"Salvation" is the gift of Eternal Life - it's FOREVER.

[GRACE ambassador]

Instead those who believed came of their own free will, and equally, they can turn away of their own free will.

This is simply a Confusing Misunderstanding of God's "Work," in The Following...:

(1) "God’s SURE Foundation Has THIS SEAL”:

“The LORD Knoweth them that Are HIS!..." (2 Timothy 2:19 KJB!), Correct?

(2) HOW LONG Has "The LORD KNOWN them That Are HIS Own"?

(Ephesians 1:4-6 KJB!) = ALWAYS, Correct?

(3) For those who are LOST, how is it That The LORD Said Unto them:

“I NEVER Knew you”? (Matthew 7:21-23 KJB!) = NEVER, Correct?

Conclusion:

Thus, the doctrine of "Christ ONCE {Always?} knew one forgiven And
Eternally Saved, And, Then when they walked away of their OWN
FREE WILL, He [NEVER knew?] Did NOT know them Any Longer,
and they Became LOST!":

Is NOWHERE found God's Pure And HOLY Scripture, Correct?

Also, Contradicting THIS, Concerning God's Ownership:

"1Co_6:19 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of The Holy
Ghost Which is in you, Which ye have of God, and ye are NOT your own?

equal FREE WILL? Cooper, care to Try Again?
---------------------------------------------------
...and a Whole Lot (12 DOZEN) More Plain And Clear Scriptures!:

God's OPERATION On All HIS New-born babes In CHRIST!
God's Eternal Assurance

Peace!

 

[Eternally Grateful]

Romans 7:14-25 KJV
(14) For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
(15) For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
(16) If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
(17) Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
(18) For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
(19) For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
(20) Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
(21) I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
(22) For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
(23) But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
(24) O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
(25) I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
.

who delivered paul from the body of death?

 

[ScottA]

Romans 7:14-25 KJV
(14) For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
(15) For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
(16) If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
(17) Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
(18) For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
(19) For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
(20) Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
(21) I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
(22) For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
(23) But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
(24) O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
(25) I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
.

You are not "right dividing" the word as Paul instructed.

Again...Paul was speaking about Old Testament issues of the law, and speaking...preaching to the unsaved Romans.

But I suspect that you will think that Paul himself was saved, making his counsel not about what he said, but what he himself was. But one could only draw that conclusion if they were blind to whom he spoke...and also to the fact that he qualified himself not as being saved or unsaved, but as being both, as being "all things to all people."

How many things do you intend to leave out, that you need to be told about? For the same reason Jesus had to ask the priests and the Pharisees, "Have you not read..?"

 

[ScottA]

Thus, the doctrine of "Christ ONCE {Always?} knew one forgiven And
Eternally Saved, And, Then when they walked away of their OWN
FREE WILL, He [NEVER knew?]

Excellent point!

Saved means saved, and never means never.

If anyone has an ear, let them hear.

 

[BarneyFife]

did peter lose salvation?

Did Jesus go to peter and demand he repent? Did he go and force him to bow down and ask him to be saved again?

I guess we don't have to answer each other's questions if you don't want to.

 

[BarneyFife]

"It is finished."
Yes, this you have made perfectly clear.

That's nice, but I still don't know where in the Bible it says the "it" that was finished refers to the complete Atonement process.

 

[ScottA]

That's nice, but I still don't know where in the Bible it says the "it" that was finished refers to the complete Atonement process.

What is "it" then that you presume Christ came for?

(I'm not trying to be smart, but to help you think it through. )

 

[Eternally Grateful]

I guess we don't have to answer each other's questions if you don't want to.

I answered your question with a question.

Peter did not lose salvation. But you already know I believe this.

So I asked you to think why I believe the way I do.

 

[GRACE ambassador]

That's nice, but I still don't know where in the Bible it says the "it" that was finished refers to the complete Atonement process.

So, what do you think "it" refers to?

 

[marks]

That's nice, but I still don't know where in the Bible it says the "it" that was finished refers to the complete Atonement process.

A direct statement, I don't know, however, "this is the new covenant in my blood", and when He poured out that blood, "it is finished".

Concerning the complete atonement through His death,

Acts 20:28 KJV
Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.

Purchased with His Own blood. Reconciled by His death.

Much love!

 

[marks]

If one is actually saved, it is no longer they who live, but God who lives. Thus, it is no longer their [free] will, but God's. And it is not His will "that any should perish but that all should come to repentance."

I think I get this a lot better now than I used to.

It always comes to taking each word fully and seriously.

"The body is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness". No longer I, but Christ lives in me. Yes!

Much love!

 

[marks]

(23) But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

Another law in your members. The patterns of the Adamic man left in your flesh. That's the corruption of the flesh. So as the electricity of the mind courses through the neurons, it follows all the same old pathways it always did.

In rebirth we are new creations, living spirits, not fleshy men. We are alive because Jesus has come in, and His presence in us revives the dead spirit, and we come to live out from among the rest of the dead ones. That mind which is at war with, literally, our body parts, is not the mind resident in the flesh. We are new spirit beings who have been born from God. We have a new mind, the mind of Christ. And this mind does not function the same as the mind of the flesh. The mind of the flesh follows the neural pathways of the brain. The mind of the Spirit follows the Spirit.

When we are living in the mind of the Spirit, brain plasticity comes into play, re-writing our neural pathways. This is the renewing of the mind. Enforcing a new mental landscape based on Jesus, as revealed by the Holy Spirit in the pages of Scripture and in His working in our lives. Seeing what God does through us and in us transforms us into Him image. As He transforms us into Jesus' image, we see what that image is actually like.

The mind of the flesh sets the default state of mind resident in the body. As we follow the mind of Christ, examining our minds, our thoughts and feelings, and only allowing those that conform to Godliness, our brains begin to rewire the neural pathways according to that. So we improve our default state. We find fewer fleshy interuptions, because we've retooled in favor of Spirit.

We walk in the Spirit by faith in any case. That is always true, but in the renewing of the mind we find less conflict within us. But then of course God continues to test us, and as we grow stronger, the tests get harder, so, well, again, we always walk by faith and not sight.

Much love!

 

[Taken]

Israel proves you wrong.
.

Irrelevant accusation. No facts.

 

[Taken]

Wait till Jesus says, "I never knew you."
.

Yes Jesus will say that, but not to me.

 

[Taken]

That is how you came to be in a cult. You have no spiritual discernment. The warnings against deserting God are numerous. Why are the warnings there? They are there because it happens.
.

Your last three post are simply accusations. That’s what happens when you can not support what you claim.

 

[Taken]

No. And he doesn't force me to remain in him either.

Are you saved?

 

[BarneyFife]

What is "it" then that you presume Christ came for?

(I'm not trying to be smart, but to help you think it through. )

Thanks. Do you presume that Christ came for only one purpose? Believe it or not, I'm not trying to be smart, either.

 

[Taken]

So yt are proposing two different forms of salvation? That's a new one!

It’s not different Forms. But It was NEW, 2,000 years ago!

* Salvation is only given ONCE. <—- Nothing new.

* Different People, Different Times. <—-New 2,000 years ago!

* Jesus’ (HS Baptized) Church raised Up to Clouds, before the Tribulation, signaled by the Trump of the Archangel.

* After 7 yr Trib, Jesus’, His Saints, occupy Jesus’ earthly kingdom 1,000 yrs.

* All men (without the mark of the Beast) who physically Die Believing, from the Beginning of mankind through Trib.. Shall be Baptized in the HS when they Physically Die....
(BECAUSE they ENDURED BELIEVING, until the ends of their physical Life.)

* God shall RAISE THEM after the 1,000 year reign.

* Yes ALL of Israel (which IS believing Tribesmen), shall BE SAVED.

 

[BarneyFife]

I answered your question with a question.

Peter did not lose salvation. But you already know I believe this.

So I asked you to think why I believe the way I do.

I don't believe Peter had any "salvation" to lose. I don't believe in "salvation" as a condition or state of being, as it is used in evangelical circles today. I'm mainly concerned with knowing God Whom to know is life eternal, which always begins today, and really kicks into high gear at His second coming. This could be expressed in many other ways. The Bible is full of them. I really like the Bible. It testifies of Jesus, a Person I'm really crazy about. I'm pretty weird. I think most people (including myself) are influenced too much by the teachings of men. I'm trying to get out of that. I believe it's a lifetime process. I think Jesus loves us so much that if we're trying to do His will we will grow up into Him in all things and help others to grow, as well. The modern obsession with salvation causes a lot of distorted thinking, I've noticed. Oh well, I've probably said too much.

 

[GodsGrace]

I am tired of this whole depend on self and not rely on God thing (NOSAS)
I am also tired of the gnostic excuse to ignore what John said.

EG,
I don't know any Christian that depends on himself for salvation.
Isn't this why Jesus died for us? So we could depend on Him for our salvation?
As to John and 1 John 2:19...did you ever study John and gnosticim?
Seems like you've heard it before...maybe it's right?

If you're at all interested, the net is full of information for John's letters and why he wrote them.
Here is one interesting site...start at page 42 to about 44
https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1361&context=wes_theses

22 Who is the liar? It is whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son. 23 No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also.

It is not just Gnostics who deny the son, Athiests do. Any unbeliever does.

he also seperated them from true believers

20 But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and all of you know the truth. 21 I do not write to you because you do not know the truth, but because you do know it and because no lie comes from the truth.

Unlike the unbelievers who did nto know truth. These people recieved the anointing and knew truth

The verse is not misused, it is factual

Regarding also THE ANNOINTED, please read the above link.
John was not concerned with atheists....but with false teachers infiltrating the church...
and mostly and basically gnostics.

I don't need to depend on John,
Paul also wrote of how we could forfeit our salvation.
Every one of his letters told of how we are to behave...

I'd also love to have an explanation of
Colossians 1:21-23
21And although you were formerly alienated and hostile in mind, engaged in evil deeds,
22yet He has now reconciled you in His fleshly body through death, in order to present you before Him holy and blameless and beyond reproach—
23if indeed you continue in the faith firmly established and steadfast, and not moved away from the hope of the gospel that you have heard, which was proclaimed in all creation under heaven, and of which I, Paul, was made a minister.