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate, until the decreed end is poured out on the desolator.”
Hope this helps,
DD
DaDad said:To All,
This post is presented both here in "Will the real "Antichrist" ..." and in "How close is the Seven Year Tribulation", to which I responded per the following:
Your statement presumes there is a first 3 1/2 years, and a second 3 1/2 years. This 7 year premise comes from the 9th Chapter of Daniel, which has NOTHING to do with the Tribulation era, except that the a/c "shall come" after the seventy weeks:Floyd said:... [SIZE=14pt]descriptive of his actions in the last 3[/SIZE][SIZE=14pt]½[/SIZE][SIZE=14pt] years of time[/SIZE]
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE allow me to present the impossibilities of the seventy sevens = 490 years, wherein the seventieth week is the Tribulation week, -- false doctrine.Floyd said:You are of course welcome to your opinion.
Floyd.